Re: PR v0.9 and y computer
Posted: 2010-01-24 01:50
Well for me, it runs better, but for other people, it runs worse. I guess you'll have to wait and see.
Or this one:rushn wrote:you can run BF2 on hish settings with ATI 4850 or Nvidia 8800GT
if you have troubles running this then build a new computer Dream Machine 2009: How To Build the Best PC For Any Budget! | Maximum PC
this should be even cheaper this year and you will have to pay for windows 7
That's what EA does. They optimize BF2 for people who have shit pc's. They said they won't put heloes or jets on Karkand because of all the statics, etc..ma21212 wrote:well is it possible to make maps run better? i mean i have a s*** computer and i get low FPS count, (saving up for newone) but cant you guys just make it run smoother? just for the sake of ppl who have **** computers?
look at it from the other sidema21212 wrote:well is it possible to make maps run better? i mean i have a s*** computer and i get low FPS count, (saving up for newone) but cant you guys just make it run smoother? just for the sake of ppl who have **** computers?
No, PR should never have to compromise itself for the lowest common denominator either in graphics quality or gameplay. That does not mean that a lot of work doesn't go in to getting it running as smoothly as possible, but it does mean that we should always be pushing to make PR look and play as brilliantly as possible.ma21212 wrote:well is it possible to make maps run better? i mean i have a s*** computer and i get low FPS count, (saving up for newone) but cant you guys just make it run smoother? just for the sake of ppl who have **** computers?
Well sorry for them but if everyone was to see it like that the world would never evolve. And not to be rude or anything on those who dont have the money to buy a computer, but if you cant run PR on the lowest setting you cant honestly believe that the devs will stop just because you cant buy new parts and upgrade your computer from the early dinosaur time period.hobbnob wrote:will the devs ever consider makign a "lite" version of pr? I'm thinking of the people here with really bad pc's, i'm sure you know what i'm on about. There are probably people who simply look the other way when they see the 3gb download size of pr, because for some it's just too much.
Again, no. This what the low graphics options are for. I cannot understand why people complain about the file size of PR, it is a 3GB file where any game that you d/l from steam nowadays is gonna be at least twice that. As an example I got GTA 4 from steam which is 15GB in size...hobbnob wrote:will the devs ever consider makign a "lite" version of pr? I'm thinking of the people here with really bad pc's, i'm sure you know what i'm on about. There are probably people who simply look the other way when they see the 3gb download size of pr, because for some it's just too much.