You're thinking of 7.62x51 NATO, not the 7.62x39 Wasaw Pact used in the AK-47/AK-47M/AKM. The NATO is essentially a shortend .30-06 round with a more pointed bullet and better propellants and so is simply a full power rifle round. The WP on the other hand is an intermediate cartrage. It is much less pointed and hasnt got nearly as much propellant. At short ranges, such as those encounted in Veitnam it will out perform the M16 on penetration easily, however, due to is heavy weight and short cartrage, it has a very parabolic trajectory at longer ranges making it usuitable for anything over 300m, this reflects the original design peramiters as a very powerful SMG, not an assault rifle.'[5NFSO wrote:Thunder']i cant find much info on the 7.62 round to back this up, but im sure a 7.62 can go through a brick wall at a 1mile.
its reliablity is the cause of its lack of accuracy, all the parts are losely fitting meaning it can be full of sand/mud/water and keep firing, but the parts aint as well machined as the nato rifle, but the soviets didnt care their doctrine was to pull up in a apc and hose the area down with 7.62 rounds as that much lead could only be a good thing.
i watch alot of programs about weapon systems, and alot of time these programs contridict each other its hard to build up a accurate picture of these weapon with out using them
Also, against modern body armour the 7.62x39 lacks penetration. This was demonstated in the battle of Falluja when insurgent forces armed with various kinds of AKs had to ambush the attacking US marines to attempt to get a face shot, because other wise, chances are that the marine will survie. Then again, if you can lay your hands on the 193 grain AP ammo, it'll punch trough most body armour on the 2nd shot.
And if you really want to see scary bullet effets, you want to see .223 M193 ammo fired through a 1:14 twist barrel. Its stupidly inaccurate, but when it hits it'll tear limbs off.
Remember - You can kill nearly anything with an AK-47 but almost nothing can kill an AK-47!




