lee enfield sucks?
-
bobogaz
- Posts: 59
- Joined: 2008-05-06 11:43
lee enfield sucks?
Just for a bit of "make MEC look really 3rd world country's army" i had most of the kits have lee enfields. But what i noticed was that i could hit a enemy and he wouldnt die so since its bolt action, im garanteed dead. basically, its too low damage for a bolt action.
what u guys think?
what u guys think?
-
dtacs
- Posts: 5512
- Joined: 2008-12-07 23:30
Re: lee enfield sucks?
two shots to the chest will kill, one shot to the head and neck will also kill, its not hard to aim either if you have cover.
-
unrealalex
- Posts: 1595
- Joined: 2007-07-29 21:51
Re: lee enfield sucks?
I would like it to one hit kill =/ I got like my first kill with it ever today. I went prone, trained sights on a roof for like 5 seconds, american popped up and i got him in the head. felt good man. i see it as a challenging weapon
though it definetly sucks when you hit someone and then they turn around and wack you with their scope/semi-automaticness
-
RAW HOMICIDAL
- Posts: 350
- Joined: 2008-09-08 22:51
Re: lee enfield sucks?
find the projectile template that it uses. and go in and change the properties of that bullet.
i have a tutorial that will help, click on the link under my sig.
and to comment on the guns damage. the enfield should fire the 30-30. the 30-30 is the retard of all 30cal rounds. It is a relatively low velocity round, with a blunt/slightly rounded tipped bullet.
the enfield sucks ingame, because it would suck in RL. when you normally have an enfield you are an insurgent, and you are fighting a modern day soldier that has thousands of dollars worth of equiptment on. the 30-30 just isnt going to do that much damage to a marines body armor. however he might die from internal bleeding. ( which fits nicely with the long death after only hit an enemy 1 time.)
(just because some thing is a bolt action doesnt mean anything. they have 22lr bolt action rifles, you arnt going to do anything besides piss somebody off shooting them with that.)
i have a tutorial that will help, click on the link under my sig.
and to comment on the guns damage. the enfield should fire the 30-30. the 30-30 is the retard of all 30cal rounds. It is a relatively low velocity round, with a blunt/slightly rounded tipped bullet.
the enfield sucks ingame, because it would suck in RL. when you normally have an enfield you are an insurgent, and you are fighting a modern day soldier that has thousands of dollars worth of equiptment on. the 30-30 just isnt going to do that much damage to a marines body armor. however he might die from internal bleeding. ( which fits nicely with the long death after only hit an enemy 1 time.)
(just because some thing is a bolt action doesnt mean anything. they have 22lr bolt action rifles, you arnt going to do anything besides piss somebody off shooting them with that.)
Last edited by RAW HOMICIDAL on 2009-05-10 16:01, edited 1 time in total.

[CENTER]"Just let'm Bleed" - Homicidal PRSP Tester
Click Here [thread=55667]
[/thread] Click Here
[/thread] Click Here[/CENTER]
-
blackhatch46
- Posts: 113
- Joined: 2007-09-10 00:14
Re: lee enfield sucks?
the enfield shoots a .303 round which is very powerful and accurate. this is why it was used as a sniper round in WWII. also a 22lr would easily kill someone, it goes through armored vests that dont have SAPI plates in them. hence the name 'cop killer'RAW HOMICIDAL wrote:find the projectile template that it uses. and go in and change the properties of that bullet.
i have a tutorial that will help, click on the link under my sig.
and to comment on the guns damage. the enfield should fire the 30-30. the 30-30 is the retard of all 30cal rounds. It is a relatively low velocity round, with a blunt/slightly rounded tipped bullet.
the enfield sucks ingame, because it would suck in RL. when you normally have an enfield you are an insurgent, and you are fighting a modern day soldier that has thousands of dollars worth of equiptment on. the 30-30 just isnt going to do that much damage to a marines body armor. however he might die from internal bleeding. ( which fits nicely with the long death after only hit an enemy 1 time.)
