Suggestions for MEC forces.
Posted: 2006-06-02 20:04
If the MEC are going to hang onto their Russian small arms (which has been thrown into doubt) then they should either standardise on the 5.56mm NATO from their AK-101s or on the 5.45mm Soviet ammunition from the AKS-74Us and RPK-74s. I would suggest the latter as there are no current RPK series weapons chambered for the 5.56 NATO round, althought the AKS-74U could be replaced with the AK-102, with sutibally increased accuracy and reduced recoil due to the superior characterisitcs of the weapon.
Also, if the USMC special operations class is to recive the M4A1 in SOPMOD configuration then I would request that the AKS-74U-UBN, equipped with a PBS-1 suppressor and a BS-1 30mm suppressed grenade launcher replace the AKS-74U currently in the hands of the MEC special operations class.
Also, if the pilot/tank crew class were ever implimented then I would reccomend that the MEC version be armed with the AKS-74U as this weapon was originally desinged to act as a PDW for Tank, Helicopter, etc vehicle crews. Or possibly with either the SR-3 "Vihr" or the 9A-91 9mm compact assault rifles.
In addition, if either the 5.56 or 5.45 is used the the AK-101 should be replaced with either the AK-108 (5.56) or A91 (5.56) or AK-107 (5.45) or the AEK-971 (5.45). This is becuase I dont think that with the oil wealth of the middle east behind them they would equip their troops with weapons that are obviosly inferior to other desinges that could be aquired from the same supplier.
As well as this, the Dragunov should be replaced with the VSS Vintores or VSK-94 on urban maps, as this would provide the MEC with a rifle with similar stealth capabilites and better performance than the US equivelent (I considered asking for the VSSK, but thought it unreasonable). Then again, if you dont want to give them a suppressed sniper system, I quite understand.
Also, the DShK/DShKMs mounted on vodnicks and tanks should be replaced with one of the following:
NSV 12.7mm
Kord 12.7mm
KPV 14.5mm *cough*thisoneyouknowyouwantto*cough*
Just becuase the US uses HMGs from the 1920s dosent mean the MEC shouldnt have the latest Russian equipment.
When the RPG-7 is introduced dont, for God's/Allah's/Thor's/whateverthehellyoubelievein give into the temptation to arm it with the classic PG-7V or PG-7VL rockets. Give it The PG-7VR, one of the latest designes of AT rocket for the RPG-7 and equiped with a tandem warhead. And you know you want to (if possible, of course) give the RPG gunner a choice between AT, thermobaric and fragmentation rockets.
Also, the RPG-22 LAW or RPG-26 LAW (although this is the bunker buster version) could be used by the light MEC AT class (or given to the assault class if the idea of giving them disposable rockets is held onto).
So, what do you think?
Also, if the USMC special operations class is to recive the M4A1 in SOPMOD configuration then I would request that the AKS-74U-UBN, equipped with a PBS-1 suppressor and a BS-1 30mm suppressed grenade launcher replace the AKS-74U currently in the hands of the MEC special operations class.
Also, if the pilot/tank crew class were ever implimented then I would reccomend that the MEC version be armed with the AKS-74U as this weapon was originally desinged to act as a PDW for Tank, Helicopter, etc vehicle crews. Or possibly with either the SR-3 "Vihr" or the 9A-91 9mm compact assault rifles.
In addition, if either the 5.56 or 5.45 is used the the AK-101 should be replaced with either the AK-108 (5.56) or A91 (5.56) or AK-107 (5.45) or the AEK-971 (5.45). This is becuase I dont think that with the oil wealth of the middle east behind them they would equip their troops with weapons that are obviosly inferior to other desinges that could be aquired from the same supplier.
As well as this, the Dragunov should be replaced with the VSS Vintores or VSK-94 on urban maps, as this would provide the MEC with a rifle with similar stealth capabilites and better performance than the US equivelent (I considered asking for the VSSK, but thought it unreasonable). Then again, if you dont want to give them a suppressed sniper system, I quite understand.
Also, the DShK/DShKMs mounted on vodnicks and tanks should be replaced with one of the following:
NSV 12.7mm
Kord 12.7mm
KPV 14.5mm *cough*thisoneyouknowyouwantto*cough*
Just becuase the US uses HMGs from the 1920s dosent mean the MEC shouldnt have the latest Russian equipment.
When the RPG-7 is introduced dont, for God's/Allah's/Thor's/whateverthehellyoubelievein give into the temptation to arm it with the classic PG-7V or PG-7VL rockets. Give it The PG-7VR, one of the latest designes of AT rocket for the RPG-7 and equiped with a tandem warhead. And you know you want to (if possible, of course) give the RPG gunner a choice between AT, thermobaric and fragmentation rockets.
Also, the RPG-22 LAW or RPG-26 LAW (although this is the bunker buster version) could be used by the light MEC AT class (or given to the assault class if the idea of giving them disposable rockets is held onto).
So, what do you think?