Page 1 of 1

GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-08 00:19
by FuzzySquirrel
To replace my Dead card, which is better, they look about the same. So, In your guy's opinions, what's best?

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-08 01:03
by SnipeHunt
Nvidia!!! Everytime I hear about a problem related to a video card it is always ATI.

Nvidia is more expensive usually, but I think most games are created with them in mind (or installed.)

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-08 03:10
by FuzzySquirrel

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-08 09:40
by VoXiNaTiOn
4890 has the edge in games, especially if you get one that can hit a 1Ghz core clock. (Proof here, is a GTX275 vs 4890 review but the GTX260 is included in the graphs.)

However if you plan to use technologies that are only on/better on nV cards (Such as CUDA, PhysX, 3D Vision etc etc) then I'd go with nVidia. Personally I try to stick with nVidia cards myself, as I've had a better experience with them and I use CUDA to fold.

The GTX260 you posted should be good :) .

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-08 13:10
by Drunkenup
Just remember with Nvidia there's a strict rule about brands, sometime it'll do better for you if you buy from a proven brand. I don't exactly know about BFG, as I've never owned one of their cards, but I know PNY, and EVGA are top notch all around.

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-08 13:22
by karambaitos
I would go for 4890 because of the power/price ratio, ive had terrible driver experiences on Nvidia :)
in benchmarks it seems that the 4870 is better than the 260
also both have GDDR5 1GB and the 260has 896 mb.
also if you do plan on using stupid and expensive things like 3d vision then go for.
its sort of a pick your poison deal,
since there is no consistency in any reviews with the 4890 its either better than a 285 or worse than a 275
depending on the games
although it does get a bit less hot under load than the 260

Review - Radeon HD 4890 vs GeForce GTX 275 | bit-tech.net

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-08 13:25
by j45h89
Drunkenup wrote:Just remember with Nvidia there's a strict rule about brands, sometime it'll do better for you if you buy from a proven brand. I don't exactly know about BFG, as I've never owned one of their cards, but I know PNY, and EVGA are top notch all around.
I have this exact card. I have had 3 BFG cards now and they are in my opinion the best out there. You get a lifetime warranty and 24/7 tech support which, thankfully i haven't had to use, not many of the others who use nvidia based cards offer that. The card itself is great for PR and i manage to run both Crysis and FSX with all settings on ultra high. I've been using mine for about a year now and haven't had any problems what so ever. Just make sure the rest of your hardware is up to date, otherwise you will limit the cards performance. Also make sure the card can fit. It is quite big, takes up 2 16x slots, but it only needs one 16x slot to plug into, the card extends quite far back so make sure you have a big enough case, i found i had to buy a new case as the card was blocked by the tower that accommodates the hard drives. Also you need a decent power supply, the card needs 2x 6pin auxiliary power connectors.

I highly recommend the the BFG 260 card and as always you can't go wrong with nvidia.
Hope that helps

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-08 15:46
by FuzzySquirrel
karambaitos wrote:I would go for 4890 because of the power/price ratio, ive had terrible driver experiences on Nvidia :)
in benchmarks it seems that the 4870 is better than the 260
also both have GDDR5 1GB and the 260has 896 mb.
also if you do plan on using stupid and expensive things like 3d vision then go for.
its sort of a pick your poison deal,
since there is no consistency in any reviews with the 4890 its either better than a 285 or worse than a 275
depending on the games
although it does get a bit less hot under load than the 260

Review - Radeon HD 4890 vs GeForce GTX 275 | bit-tech.net

http://www.techspot.com/articles-info/1 ... CoH_01.png
http://www.techspot.com/articles-info/1 ... ead_01.png
http://www.techspot.com/articles-info/1 ... FC2_01.png

They're mostly even, and you should remember, the 260 has 448-bit bandwith as opposed to 256-bit on the HD 4890, I don't have a super hi-res monitor anyway, so the 1GB/896 barrier wont effect me to much. I also had a 4870 before it died (after 3 days...) and while its performance was o.k, it wasn't what I was hoping for, but heck, I might splurge and get a GTX 275.

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-08 16:16
by karambaitos
GTX275 is ridiculously expensive might as well get a 5850 then since its more powerful and either same price or 10$ more

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-08 17:19
by FuzzySquirrel
karambaitos wrote:GTX275 is ridiculously expensive might as well get a 5850 then since its more powerful and either same price or 10$ more
$249 > $309

BFG BFGEGTX275896OCE GeForce GTX 275 OverClocked Video Card - 896MB, PCI Express 2.0 x16, SLI Ready, Dual DVI, HDTV, w/FREE Game Coupon at TigerDirect.com

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-14 19:01
by SocketMan
Both cards will run BF2 :P R at 100fps.For PR:A2 a 4890 would be a better choice then a 260.I have both (2x260, and
one 4890).I'd go with dx11 card (like 5850 or 5770) however.

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-14 20:33
by FuzzySquirrel

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-14 20:41
by corp_calqluslethal
I don't know man, you'll have the latest greatest with that card but i got a gt 240 ddr5 for a 3rd of that.(70 bucks) and i can play the Arma 2 on very high. If it was me i wouldn't spend the extra 150 for that extra small amount of performance. My thoughts.

Thats just me i'd never spend more than a hundred bucks for a card, Plenty people do however. But no matter what you get you not gonna get 100 fps on Arma 2. I only play PR and ARMA 2 and don't plan on getting another game till PR 2. So my card suites me. If all you playing is the same then I say don't waste your money on that card. But if you wanna play other games i don't know how the gt 240 ddr5 handles buts its a good *** card seeing as its the only nvidia card with ddr5.

Re: GTX 260 or HD 4890?

Posted: 2010-05-14 23:34
by SocketMan
FuzzySquirrel wrote:The HD 5830 looks pretty smexy, It apparently has performance similar to a 4890.

Newegg.com - POWERCOLOR PCS+ AX5830 1GBD5-PPDH Radeon HD 5830 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video Card w/ Eyefinity

Thoughts?

Newegg.com - Computer Hardware,Video Cards & Video Devices,Desktop Graphics / Video Cards,Radeon HD 5000 series,1440 Stream Processing Units


Too much staff got "taken out" to make the 5830,once it's below 200 (no rebates) then maybe...


The 260s aren't too bad with the right setup: :razz: