just wondering if there will be any skyranes? it would be cool to have tanks dropped onto the field by a huge flying crane. just a thought.
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-18 07:41
by Adetter
Hard to modell i guess.......
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-18 07:48
by master of the templars
The one thing i dislike about Vietnam era conflicts, all the hideous helicopter designs.
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-18 09:37
by Maxfragg
airlifting is possible but buggy, and without airlifting, this thing would be pretty pointless
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-18 12:47
by Snazz
master of the templars wrote:The one thing i dislike about Vietnam era conflicts, all the hideous helicopter designs.
Practicality > Aesthetics
That said I like the look of most Vietnam era helicopters personally, a lot of which have been upgraded since and continue to serve (Chinook, Huey, Cobra, Stallion, Littlebird).
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-18 15:23
by TheOldBreed
to be fair, i can't see the skycrane being used a whole lot, in combat i mean. in 'nam, armour was used for things: base defence; search & destroy operations; route security; up North they were pretty decent at stopping border incursions. i'm guessing the skycrane was used to transport tanks that thad been immobilized "deep in the bush" (teehee) or vice versa back into it.
what i mean to say is, in the situations that PRV will give, they'll most likely be nothing more than infantry support or maybe at best be used for route security. in these situations, airlifting armour here, there and everywhere would pretty much be irrelevant.
sick suggestion though man
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-18 15:28
by Adetter
Maybe because in Vietnam war was the first time helicopters was a part of the combat....
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-18 16:22
by Hitman.2.5
Snazz wrote:Stallion
Back then it was called the "jolly Green Giant"
Sorry it wa the HH-53 super jolly...
Why would we need the sky crane I mean with choppers in the BF2 engine you can not lift stuff so what would be the point... Nice to have but not needed imo
Besides if it were possible I'd want a Droge drop Sheridan on a sled from a C-130 XD
This too would be nice to have but that wouldn't be necessary in PR:V:BF2 how ever if PR:A2 becomes successful which it will and they think about making PR:A2:V the possibilities would be awesome.
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-21 07:51
by mangeface
Snazz wrote:Practicality > Aesthetics
That said I like the look of most Vietnam era helicopters personally, a lot of which have been upgraded since and continue to serve (Chinook, Huey, Cobra, Stallion, Littlebird).
You pretty much forgot the most important one of them. The CH-46 Sea Knight, a.k.a. the Phrog.
Funny how pretty much most of them are USMC aircraft.
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-21 14:45
by JohnnyTheIED
Anybody remember the Desert Combat AC-130 gunship?
The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-21 15:21
by Sgt.BountyOrig
I think its always had a back trap that worked (it does in DC now though anyway)
It might be better balanced if the BF2 version didnt have a tonna guns on the side.
Alternatively, that just makes it a faster, and probably less safer sky crane
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-21 15:56
by Hitman.2.5
TheOldBreed wrote:to be fair, i can't see the skycrane being used a whole lot, in combat i mean. in 'nam, armour was used for things: base defence; search & destroy operations; route security; up North they were pretty decent at stopping border incursions. i'm guessing the skycrane was used to transport tanks that thad been immobilized "deep in the bush" (teehee) or vice versa back into it.
what i mean to say is, in the situations that PRV will give, they'll most likely be nothing more than infantry support or maybe at best be used for route security. in these situations, airlifting armour here, there and everywhere would pretty much be irrelevant.
sick suggestion though man
Actually they were used a lot especially with the construction of a firebase they choppered in D7 dozers
and Case Back hoe's
and small containers to be buried and made into command bunkers
but why would we need this?
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-21 16:03
by Smiddey723
JohnnyTheIED wrote:Anybody remember the Desert Combat AC-130 gunship?
The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.
Funny you say this, i was looking at youtube videos of DC the other day and one of the comments was "What game is this, Project Reality?"
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-21 23:49
by TheOldBreed
Hitman.2.5 wrote:Actually they were used a lot especially with the construction of a firebase they choppered in D7 dozers
but why would we need this?
aye, but i meant in combat situations.
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-23 15:36
by Hitman.2.5
Were tanks frequently air dropped by a sky crane into the field? or were they "MECivac'ing" them out of the field?
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-27 18:59
by xatu miller
JohnnyTheIED wrote:Anybody remember the Desert Combat AC-130 gunship?
The DCX version would carry jeeps and stuff inside, with a fully functional back trap.
Possible in 1942 not BF2 sadly.
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-27 20:24
by sakils2
Re: CH-54A skycrane?
Posted: 2010-04-30 10:16
by pfhatoa
Adetter wrote:Maybe because in Vietnam war was the first time helicopters was a part of the combat....
A bit off topic but that is not true. The french army used armed helicopters in the Algerian War and U.S.A used some during the korean war.