Commander Support-Choices

[Raic]

JDAM just needs to be tweaked. Currently if it was possible to choose between the two the JDAM would only we used if there was a need for epic smoke grenade

Maybe JDAM should magically spawn more after explosions witch are soundless and without any visual effect but kill the people around so they can't hide in buildings or in a ditch just under the explosion.

[McBumLuv]

I support giving more indirect capabilities to the commander, definitely.

[TempesT]

More Area Attacks please. Area attacks can break stale-mates and generally alter the game in exciting ways. This idea is good.

[Expendable Grunt]

Tempting, but how would it feel to be on the constant recieving end of bombardment like that?

M.

[Hunt3r]

More Area Attacks please. Area attacks can break stale-mates and generally alter the game in exciting ways. This idea is good.

Well, how about just sending in a-10s and f-16s to bomb them to oblivion?

[billdan]

then what about those few maps that don't have jets?

[SkaterCrush]

More Area Attacks please. Area attacks can break stale-mates and generally alter the game in exciting ways. This idea is good.

I don't think the commander needs any more area attacks. With the new UAV and just commanding in general (something many people overlook) the commander has got his hands full. I do agree with the option of either JDAM or Artillery though, but before this is implemented the JDAM needs a change. Although maybe going against my statement at the start of this post, it would be interesting for something that you could do instead of a mortar strike.

[SkaterCrush]

Read what I wrote.

I'm not suggesting the commander get any more area attacks. I'm suggesting that he get to pick between the existing choices when he calls one in.

I wasn't talking about you, I sort of should have quoted Tempest. I'm agreeing with what your saying

/Gibbs slap

[AfterDune]

/Gibbs slap

I lolled .