More weapon damage and ironsight zoom
Posted: 2010-03-06 00:10
It takes around 2 hits to the chest or 3 to the legs to "critically wound" someone with most rifles. That results in that mgs are way better than they should be. If they were as good as they are in game, the armies around the world would only use machine guns. The reason they are so good in PR is that they are the only weapon that can fire 2 or more shots in fast paste and still hit.
If you fire at a guy with a mg, and hit him, he will not die, and meanwhile, he will get like 40 bullets into you if he has seen you. If you have a ordinary rifle and try to shoot someone at a distance, you'll lay down, wait 4 seconds, hit him in the back. He'll rise up and run to cover and heal himself, which feels a bit silly.
I suggest that weapon damage for all rifles should be raised to that of Lee Enfield. Something like one hit to the upperbody except arms, instant death. Legs and arms, one hit, and you'll see white and black and bleed out in matter of seconds.
This would balance out the mgs.
Further more I suggest that there should be a iron sight zoom like in BF2. Than there wouldn't be such a unbalance between scoped and unscoped rifles. The computer screen is just too small. IRL I would say that it is just as easy to hit a target with a scope as with ironsight up to at least 250 m. To hit something at 250 meters with ironsight in game is way too hard compared to with scope.
Thoughts?
If you fire at a guy with a mg, and hit him, he will not die, and meanwhile, he will get like 40 bullets into you if he has seen you. If you have a ordinary rifle and try to shoot someone at a distance, you'll lay down, wait 4 seconds, hit him in the back. He'll rise up and run to cover and heal himself, which feels a bit silly.
I suggest that weapon damage for all rifles should be raised to that of Lee Enfield. Something like one hit to the upperbody except arms, instant death. Legs and arms, one hit, and you'll see white and black and bleed out in matter of seconds.
This would balance out the mgs.
Further more I suggest that there should be a iron sight zoom like in BF2. Than there wouldn't be such a unbalance between scoped and unscoped rifles. The computer screen is just too small. IRL I would say that it is just as easy to hit a target with a scope as with ironsight up to at least 250 m. To hit something at 250 meters with ironsight in game is way too hard compared to with scope.
Thoughts?