(just because some thing is a bolt action doesnt mean anything. they have 22lr bolt action rifles, you arnt going to do anything besides piss somebody off shooting them with that.)
-
RAW HOMICIDAL
- Posts: 350
- Joined: 2008-09-08 22:51
Re: lee enfield sucks?
ill admit i was wrong on the caliber. I was in a hurry to get to work, and instead of looking it up I went off of memory.
but if you honestly think that a 22 cal "long rifle" (standard lead bullet) is going to punch through standard body armor, then you might want to reference a different movie. Ive been looking all over the internet trying to find some evidence that this is a problem. Everything that i have found and read is calling the urban legend of the 22lr punching through kevlar is bullsh**. I mean think about if criminals could take out cops or SWAT with their Remington M597s, then i think we would all be in quite a pickle. Considering a M597 runs about $100 in Ohio.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
All of this is really besides the point, what I was trying to make aware was the fact that a rifle is bolt-action doesnt mean that it is automatically a 1 hit kill.
but if you honestly think that a 22 cal "long rifle" (standard lead bullet) is going to punch through standard body armor, then you might want to reference a different movie. Ive been looking all over the internet trying to find some evidence that this is a problem. Everything that i have found and read is calling the urban legend of the 22lr punching through kevlar is bullsh**. I mean think about if criminals could take out cops or SWAT with their Remington M597s, then i think we would all be in quite a pickle. Considering a M597 runs about $100 in Ohio.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
All of this is really besides the point, what I was trying to make aware was the fact that a rifle is bolt-action doesnt mean that it is automatically a 1 hit kill.

[CENTER]"Just let'm Bleed" - Homicidal PRSP Tester
Click Here [thread=55667]
[/thread] Click Here
[/thread] Click Here[/CENTER]
-
bobogaz
- Posts: 59
- Joined: 2008-05-06 11:43
Re: lee enfield sucks?
hey hey, dont worry, found the projectile code thiny, changed it to 50 cal! awesome now. thanks anyway. lol, i once got it to fire the m2a2's 25mm round. 5that was awesome.
-
naykon
- Posts: 113
- Joined: 2007-12-18 12:14
Re: lee enfield sucks?
Lee enfield rocks!!!!! haha i'll choose it over an AK 47 everytime, just because im a brit and feel like its my duty to go on a killing spree with it 
-
blackhatch46
- Posts: 113
- Joined: 2007-09-10 00:14
Re: lee enfield sucks?
RAW HOMICIDAL wrote:ill admit i was wrong on the caliber. I was in a hurry to get to work, and instead of looking it up I went off of memory.
but if you honestly think that a 22 cal "long rifle" (standard lead bullet) is going to punch through standard body armor, then you might want to reference a different movie. Ive been looking all over the internet trying to find some evidence that this is a problem. Everything that i have found and read is calling the urban legend of the 22lr punching through kevlar is bullsh**. I mean think about if criminals could take out cops or SWAT with their Remington M597s, then i think we would all be in quite a pickle. Considering a M597 runs about $100 in Ohio.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
All of this is really besides the point, what I was trying to make aware was the fact that a rifle is bolt-action doesnt mean that it is automatically a 1 hit kill.
well you need to read what i wrote again. i said, it goes through flak jackets without plates. if you know what a flak jacket is it is what police usually wear and it lacks ceramic or kevlar plates. it is flexible and light to be more mobile. you usually add plates to flak armor to make it stop bullets like the ones we are issued. and i know this for a fact because i have taken some old style flak jackets from work (Marines by the way) and shot them with a .22lr. and i will tell you it will go though it. dont tell me to quote another movie because i am actually in the military and i generally know what im talking about when it come to this type of shit, unlike most people that seem to know everything and have done nothing that post on this site. everyone goes off of what they have heard and not many people have experienced it themselves. how about you get a flak and shoot it with a 22 and tell me what happens.
-
thebeanie
- Posts: 119
- Joined: 2009-01-18 05:39
Re: lee enfield sucks?
