Is swimming realistic?
Posted: 2010-03-05 03:39
Something Ive been wondering about lately is this. Of all the aspects of vanilla that have been removed im still surprised that you can swim. The reason being, that I understand as a modern day soldier with body armor and all the other gear that can add up to 70-100 pounds of extra weight on a person. I would think that in water you would sink like a rock, not to mention all the water the uniform would soak up and weigh you down even further. So I think that in PR, when in anything over waist deep water yuo should sink and die {if possible} or just die.
I dont suggest this simply for the sake of realism, but I believe theres a tactical aspect to this as well. Right now, a blown bridge is only a deterrent to vehicles. Infantry will simply just swim across. Which imo, is not realistic at all. This makes it so the defense and repair of things like bridges is now important. And blowing up bridges to deny the enemy team another route to a CP is also now way more important.
I would suggest that no conventional factions be able to swim, however, factions like the insurgents,taliban,hamas I say should still be able to swim as they typically not wearing any body armor and carry much less gear. Not to mention the more guerilla way they do things, swimming would not be out of the question to get into a good position to launch an ambush or place an IED.
If anyone here is in a military and can clue me in to the realism of swimming soldiers on the battlefield then by all means, correct me if im wrong about it. But one thing I remember is hearing about all the soldiers who drowned in the ocean at normany on D-day due to swimming with all that gear.
I dont suggest this simply for the sake of realism, but I believe theres a tactical aspect to this as well. Right now, a blown bridge is only a deterrent to vehicles. Infantry will simply just swim across. Which imo, is not realistic at all. This makes it so the defense and repair of things like bridges is now important. And blowing up bridges to deny the enemy team another route to a CP is also now way more important.
I would suggest that no conventional factions be able to swim, however, factions like the insurgents,taliban,hamas I say should still be able to swim as they typically not wearing any body armor and carry much less gear. Not to mention the more guerilla way they do things, swimming would not be out of the question to get into a good position to launch an ambush or place an IED.
If anyone here is in a military and can clue me in to the realism of swimming soldiers on the battlefield then by all means, correct me if im wrong about it. But one thing I remember is hearing about all the soldiers who drowned in the ocean at normany on D-day due to swimming with all that gear.