Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
TY2D2
Posts: 433
Joined: 2007-06-07 05:21

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by TY2D2 »

If someone in my squad is alone fighting the enemy or pinned down or whatever it may be...

Why in the world wouldn't I go back? That means there are other players to kill, and I am primarily a killer when I play PR. Unless I am transporting people on Qwai or setting IEDs in Basrah.

The priority for me isnt saving that player, but more or less, to kill the enemy making all that racket in the distance.

Now, there are a select few times when I have felt all RPG-ish and thrown everything out to save a SL in need, but that would only be for MastaLock, not some random pubber :P
Image
First Strike Developer
ASF Clan Leader
LeChuckle
Posts: 664
Joined: 2007-02-09 13:53

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by LeChuckle »

Adriaan wrote:Hahah, if i remember well, it was LeChuckle who got shot when we had to retreat for the sheer quantity of enemies on our tail.. Minor detail though :razz: , it was epic sure enough! Too bad the round ended just as we managed to escape.

I agree, if it´s people running off no matter what the SL tells them and getting into trouble, they will have to sort it themselves. You´d probably get kicked from the squad anyway.
killed by some random grenade while sprinting like crazy
Tartantyco
Posts: 2796
Joined: 2006-10-21 14:11

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by Tartantyco »

-This is a cost/benefit issue. Most of the time it's not cost effective.
Make Norway OPFOR! NAO!
ImageImage
It's your hamster Richard. It's your hamster in the box and it's not breathing.
Conman51
Posts: 2628
Joined: 2008-05-03 00:27

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by Conman51 »

The point of playing is to be entertained.

You have to be alive to have fun.

I like it when me and others have fun.

I keep my squad alive.


so yes i do think squad members should help each other and random friendlies too.

it pisses me off when an apc or helicopter goes with only half my squad.

All this only applies to good squad mates.

If a squad mate goes rambo and start yelling for a medic and back up all the way across the map then yea f^&k em
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog."
-Mark Twain



Image
PLODDITHANLEY
Posts: 3608
Joined: 2009-05-02 19:44

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by PLODDITHANLEY »

Yes...but in PR dead guys come back a minute later makes a big change compared to IRL.
I am very often medic and if I could drag injured guys into cover that would make leaving no one behind more of an option.
I have only ever played on Public servers and there the people are virtually always too quick too run and too slow to observe, this will always be a difference between IRL where guys want to get home to see their kids after!
I think for PR if the squad is together I will try to bring everyone back, but suppresive fire is rare, and the medic has 9 epipens but only two smoke grenades!
What would happen if PR was one death only per map, would we see better gameplay I think so, knowing if you die its over till the map changes or you change server.
rampo
Posts: 2914
Joined: 2009-02-10 12:48

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by rampo »

PLODDITHANLEY wrote:Yes...but in PR dead guys come back a minute later makes a big change compared to IRL.
Its a question of principles :wink:
Image
Dunehunter
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 12110
Joined: 2006-12-17 14:42

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by Dunehunter »

As a squad leader on the BLUFOR side on an insurgency map, I will do my best to get the entire squad out. OPFOR? You die, too bad, you're expendable :p

[R-MOD]Jigsaw] I am drunk. I decided to come home early because I can''t realy seea nyithng. I hthknk i madea bad choicce. :|
cyberzomby
Posts: 5336
Joined: 2007-04-03 07:12

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by cyberzomby »

Jonny wrote:If some iraqi infantry got cut off, do you seriously think they would be a high priority for the iraqi army to save as enemy tanks approach their capital city?
Not for the Iraqi army at that moment. But they had an entirely different army rules, lifestyle and training.

The Marines get trained with the: leave no man behind, and I think they wouldnt. Theres also a lot of books describing trying to rescue downed pilots in the vietnam war.

