Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Post Reply
Peeta
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2008-11-28 02:05

Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by Peeta »

I would like to see an improved deployable object placement system, not unlike the Sandbox object placement. Like when you try to place something, it would be highlighted in red or in green depending on if the placement would work.... Or just any kind of signal to the SL that the placement would work or not. Thanks!
Panem Today,
Panem Tomorrow,
Panem Forever.
Ace42
Posts: 600
Joined: 2007-07-26 23:12

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by Ace42 »

Fighter wrote:I would like to see an improved deployable object placement system, not unlike the Sandbox object placement. Like when you try to place something, it would be highlighted in red or in green depending on if the placement would work.... Or just any kind of signal to the SL that the placement would work or not. Thanks!
Even just a "nuhuh, it'll splat you" message would be nice. The number of times I've seen people go down just because the deployment area is MARGINALLY too small for a FB, and there's so much other stuff between that zone and the SL / squad members that it appears meters and meters away from where the SL TRIED to place it...
Image
LithiumFox
Posts: 2334
Joined: 2007-07-08 18:25

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by LithiumFox »

I think maybe more of a confirmation sign is more to what you would be wanting ?

Like a green "glow" is applied to where it would appear? That would be better..

Sandbox style would = bad

XD People would be killed by floating things of death

Now if we could get that but have it be similar to the "transparency" of dead people (meaning it's a static that you can walk through, like trees and such) and then it loads the ACTUAL static, that would be kinda nice... =)

[url=http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f112-pr-bf2-tales-front/91678-universal-teamwork-oriented-player-tag.html]
Peeta
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2008-11-28 02:05

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by Peeta »

LithiumFox wrote:I think maybe more of a confirmation sign is more to what you would be wanting ?

Like a green "glow" is applied to where it would appear? That would be better..

Sandbox style would = bad

XD People would be killed by floating things of death

Now if we could get that but have it be similar to the "transparency" of dead people (meaning it's a static that you can walk through, like trees and such) and then it loads the ACTUAL static, that would be kinda nice... =)
That's exactly what I meant!

EDIT: Bolded items....
Last edited by Peeta on 2009-05-19 01:09, edited 1 time in total.
Panem Today,
Panem Tomorrow,
Panem Forever.
McBumLuv
Posts: 3563
Joined: 2008-08-31 02:48

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by McBumLuv »

The only way a sandbox thing would be bad is when using assets to block off entrances, but I don't think that would be extremely exploitable.

AS to people using them to kill you, you have some serious problems if you get kill by someone 5 meters from you with a big floating asset that screams "shoot me" :p
Image

Image

Image
Spuz36
Posts: 533
Joined: 2007-08-11 11:52

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by Spuz36 »

I don't know, I played the new version of Sandbox and noticed some PR models (vehicles I think) in it for deployables, so maybe a 'trade' of some sort happened and maybe something is in the works. But, thats just a silly theory of mine and am probably jumping to conclusions too quick.

Yea and to build off McLuv, don't have them waving around as a personal shield :P Also, if someone could lift someone on a building or something as an exploit, but now that hooks are so abundant it would probably be ok'ish. I'm sure limits can be put on it to prevent that, but a Sandbox 'way' would be useful, to actually see the object before placement.
TimeMasheen
Posts: 40
Joined: 2008-12-12 02:01

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by TimeMasheen »

when i squad lead, i kill about 1/500 troops, i just know how each stuff is placed, and i ALWAYS tell my squadies to stay "BEHIND" me and you wont die

I do agree, it could use some work but i dont know if bf2 engine supports it (not my subject)
LithiumFox
Posts: 2334
Joined: 2007-07-08 18:25

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by LithiumFox »

well at least the glowing ring of "STAY OUT OF THIS AREA DAMN YOU" maybe?

[url=http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f112-pr-bf2-tales-front/91678-universal-teamwork-oriented-player-tag.html]
Mary.au
Posts: 131
Joined: 2009-02-05 23:30

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by Mary.au »

Dont you just love it when you explicitly state, "Stay behind me", and half your squad runs ahead and is killed by your new firebase.

A system that can prevent that would be awesome
Durkie
Posts: 264
Joined: 2009-01-12 08:10

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by Durkie »

Some sort of glowing circle on the ground where it will come would be nice
You can see where your firebase will come and you squad members will hopefully stay out of the circle :razz:
"Goddam it, you'll never get the Purple Heart hiding in a foxhole! Follow me!"
Captain Henry P. Jim Crowe
K3V1N=US=
Posts: 29
Joined: 2009-01-02 16:00

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by K3V1N=US= »

Its good the way it is IMO.

The only problem that can occur with the current system is the stupidity of fellow squaddies, if i place something and give them a warning like. Watch out im placing a fob over VOIP and they run forward and get killed i can only laugh at their stupidity, no feeling sorry.
Image
cyberzomby
Posts: 5336
Joined: 2007-04-03 07:12

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by cyberzomby »

Resuggestion. not sure what came out of the first one. If this cant be done because of hard-code issues do this:

Observer marker where you want to place: walk back 5 meters for small placements and 10 for the firebase. Works like a charm! It drops 5 or 10 meters (depends what you chose) right in a front line. So keep that in mind when looking around.
Peeta
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2008-11-28 02:05

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by Peeta »

Yes, but I signal to you that the placement will work. I'm tired of getting try again in a better location everytime I try to place something and then end up running out of a build order and/or blowing up the crates because it went down in some wild horrid place.
Panem Today,
Panem Tomorrow,
Panem Forever.
smee
Posts: 516
Joined: 2007-11-15 10:43

Re: Improved Deployable Object Placement System

Post by smee »

I would settle with not getting killed or killing someone.
3 x 22" samsung 226bw. Matrox triplehead Quad Pro Q6600 "LGA775 Kentsfield" 2.40GHz (1066FSB) OC 3.2 , 8gb's of 1066mhz ram. 9800GTX OCX. 520mb. 3 x 320gbs samsungs. raid 0

Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”