Page 1 of 1
A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-28 15:02
by Terry Tibbs
Would love to see this make it into the game eventually for the MEC forces.
What with the Eryx being used by Canada, Norway and France, and the RPG-29 being used by Russia, I think it'd make a good choice. Partly developed by Jordan, there's even a chance they may sart being manufactured there.
Russia Considers Producing RPG-32 in Jordan - Defense-Update
Modern Firearms - RPG-32 'Hashim' antitank grenade launcher
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-28 16:38
by [EC]DR.NOobFragger
I am sure it might be more realistic and such but getting the MEC a new HAT it probably really low priority.
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-28 16:56
by Spartan0189
Hm, that looks a lot like how a AT-4 in PR Would work.. I think the Eryx is fine as for we don't have any French, Canadian, or Norwegian forces in PR. Yet.
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-28 17:09
by Zrix
Spartan0189 wrote:Hm, that looks a lot like how a AT-4 in PR Would work..
What, the AT-4 isn't working now?
But this looks nothing like it.
Are you perhaps confusing it with the
Carl Gustav, a more similar Bofors weapon?
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-28 17:36
by DankE_SPB
Zrix wrote:What, the AT-4 isn't working now?
But this looks nothing like it.
Are you perhaps confusing it with the
Carl Gustav, a more similar Bofors weapon?
i think he means that Eryx is guided and Hashim is not, like AT-4
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-28 19:15
by Spartan0189
Yes, It looks like an unguided weapon, like the AT-4. Sorry for any confusion.
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-28 23:38
by Hietaa
chinese HAT is also unguided.
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-29 01:24
by charliegrs
yea i dont think a hat necessarily needs to be guided. it just needs to be stronger than the lat.
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-29 02:09
by amazing_retard
charliegrs wrote:yea i dont think a hat necessarily needs to be guided. it just needs to be stronger than the lat.
Actually guided AT weapons are need on maps like Kashan, however I play PR for realism so go ahead

Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-29 04:31
by Expendable Grunt
What's wrong with them getting the Eryx? Maybe in the near future the company that patented it allows other arms manufacturers to make some?
M.
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-29 06:58
by steve_06-07
Or they could be like china and make un-licensed copies.
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-29 07:11
by nick20404
Expendable Grunt wrote:What's wrong with them getting the Eryx? Maybe in the near future the company that patented it allows other arms manufacturers to make some?
M.
I think the ERYX is Canadian and French made, in the game the mec are fighting the US so I don't think they would continue to supply them with them, unless they are already producing there own.
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-29 07:24
by ralfidude
That wuznt a SMAW you posted was it?
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-29 07:24
by ralfidude
Oh wait, nvm, saw the link again, RPG, nvm!
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-29 10:29
by Titan
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-29 11:25
by MaxBooZe
Eryx is French mad (and Canadian) and the Middle east uses A LOT of French equiptment because in the cold war era most European Countries would either buy US or West German equipment so the French turned to the middle east..
That does not count for the Eryx though since it was made in 1994.
Re: A far more Middle Eastern HAT than the Eryx
Posted: 2009-07-29 12:25
by Expendable Grunt
Personally, the fewer Russia weapons the MEC gets, the better.
M.