Ontopic tho: I only do it if they have a valuable kit ;) Im trying to keep my squad together and alive more than I would risk it all to get that guy up. I can just let him die and he'll get 1 death and respawn at RP, FB or even Main. Yea thats bad :( Now that I read this thread ;)
wookimonsta
Posts: 681
Joined: 2008-08-31 13:16

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by wookimonsta »

depends.
is the person holding a limited kit? if so, what kit, if its a automatic rifleman, i might be willing to let it go, if its a HAT, then im gonna try and get him.
Did I ask him to go there and do things, if yes, I will probably try. If no, I will think, was this person acting in the interest of the squad/team or was he just running around like an idiot and was nothing but a good bullet magnet. If its the first, I will try, if its the last I probably wont.
Also depends on how long this will take, if i have to walk 10 minutes I say fuck that.
Also depends on wether or not I still have an rp up and enough people alive. If its only him and one other guy and my rp is down, Ill try and get him.

Also depends on gametype. if its insurgency i might say fuck it, simply because loosing one ticket isnt worth the risk of loosing 6 and killing the enemy has little gain. If its AAS i will probably try to flank his attackers.
cyberzomby
Posts: 5336
Joined: 2007-04-03 07:12

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by cyberzomby »

Ofcourse it isnt in a scenario like that. But I can also write up a whole scenario to prove my point. So I think its not a solid argument.
Sntff
Posts: 32
Joined: 2009-05-18 05:52

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by Sntff »

Jonny wrote:...Its not worth lossing a million lives in an attempt to save a few thousand.
Even if one of them is John Connor? ;)
jbgeezer
Posts: 908
Joined: 2008-06-10 15:30

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by jbgeezer »

It is depending on the situation. If I am in a realistic mood, I might try really hard. However if there is a rally or FB really close to us, I would mabey let him die. Still, PR is really much trying to stay alive and keep you teammates alive.
Live by the sword, die by the sword...

Ingame:G-LockCobra
http://www.youtube.com/user/sotemot
Wicca
Posts: 7336
Joined: 2008-01-05 14:53

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by Wicca »

Well, a real life example would be the Paratroopers trapped in that city during the invasion of Germany. And Pattons army came and gave a gateway to deliver supplies (they didnt get rescued as far as i know)
Xact Wicca is The Joker. That is all.
Masterbake
Posts: 363
Joined: 2009-03-13 16:34

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by Masterbake »

Yes unless it's Grottim.

Then I'm chief mediwhore.


CB! PR divison is recruiting - http://www.commandobastards.com
Smuke
Posts: 877
Joined: 2007-09-25 16:21

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by Smuke »

Whenever you have a man down, you should make it your squads prioty to get that person back up and alive.

HOWEVER, if getting to him will cost your more deaths, or if you have to evac quickly, its probably best to leave him and respawn. But only in those type of cases.
Image
In-Game Name: SmukeUK
Wild_Bill: Smuke, you are a true ninja!.
Scot
Posts: 9270
Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by Scot »

Depends who it is, if it's a serious nub, then they can stay there :p
Image
Royal_marine_machine
Posts: 183
Joined: 2008-12-07 11:15

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by Royal_marine_machine »

As a Medic rather than SL, I do say leave No Man behind, I get lots of points ;)

Not only that but, if the person was acting under our SLs orders, then it's kind of harsh to just let them die and have to respawn, kit or no kit, they are worth saving.

Also, a half decent medic can revive someone anywhere, even in the middle of the road, so theres no excuse for leaving no man behind. If your lad or a couple of your lads are cut off and surrounded, it should be a priority of the rest of the squad to rescue them, regroup, and carry on. I also play as commander, I would hate to see squads throw away tickets for reason, even if they do try to save the two squad members, this may cost more Medics, but will inflict more if succsessful.
Interested In airsofting, but feeling the pinch of the credit crunch?
http://budgetairsoft.webs.com
goguapsy
Posts: 3688
Joined: 2009-06-06 19:12

Re: Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

Post by goguapsy »

Adriaan wrote: Heh, i will spare you the witty comment, as i suppose you mean "poll" :-P
But no, i don´t know how..
lol! XDD
Guys, when a new player comes, just answer his question and go on your merry way, instead of going berserk! It's THAT simple! :D

Image[/CENTER]
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”