HAHA!naykon wrote:Lee enfield rocks!!!!! haha i'll choose it over an AK 47 everytime, just because im a brit and feel like its my duty to go on a killing spree with it![]()
This rifle was considered a very accurate rifle in WW2 Also held the record as the fastest firing bolt action rifle, Cant remember exactly how many rounds they got out in a minute..
Also have the 10 round capacity helps
-
waldo_ii
- Posts: 961
- Joined: 2008-04-30 22:58
Re: lee enfield sucks?
You ARE aware that kevlar is not a "plate," but is the material that flak jackets are often made out of? The armor that civilian police often wear consists of multiple layers of kevlar.blackhatch46 wrote:well you need to read what i wrote again. i said, it goes through flak jackets without plates. if you know what a flak jacket is it is what police usually wear and it lacks ceramic or kevlar plates. it is flexible and light to be more mobile. you usually add plates to flak armor to make it stop bullets like the ones we are issued. and i know this for a fact because i have taken some old style flak jackets from work (Marines by the way) and shot them with a .22lr. and i will tell you it will go though it. dont tell me to quote another movie because i am actually in the military and i generally know what im talking about when it come to this type of shit, unlike most people that seem to know everything and have done nothing that post on this site. everyone goes off of what they have heard and not many people have experienced it themselves. how about you get a flak and shoot it with a 22 and tell me what happens.
The problem with the argument here is that you have no agreement on the subject of discussion. A .22LR will certainly go through a vest with only four layers of kevlar, but it might not go through a vest with 30 layers.
A "flak jacket" could mean multiple things; it could be the whole set of body armor, complete with the lower layers of kevlar that are meant to stop stray shrapnel and low-velocity pistol rounds and the heavy, high-protection plates meant to stop rifle rounds, or it could simply be only the layers of kevlar. An "old style" flak jacket could easily just be that; a flak jacket, built to provide protection from flak and shrapnel. A more modern flak jacket will consist of multiple layers of kevlar. The "old style" jacket isn't going to stop a head-on bullet because that was never its purpose. A newer jacket might.
Before we all get our panties all bunched up, agree on the subject of discussion, make sure we are talking about the same standard, and then civilized discussion can follow.
|TGXV| Waldo_II


-
blackhatch46
- Posts: 113
- Joined: 2007-09-10 00:14
Re: lee enfield sucks?
why are you updating me on rifle plates. i wear the shit almost everyday and i have been for the last 6 yrs. im well aware of the type of armor and how plates are used. i was simply stating that the common police style vest would be penetrated in response to the other guy saying that a 22lr would only piss someone off. people often underestimate the 22lr round (along with the 9mm) and they usually have no experience to justify it.waldo_ii wrote:You ARE aware that kevlar is not a "plate," but is the material that flak jackets are often made out of? The armor that civilian police often wear consists of multiple layers of kevlar.
The problem with the argument here is that you have no agreement on the subject of discussion. A .22LR will certainly go through a vest with only four layers of kevlar, but it might not go through a vest with 30 layers.
A "flak jacket" could mean multiple things; it could be the whole set of body armor, complete with the lower layers of kevlar that are meant to stop stray shrapnel and low-velocity pistol rounds and the heavy, high-protection plates meant to stop rifle rounds, or it could simply be only the layers of kevlar. An "old style" flak jacket could easily just be that; a flak jacket, built to provide protection from flak and shrapnel. A more modern flak jacket will consist of multiple layers of kevlar. The "old style" jacket isn't going to stop a head-on bullet because that was never its purpose. A newer jacket might.
Before we all get our panties all bunched up, agree on the subject of discussion, make sure we are talking about the same standard, and then civilized discussion can follow.
-
waldo_ii
- Posts: 961
- Joined: 2008-04-30 22:58
Re: lee enfield sucks?
The way you worded your most recent argument could lead to multiple conclusions.
In the first quoted segment, I marked the phrase "Plates are made up of ceramic or Kevlar" as being false. Kevlar is a fiber produced by DuPont. It is very strong, which is why it is often used in high-quality cable, tires, hoses, and often times in body armor. However, Kevlar products are always similar in that they consist of many strands of Kevlar fibers, not in plates. From what I have read on the Interceptor as produced by DHB Industries (From what I have read online and heard in the media, the plates in the old Interceptor armor are still used in today's improved sets of body armor, just in different packaging), the plates are made of a ceramic material, and it is all held together by Kevlar. The plates themselves are not made of Kevlar.
