Do you consider "Leaving no man behind" while playing?

[goguapsy]

I like to think this would be the case, but in reality, nobody would assign an inordinate ammount of ammunition and materials to 'save' a person who is most likely already dead. The fact is that in full scale warefare (not counter insurgency operations), individual lives cease to be important.

man, I hope u never be a soldier in RL...

And we r talking about PR. there is NO case where a guy will be 200 miles away...

and if the guy is 200 miles away its different. and one thing... whoever said that soldiers are like brothers is absolutely right (im not a soldier tho, but i believe it. watch saving private ryan or band of brothers, or even play call of duty 4, u know what is not to leave no man behind.)







AND SRY FOR DOUBLE POST GUYS

[burghUK]

If someone falls behind it means they were a) a rambo b) a bad player c) not worth saving.

If someone is in that kind of situation i always leave them unless of course im flying and they require CAS.

[goguapsy]

So i was playing a little... and I forgot about this thread. I'm gonna put my leave no men behind skills in action again!

[Gore]

I like a squad that stays together so yes

[Metal_militia_103]

I always keep the squad together and moving forward. I try to have each SM perform a specific role when I am SL. Without even just one of those players, the squad could be wiped out. i.e - specialist is down and we need to get over a wall; else we get blown to bits by enemy APC