|TG| TacticalGamer.com (old)
-
Portable.Cougar
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 2007-03-03 01:47
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
Do I think all Arabs are terrorists?
No
Do I aprove of chanting allahu akbar at all times?
No
Do I aprove of chanting I just killed you all with a IED?
No
Braggers and show offs do not have a place in our community. I for one see your chanting islamic sentacnes the same as the the kid who screems "fail Dam", "who was the squad I just knifed?" and so on. We pride ourselfs on being the PRIMIERE community for Mature Gamers. Show off behavior and the inability to sepreate reality (allahu akbar ) from a video game, is not accepted at TG.
If you would like your ban removed please by all means vist us at the link provided in my sig. If you have no disire to be unbanned please do not use this forum to express that fact.
This thread is for feedback on our server as a community.
"Map list should have...x"
"Why are the rules ...x"
If you feel that our community should be bashed please by all means make a Tactical Gamer forum account. We will be more than willing to hear your complaints and work with you to fix what ever problem you may have.
As far as your ban goes.
You were banned by myself for disrepecting other players. Please vist our "contact and Admin" section as linked in my sig.
No
Do I aprove of chanting allahu akbar at all times?
No
Do I aprove of chanting I just killed you all with a IED?
No
Braggers and show offs do not have a place in our community. I for one see your chanting islamic sentacnes the same as the the kid who screems "fail Dam", "who was the squad I just knifed?" and so on. We pride ourselfs on being the PRIMIERE community for Mature Gamers. Show off behavior and the inability to sepreate reality (allahu akbar ) from a video game, is not accepted at TG.
If you would like your ban removed please by all means vist us at the link provided in my sig. If you have no disire to be unbanned please do not use this forum to express that fact.
This thread is for feedback on our server as a community.
"Map list should have...x"
"Why are the rules ...x"
If you feel that our community should be bashed please by all means make a Tactical Gamer forum account. We will be more than willing to hear your complaints and work with you to fix what ever problem you may have.
As far as your ban goes.
You were banned by myself for disrepecting other players. Please vist our "contact and Admin" section as linked in my sig.

-
JohnnyTheIED
- Posts: 452
- Joined: 2009-01-01 20:13
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
Since when is saying "allahu akbar" impersonating a terrorist?snooggums wrote:First, TG is aimed at mature players, not people who think that doing 'impersonations' of terrorists is funny
Since when is the Iraqi Resistance terrorists?
Go read your dictionnary.
You insulted me right there and then DARE to go call for an admin to warn me when I answer.
Hypocrits. I wont even post in this joke sub-forum anymore. Y'all already 1 sided in this lobotomy.
"As far as your ban goes.
You were banned by myself " -Cougar
P.S: MORE LIES, Cougar never even SAW me in their server! I was banned about a YEAR ago by a TG-6th. I NEVER ASKED FOR UNBAN HERE. Get your facts straight. I give FEEDBACK to whoever wants to read it. Make it a big deal and they'll only read that. That's your problem.
Obviously you're people have shown their colors here. "impersonating terrorists" LMFAO! Gimme a break!
Stop "impersonating brainwashed US soldiers". (oh we can play that game too)
----------------------
PS: If you cannot stand "terrorists" or INSURGENTS you REALLY aren't playing the right game. "mature" lol.
Last edited by JohnnyTheIED on 2009-05-13 14:44, edited 1 time in total.

-
d1sp0sabl3H3r0
- Posts: 439
- Joined: 2007-07-03 20:57
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)

Sorry for the crappy resolution.
A couple of quick notes:
1) Several of our current admins have or are currently serving members of the US military.
2) They have been in Iraq and Afghanistan
3) They have a right to be offended by someone yelling Allah Akbar (or however you want to spell it)
4) They certainly don't need me defending them, but I will anyway
5) You were not banned from our server for saying it
6) Snoogums is not an admin at TG, so arguing with him about your ban is pointless, whether it is in this forum or any other.
