Page 1 of 1

is there a new version out?

Posted: 2006-05-28 19:37
by Jawbreaker
Wondering if there was a minipatch released either in bf2 or the mod? cause im getting only a few servers when I search the list, but when I take off version only for a filter it shows a lot more.

Posted: 2006-05-28 19:39
by Razen
Jawbreaker wrote:Wondering if there was a minipatch released either in bf2 or the mod? cause im getting only a few servers when I search the list, but when I take off version only for a filter it shows a lot more.
BF2 Released patch 1.3 earlier this week. However, PRMM dev's are not reccommending players to patch to 1.3 as it has caused crashing issues.

From what I've read, the PRMM dev's are working on a solution/mini-patch for this.

Posted: 2006-05-28 19:44
by Jawbreaker
hmmm.. strange that you say that cause I went and checked the bf2 main site and there was no news about the 1.3 patch being released... they have news announcing it but nothing about the release... strange.

THnx.

Posted: 2006-05-28 19:47
by JuniperM40
Jawbreaker wrote:hmmm.. strange that you say that cause I went and checked the bf2 main site and there was no news about the 1.3 patch being released... they have news announcing it but nothing about the release... strange.

THnx.

Um, THIS Main site: ?

http://www.ea.com/official/battlefield/battlefield2/us/home.jsp

That's EA's official main site. The 1.3 patch is plastered across the window in a few places.

- JM40.

Posted: 2006-05-28 19:47
by Razen

Posted: 2006-05-29 00:12
by Jawbreaker
thnx, oh great... more stupid **** coming back with this patchin vanilla bf2..............

time to quit bf2 and go prmm all the way.

Posted: 2006-05-29 00:22
by eddie
lol, you forget EA's precious 'craptastic' patches are still needed for PRMM :(

Posted: 2006-05-29 00:34
by Jawbreaker
yeah I know, the one downside of it all.....

I guess the one thing that is actually a little interesting is the air drop for vehicles or whatever it is that I read in the release notes... but still... c4 tossing is back... im sure more bugs are to ensue.... I think EA can take bf2 and *looks around and see's people staring at him* nvm....

lol for the lighter side of things, this new **** with EA now is they are trying to get people to upgrade to winXP now by adding a win2k install blocker on most of their new games coming out. (bfme2, AOE3, BF2142<most likely>). So me being a fan of Battle for Middle Earth I went out and bought the second game in the series, then I come home and try to install it. Now I use win2k and the game wouldnt install because of the blocker, and since I hardly ever check the boxes for system requirements I was rather pissed off... so after about 2 hours of searching the installer code I found their little blocker and disabled it and now it works just peachy on win2k :) IN YOUR FACE EA! I take every chance I get to get back at EA for all the **** they have caused in the past.

Posted: 2006-05-29 00:35
by Skullening.Chris
Wow, a win2k blocker. That's just sad. Glad you found a way around it. Any idea why they would even do such a thing?

Posted: 2006-05-29 00:41
by EON_MagicMan
Skullening.Chris wrote:Wow, a win2k blocker. That's just sad. Glad you found a way around it. Any idea why they would even do such a thing?
Right, a win2k blocker. I think sometimes we all have to examine things a bit more-- obviously they haven't put a win2k blocker. They could never strike a deal with Microsoft like that or anything. It's probably because they use technology that goes with WinXPs programming (including things like minimizing the game) and that goes with WinXP's technology.

Posted: 2006-05-29 02:54
by Jawbreaker
Right, a win2k blocker. I think sometimes we all have to examine things a bit more-- obviously they haven't put a win2k blocker. They could never strike a deal with Microsoft like that or anything. It's probably because they use technology that goes with WinXPs programming (including things like minimizing the game) and that goes with WinXP's technology.
Actually, it is a blocker. want to know how I know? heres why.

If it wasnt just a blocker, I never would have been able to install the game in the first place. If it wasnt a blocker, the game right now would not run on my win2k smoothly.

Heres why its a blocker.

It was only included in the coding of the installer, not the game itself (which is why the game runs just fine once its disabled). Once it was disabled, the game installed just fine, no problems whatsoever. Oh and another fact is when you first tried to install with it on, it gave back a message that said "This game cannot be installed on this machine because you are running win2k which is not supported."

heres what I believe, or my oppinion for that matter.

EA struck some sort of deal with Microsoft. Heres why. Microsoft found many people not upgrading to winXP when it came out. Why? because it was not a good system so many people believed.

Everyone liked win2k, as it had been the main OS for a number of years. They got comfortable with the style of it and didnt want to change.

This is another reason why any system you buy now from a retail store (not that I do) is installed with winXP.

Because EA is one of the biggest game developers out there, they figured that getting them to block win2k with their games they release it would force gamers to ugprade to winXP. Which for the most part it has, it started with AOE3, a game which was one of the biggest releases of the year mainly because its a great classic; Many people were fans of the old AOE series. They made that game so that it wouldnt play on win2k. Then when they released BF2 they "tried" to block that as well, well I guess they didnt really try to block it, they just refused to support anyone running win2k with bf2. Which brings us to the release of BFME2 which is another big release (with the whole LOTR phase going on) and blocked that as well. My view is that they will continue to do this with any new games they are going to release in the future.

Heres the other thing, how many other games do you see out there only being able to install on winXP? so far I count 0 from any other game developers that doesn't support win2k or run on it. Even some of the bigger titles such as Rome: Total War and Call of Duty 2. Why not? because most of these other game developers support their gamers better and are not as big as EA. They care more and they dont want to lose their gaming community. Which is why microsoft chose EA as their pawn so to speak.

Thats just my oppinion.

Posted: 2006-05-29 03:25
by trogdor1289
Yeah as far as I am concered EA is overly concered with profit at the expense of customer care. Sorry for the bad spelling of concered it's late and i'm slightly buzzed.