Insurgents FAL in PR got very big inaccuracy,what makes this gun pretty unrealistic.
In some characteristics they better that AKM,ad accuracy is not hes bad side .Please fix it.FAL pretty useless at full auto at 2-3 meters at target .
So RL video.If needed - I can search video,where man shoot it uses 1 hand.
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2011-05-15 17:18
by heroes maker
did you ever shoot a 7.62x51 on full auto ? did you know it require a lot of training to know how to compensate a recoil from a weapon correctly ?
this man you show is a civilian who don't endure a moment of combat, if you add the stress and the lack of stamina due to the weight you must wear ( about 33kg ), you will see finally your FAL has a realistic recoil, but then for the accuracy, it depend how you place your aim, if you try to run and doing some CQC with a FAL ... i'm sorry to say that good sir, but you just went full retard, if you get some basic knowledge you will know why you never bring a M240 in the street.
thank you for reading
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2011-05-15 18:14
by samogon100500
heroes maker wrote:did you ever shoot a 7.62x51 on full auto ? did you know it require a lot of training to know how to compensate a recoil from a weapon correctly ?
this man you show is a civilian who don't endure a moment of combat, if you add the stress and the lack of stamina due to the weight you must wear ( about 33kg ), you will see finally your FAL has a realistic recoil, but then for the accuracy, it depend how you place your aim, if you try to run and doing some CQC with a FAL ... i'm sorry to say that good sir, but you just went full retard, if you get some basic knowledge you will know why you never bring a M240 in the street.
thank you for reading
Well - they badly thats G3.G3 and FAL both guns uses same caliber.But full automatic fire possible in CQC,FN FAL - not.Just make same characteristics with G3.
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2011-05-15 18:31
by scope
heroes maker wrote:did you ever shoot a 7.62x51 on full auto ? did you know it require a lot of training to know how to compensate a recoil from a weapon correctly ?
this man you show is a civilian who don't endure a moment of combat, if you add the stress and the lack of stamina due to the weight you must wear ( about 33kg ), you will see finally your FAL has a realistic recoil, but then for the accuracy, it depend how you place your aim, if you try to run and doing some CQC with a FAL ... i'm sorry to say that good sir, but you just went full retard, if you get some basic knowledge you will know why you never bring a M240 in the street.
thank you for reading
Since when did all insurgents become normal civilians with no training. Many of these "civilians" are ex-army or have been trained at some point.
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2011-05-16 20:33
by MrTomRobs
Having fired one of these myself (well, a semi automatic SLR) i can assure you that there is a hell of a lot of recoil on these things. Honestly, it takes a good second to re-align your sights with you target before you squeeze off another round, and that's from a prone position. On full auto or standing, i'd imagine that thing kicks like a mule. A particularly angry one at that.
I'm pretty sure the same goes for the G3, too.
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2011-06-01 10:55
by Jonathan_Archer_nx01
samogon100500 wrote:Insurgents FAL in PR got very big inaccuracy,what makes this gun pretty unrealistic.
In some characteristics they better that AKM,ad accuracy is not hes bad side .Please fix it.FAL pretty useless at full auto at 2-3 meters at target .
From my experience the FAL should be more accurate over range when fired in single shots, but it's technically impossible for it to be *** controlable as the AKM on full-auto. The 7.62x51mm cartridge simply has more kinetic energy.
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2011-06-01 11:09
by Psyko
heroes maker wrote:... i'm sorry to say that good sir, but you just went full retard
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2011-06-10 22:59
by hanadul44
heroes maker wrote:did you ever shoot a 7.62x51 on full auto ? did you know it require a lot of training to know how to compensate a recoil from a weapon correctly ?
this man you show is a civilian who don't endure a moment of combat, if you add the stress and the lack of stamina due to the weight you must wear ( about 33kg ), you will see finally your FAL has a realistic recoil, but then for the accuracy, it depend how you place your aim, if you try to run and doing some CQC with a FAL ... i'm sorry to say that good sir, but you just went full retard, if you get some basic knowledge you will know why you never bring a M240 in the street.
thank you for reading
i agree
this guys who want to reduce the recoil of fn fal was never by the army and dont have any idea about arms.
I used the G3 at the army and thats the same like FN FAL, you cannot controll the fire at autoshooting.
i would say the FAL in PR is lower accurate as in Reallife
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2011-06-10 23:05
by Smiddey723
I find the FAL one of the best cqb weapons in the game. Only down side is the mag capacity but as far as recoil is concerned if anything should be increased
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2011-06-24 16:42
by Stogie
Fired with the FN FAL/Stg 58 IRL during on the shooting range in prone, kneeling and standing position. Semi Fire, high recoil but controllable, highly accurate, full auto...only controllable with Heavy Barrel+Bipod, i guess. Never fired with a G3, but i always hear it has the same semi auto characteristics as the FAL, but is more controlable in Full Auto
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2012-04-17 09:58
by Guzzo
I'll quote here:
"The first round is there, The second round is there, The third round is there and anything after that is an Anti-Aircraft gun" - Dr. William Felix Atwater commenting on the FN FAL.
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2012-04-17 13:58
by Psyrus
That looks pretty similar to the ingame reaction to the recoil
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2012-04-17 14:47
by Von_Gnome
Why bump the thread?
(wait, now I'm doing it )
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2012-04-17 23:41
by Stealthgato
Psyrus wrote:
That looks pretty similar to the ingame reaction to the recoil
Doesn't look like a trained militiaman to me.
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2012-04-19 06:41
by Murphy
Because he isn't wearing full gear? He may very well be in the armed services on his leisure time having fun at the shooting range.
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2012-04-19 22:02
by ComradeHX
Murphy wrote:Because he isn't wearing full gear? He may very well be in the armed services on his leisure time having fun at the shooting range.
I think what he meant to say was that the guy in video was not leaning forward enough.
Then again, neither were those in-game models.
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2012-04-20 01:06
by Murphy
Fair enough, I just wanted to point out that just because someone isn't dressed for war doesn't mean he is not a warrior.
Re: FN FAL inaccuracy/recoil
Posted: 2012-04-20 03:32
by Hunt3r
7.62 NATO is only controllable in light infantry rifles with a muzzle brake.
Oh, and muzzle brakes are incredibly loud and if it isn't also a flash suppressor it will be very bright at night.