Project Reality Forums

the vietnamese are very very small peaple compared to the americans.

i sugest that the vietnames models are to scale in game. it would make the little guerilla fighters have a small advantage excuse the pun against the american fire power.

And make all the US kits in different sizes too, didn't the military still take anyone with two arms and legs into service?

yes they did but if you went on averages i am sure the americans where a foot taller mabey even a foot and a half.

the tunnel rats where picked becuase of their tiny build and hight so they could get through the tunnels which where very small even for they vietnamese at places.

if the problems PR encountered are any indication I expect that vbf2 player models will be used with custom kit gemeometries and textures. Otherwise you have a hell of a time making custom geos fit on to custom player models.

see ingame in PR how the British models and geos don't fit with other nations geos.

[R-CON]Rudd wrote:if the problems PR encountered are any indication I expect that vbf2 player models will be used with custom kit gemeometries and textures. Otherwise you have a hell of a time making custom geos fit on to custom player models.

see ingame in PR how the British models and geos don't fit with other nations geos.

yes... it has to be all relative.. plus the facts if you pick up an enemy kit it would be hard to scale everything correctly if there are more than one models. Already we have issues with Hats/bandanas/turbons and things.. going through heads looking all silly

yes they did but if you went on averages i am sure the americans where a foot taller mabey even a foot and a half.

We're not THAT short.

-Edit: On further research, I take that back. I guess I'm just tall.

While this maybe realistic, its not practical in gameplay terms. It is very hard to mate up new soldier and kit geometries (as has already been said). Owing to this reason PR currently has suspended indefinetly the inclusion of new soldier geometeries in PR:BF2 and I would imagine that such a stance is in place with regards to PR:V because of technical limitations.