Lastly, I think it's time to invoke this, which is stickied at the top of this forum:
You've complained about your ban and your perceived mentality of the admins. Please follow the guidelines established by the moderators of this forum from now on.Just a quick note to everyone:
The Project Reality forums are not to be used as a platform for users to rant/debate being kicked or banned from game servers.
If you are banned for not following a servers rules or server administrators orders and would like to protest or express your feelings on the matter, do so on the corresponding clans/squads website, not here.
This will not be tolerated and can result in your Project Reality forum account being banned.
-Slick
Have a nice day.
-
snooggums
- Posts: 1093
- Joined: 2008-01-26 06:33
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
I'm not going to address the massive list of assumptions, but this made me laugh.JohnnyTheIED wrote:Go read your dictionnary.
-
fuzzhead
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 7463
- Joined: 2005-08-15 00:42
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
JohnnyTheIED, you've said your bit about TG, whether you choose to appeal your ban or not is up to you but no need to continue this argument here, thank you.
-
RustyBandSaw
- Posts: 121
- Joined: 2005-09-14 21:15
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
Cougar's B.O. is killing me.
-
Jigsaw
- Posts: 4498
- Joined: 2008-09-15 02:31
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
Just something that I have brought up before regarding this server; the kick for supporting player policy.
Yesterday around 04.00BST I was leading my "DM ENG TW" squad on Jabal on US. We were operating as mechanized infantry with support provided by Sandiford's APC squad and the teamwork between the squads was great, utilising mumble to its full potential. My squad were the best on the team and combined the 2 squads had more than half the points and kills total of the team.
Then I got kicked. My clanmate who would have been the one to take over my squad in the event of me disconnecting, was also kicked 10 seconds later for the same reaon. Neither of us had been on the server very long, we had bothed joined mid-game on the previous round (Asad Khal).
I just cannot understand a kick policy that can detract from the teamplay and experience in this way. I understand that TG supporting members pay for the server and have the right to come on and play but other servers have different policies which accomplish the same thing for example having an admin who can choose who to kick rather than a (as far as I can see from the above) random script. Why not kick an afk'er or a lone wolf squad? Just not the SL and NCO of the best squad on the team.
Other than that its a good server and as I think I showed above you can find some great teamwork and fun rounds but its spoilt by the kick policy. I remember the 1st great round I ever had of PR which was on TG and that was spoilt at the end by the exact same thing.
Disappointed.
/Feedback
Yesterday around 04.00BST I was leading my "DM ENG TW" squad on Jabal on US. We were operating as mechanized infantry with support provided by Sandiford's APC squad and the teamwork between the squads was great, utilising mumble to its full potential. My squad were the best on the team and combined the 2 squads had more than half the points and kills total of the team.
Then I got kicked. My clanmate who would have been the one to take over my squad in the event of me disconnecting, was also kicked 10 seconds later for the same reaon. Neither of us had been on the server very long, we had bothed joined mid-game on the previous round (Asad Khal).
I just cannot understand a kick policy that can detract from the teamplay and experience in this way. I understand that TG supporting members pay for the server and have the right to come on and play but other servers have different policies which accomplish the same thing for example having an admin who can choose who to kick rather than a (as far as I can see from the above) random script. Why not kick an afk'er or a lone wolf squad? Just not the SL and NCO of the best squad on the team.
Other than that its a good server and as I think I showed above you can find some great teamwork and fun rounds but its spoilt by the kick policy. I remember the 1st great round I ever had of PR which was on TG and that was spoilt at the end by the exact same thing.
Disappointed.
/Feedback
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CKjNcSUNt8
"I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end... "
"I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end... "
-
Charity Case
- Posts: 179
- Joined: 2008-02-15 22:27
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
The supporting member kick script is set to kick based on time on the server. Whenever a SM joins, the script will kick the player who has been playing the longest and is not a supporting member. The TG PR community has over 100 supporting members, so the kicks can get pretty rapid during prime-time and weekends.