The phrases marked as "debatable due to definition" are marked as such due to the conflict of definitions even by yourself.
Even still, there is no consensus on what armor is being discussed. There are many different manufacturers of body armor each with many different models. Saying "body armor with 30 layers of Kevlar will/will not stop .22LR" is different from saying "flak jackets do/do not stop .22LR."
I have your words in the first layer of quotation, and the conclusions that one can come to after reading the quotation in the second layer. False conclusions are bold, conclusions that can be debated on due to definition are in italics.I said, it goes through flak jackets without plates. if you know what a flak jacket is it is what police usually wear and it lacks ceramic or kevlar plates. it is flexible and light to be more mobile. you usually add plates to flak armor to make it stop bullets like the ones we are issued. and i know this for a fact because i have taken some old style flak jackets from work (Marines by the way) and shot them with a .22lr. and i will tell you it will go though it. dont tell me to quote another movie because i am actually in the military and i generally know what im talking about when it come to this type of shit, unlike most people that seem to know everything and have done nothing that post on this site. everyone goes off of what they have heard and not many people have experienced it themselves. how about you get a flak and shoot it with a 22 and tell me what happens.
Conclusions: Police wear flak jackets. Police flak jackets do not have plates. Plates are made up of ceramic or Kevlar. Flak jackets are flexible/light/mobile. Plates can be added to flak jackets to stop bullets that are issued to Marines or flak jackets issued to the marines have plates to stop nondescript bullets. Flak jackets can have plates.if you know what a flak jacket is it is what police usually wear and it lacks ceramic or kevlar plates. it is flexible and light to be more mobile. you usually add plates to flak armor to make it stop bullets like the ones we are issued
When we combine two conclusions "flak jackets issued to the marines have plates" and "The .22LR penetrated the jacket from the Marines," you conclude that .22LR penetrates the plates in flak jackets that have plates. I feared that should this debate have continued, this misconception due to unclear wording would have lead to more useless argument. Plus, it degrades your credibility when outrageous statements are made, such as the false conclusion that is implied by the wording.Conclusions: I am from the Marines. I took an old Marine flak jacket and shot it with .22LR. The .22LR penetrated the jacket from the Marines.i have taken some old style flak jackets from work (Marines by the way) and shot them with a .22lr. and i will tell you it will go though it.
In the first quoted segment, I marked the phrase "Plates are made up of ceramic or Kevlar" as being false. Kevlar is a fiber produced by DuPont. It is very strong, which is why it is often used in high-quality cable, tires, hoses, and often times in body armor. However, Kevlar products are always similar in that they consist of many strands of Kevlar fibers, not in plates. From what I have read on the Interceptor as produced by DHB Industries (From what I have read online and heard in the media, the plates in the old Interceptor armor are still used in today's improved sets of body armor, just in different packaging), the plates are made of a ceramic material, and it is all held together by Kevlar. The plates themselves are not made of Kevlar.
The phrases marked as "debatable due to definition" are marked as such due to the conflict of definitions even by yourself.
- "if you know what a flak jacket is it is what police usually wear and it lacks ceramic or kevlar plates" implies that flak jackets do not have plates.
- "you usually add plates to flak armor to make it stop bullets like the ones we are issued" can imply that flak jackets can have plates.
Even still, there is no consensus on what armor is being discussed. There are many different manufacturers of body armor each with many different models. Saying "body armor with 30 layers of Kevlar will/will not stop .22LR" is different from saying "flak jackets do/do not stop .22LR."
|TGXV| Waldo_II


-
ballard_44
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 1204
- Joined: 2007-05-30 22:47
Re: lee enfield sucks?
Speaking of that, the discussion is fine, but move it to the appropriate forum if you'd like to continue to talk about things that attempt to stop other things from killing you.