While I am a supporting member, I often play without my script enabled, and I don't find kicks to be too much of a problem. If you'd like, PM me and I'll give you some insight into how the script works
. Also, TG is in the process of reviving password nights, which will probably run every Thursday and Sunday, with Sunday events being held at Euro-friendly times. As there are fewer people joining due to the password, these events allow non-SMs to get in more uninterrupted gametime. Check out the TG PR forums for information on upcoming events: Battlefield 2 - Project Reality Mod - Tactical Gamer.
As I said, PM me for more info on the supporting member system.
While I am a supporting member, I often play without my script enabled, and I don't find kicks to be too much of a problem. If you'd like, PM me and I'll give you some insight into how the script works
As I said, PM me for more info on the supporting member system.
-
Elektro
- Posts: 1824
- Joined: 2009-01-05 14:53
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
goddamn it i hate when it says 62/64 and i cant join
its a great server and i have to wait 10mins b4 i can join
-
d1sp0sabl3H3r0
- Posts: 439
- Joined: 2007-07-03 20:57
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
Believe me, we all understand how frustrating it is to be kicked for supporting members in the middle of a round. The same thing happened to every current supporting member before they became supporting members, too.
Unfortunately, there is no perfect system to it and the fairest way that was worked out was to kick based on time played on the server. It doesn't discriminate on asset in use, role on the team, points, anything. It just makes room for a player that financially supports the server and the community to be able to play on the server that they help pay for out of their pocket. Could you imagine the outrage if we didn't allow those that pay for the community to exist to ever be able to join the server they pay for?
We are victims of our own success. The popularity of the server has increased the number of supporting members which has then caused a decrease in the number of non-supporting members that can join and reduced the amount of time that those that can join get to enjoy on the server.
As far as adding intelligence to the script, that isn't going to happen. If we allow pilots to remain, how fair is that to those that don't get into the planes or helicopters? If we allow SLs to stay, the squads will all be started by players who wish to exploit that portion of the script regardless of their intent to be a good SL and work together with the team. If we allow the CO to remain, what happens to the 30 other players on the team (although at least there would be a CO that round) and what if the player who takes the CO position has no intention of actually fulfilling that role and helping the team but instead takes it to keep from being kicked? There just isn't a system that works well for both sides of the issue except for the time played on the server.
As Charity mentions, there are a few "tricks" to the kick system. Again, pm either him or myself and we'll help you as we can.
Unfortunately, there is no perfect system to it and the fairest way that was worked out was to kick based on time played on the server. It doesn't discriminate on asset in use, role on the team, points, anything. It just makes room for a player that financially supports the server and the community to be able to play on the server that they help pay for out of their pocket. Could you imagine the outrage if we didn't allow those that pay for the community to exist to ever be able to join the server they pay for?
We are victims of our own success. The popularity of the server has increased the number of supporting members which has then caused a decrease in the number of non-supporting members that can join and reduced the amount of time that those that can join get to enjoy on the server.
As far as adding intelligence to the script, that isn't going to happen. If we allow pilots to remain, how fair is that to those that don't get into the planes or helicopters? If we allow SLs to stay, the squads will all be started by players who wish to exploit that portion of the script regardless of their intent to be a good SL and work together with the team. If we allow the CO to remain, what happens to the 30 other players on the team (although at least there would be a CO that round) and what if the player who takes the CO position has no intention of actually fulfilling that role and helping the team but instead takes it to keep from being kicked? There just isn't a system that works well for both sides of the issue except for the time played on the server.
As Charity mentions, there are a few "tricks" to the kick system. Again, pm either him or myself and we'll help you as we can.
-
SgtBragg
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 2009-01-24 03:25
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
d1sp0sabl3H3r0 check your pm's.
-
RememberTheAlamo
- Posts: 173
- Joined: 2009-02-12 00:58
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
more than awesome!!!!!!!!
-
Rudd
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 21225
- Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
consistently great games last night, varied maplist, great communication, a little lag - but the gameplay made up for it.
server score is 9.5/10
great job!
server score is 9.5/10
great job!
-
Brummy
- Posts: 7479
- Joined: 2007-06-03 18:54
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
The server's gotten a lot better than it was around .75 ~ .8 tbh. I like it 
-
trxjw
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 2009-05-09 01:44
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
Great server. Always very quick for me (Pennsylvania, USA) and lots of great players and teamwork! Gonna give Mumble a go tonight.
-
nicaragua700
- Posts: 50
- Joined: 2009-03-04 22:30
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
meh....had some horrible times on their servers but i cant say its their fault
-
AnimalMother.
- Posts: 2476
- Joined: 2007-02-25 15:38
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
good server, love the teamwork and the attitude of most players.
however has feedback goes i'd really look into the kick policy, i agree that people paying get priority but kicking the longest playing non-paying member is imo the most frustrating/annoying/daftest way of doing it.
if it were reversed then it'd make more sense to me, shortest time played. if i had just joined and got kicked for a playing member i'd be annoyed of course, but less annoyed because i'd probably not have done much i wouldn't have got immersed into the game. also i'd imagine its not that much of a problem for you in this respect but you have some guy that helps seed the server get it going, they've put time and effort in and possibly sat through some boring times just for them to get kicked when the thing finally gets going, seems like a nice way of rewarding them.
that aside i do enjoy playing on TG, and give you a good 9/10. thanks
however has feedback goes i'd really look into the kick policy, i agree that people paying get priority but kicking the longest playing non-paying member is imo the most frustrating/annoying/daftest way of doing it.
if it were reversed then it'd make more sense to me, shortest time played. if i had just joined and got kicked for a playing member i'd be annoyed of course, but less annoyed because i'd probably not have done much i wouldn't have got immersed into the game. also i'd imagine its not that much of a problem for you in this respect but you have some guy that helps seed the server get it going, they've put time and effort in and possibly sat through some boring times just for them to get kicked when the thing finally gets going, seems like a nice way of rewarding them.
that aside i do enjoy playing on TG, and give you a good 9/10. thanks
ex |TG-31st|
AnimalMotherUK - YouTube
AnimalMotherUK - YouTube
vistamaster01: "I just dont get people with girl usernames/pics/sigs lol,
for example I thought AnimalMother was a girl
ops:"
Arte et Marte
for example I thought AnimalMother was a girl
Arte et Marte
-
Jevski
- Posts: 397
- Joined: 2007-03-16 02:39
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
But how would you feel, if you just joined the server after waiting 10 minutes to get in, play 2 mins. just to get kicked again, and do it all over again?
-
AnimalMother.
- Posts: 2476
- Joined: 2007-02-25 15:38
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
alot less pissed had i been playing with the same guys for endless rounds having some of the best PR rounds and really getting into it.Jevski wrote:But how would you feel, if you just joined the server after waiting 10 minutes to get in, play 2 mins. just to get kicked again, and do it all over again?
ex |TG-31st|
AnimalMotherUK - YouTube
AnimalMotherUK - YouTube
vistamaster01: "I just dont get people with girl usernames/pics/sigs lol,
for example I thought AnimalMother was a girl
ops:"
Arte et Marte
for example I thought AnimalMother was a girl
Arte et Marte
-
d1sp0sabl3H3r0
- Posts: 439
- Joined: 2007-07-03 20:57
Re: |TG| TacticalGamer.com (USA)
Thanks for the feedback! Animal is one of those PR players that we love to have on the server, and I've had the pleasure of squadding with him before and can attest to how good he is. Hope to continue to see you on TG.Sars99 wrote:good server, love the teamwork and the attitude of most players.
however has feedback goes i'd really look into the kick policy, i agree that people paying get priority but kicking the longest playing non-paying member is imo the most frustrating/annoying/daftest way of doing it.
if it were reversed then it'd make more sense to me, shortest time played. if i had just joined and got kicked for a playing member i'd be annoyed of course, but less annoyed because i'd probably not have done much i wouldn't have got immersed into the game. also i'd imagine its not that much of a problem for you in this respect but you have some guy that helps seed the server get it going, they've put time and effort in and possibly sat through some boring times just for them to get kicked when the thing finally gets going, seems like a nice way of rewarding them.
that aside i do enjoy playing on TG, and give you a good 9/10. thanks



