Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Locked
stealth420
Posts: 256
Joined: 2009-09-29 19:59

Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by stealth420 »

I am suggesting this re work of the map kozelsk because half the time when the server switches to this map, about 60% leave the server because the map really sucks.

<a href="http://photobucket.com/images/kozelsk%20overview" target="_blank"><img src="http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j290/ ... cnc_64.png" border="0" alt="kozelsk overview Pictures, Images and Photos"/></a>

Here is the overview , do you see the big ocean on the bottom left of the map. Its a big body of water and its enough to support a carrier.

Is it possible to re work this map and add a russian carrier ?

You could lose the russian main base and have the russian APCs spawn at the bottom of carrier just like US muttrah/jabal for example.

You could also move the 2 russian tanks to the Chechan side and give the russians Hind atack helicopters and sea cow transports.

This would make the map 100% more fun than it is now.
MonkeySoldier
Posts: 1200
Joined: 2008-08-10 21:03

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by MonkeySoldier »

Roflmao. It looks more of a lake then a sea, tbh.

This is more of a 'because we can' suggestion.
Image
jbgeezer
Posts: 908
Joined: 2008-06-10 15:30

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by jbgeezer »

It would require an all new model for the carrier. Also "Admiral Kuznetsov", russias only carrier, is an aircraft carrier, not an amfibous assault carrier like the USS Essex.
Live by the sword, die by the sword...

Ingame:G-LockCobra
http://www.youtube.com/user/sotemot
snooggums
Posts: 1093
Joined: 2008-01-26 06:33

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by snooggums »

So you are suggesting adding air support and a landing requirement for the map? How would that make it more fun? What would giving the tanks to the other side improve?

The map is a land based assault with the water limiting the advancement, just like mountains and other terrain. It isn't there just to put a boat into, and adding assets doesn't improve all maps.

Currently the Russians have tanks and the Chechyns have Spandrels to counter the tanks. The Spandrels can make use of the water to flank the tanks so the water can and is used. Additionally I haven't seen large masses of people leave due to changing to this map. maybe that is a server specific issue?
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by Rudd »

You could also move the 2 russian tanks to the Chechan side and give the russians Hind atack helicopters and sea cow transports.
and then we realised it was all a dream.

The maps problems are rooted in its AASv3 base imo, and the lack of a 32 layer featuring air power.
Image
TheLean
Posts: 483
Joined: 2009-03-15 20:26

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by TheLean »

This idea is so crazy it has potential to be great :!:
DankE_SPB
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3678
Joined: 2008-09-30 22:29

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by DankE_SPB »

you guys know where actually Kozelsk is? it pretty funny to see carrier there, like old joke about submarine in steppe of Ukraine
Here
Image
[R-DEV]Z-trooper: you damn russian bear spy ;P - WWJND?
jbgeezer
Posts: 908
Joined: 2008-06-10 15:30

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by jbgeezer »

DankE_SPB wrote:you guys know where actually Kozelsk is? it pretty funny to see carrier there, like old joke about submarine in steppe of Ukraine
Here
Thats Kozelsk?? :confused: hmm, yeah Its not top 10 ideas ever :razz:
Live by the sword, die by the sword...

Ingame:G-LockCobra
http://www.youtube.com/user/sotemot
Peeta
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2008-11-28 02:05

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by Peeta »

Why don't we add a sea monster because we can? The 25 post limit on the Suggestions Forum is there for a reason.
Panem Today,
Panem Tomorrow,
Panem Forever.
DankE_SPB
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3678
Joined: 2008-09-30 22:29

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by DankE_SPB »

jbgeezer wrote:Thats Kozelsk?? :confused: hmm, yeah Its not top 10 ideas ever :razz:
yep, there are missile silos around it
ICBM sites
Image
[R-DEV]Z-trooper: you damn russian bear spy ;P - WWJND?
Fenrir07
Posts: 83
Joined: 2008-04-29 15:41

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by Fenrir07 »

stealth420 wrote:This would make the map 100% more fun than it is now.
I disagree.
IMHO those suggestions of yours would ruin the map.

Did you know Chechnya is a landlocked region? ;)
Herbiie
Posts: 2022
Joined: 2009-08-24 11:21

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by Herbiie »

DankE_SPB wrote:yep, there are missile silos around it
ICBM sites
scary.

Neway it dm where it is irl - that doesn't look anything like the ingame map anyway!
RememberTheAlamo
Posts: 173
Joined: 2009-02-12 00:58

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by RememberTheAlamo »

jbgeezer wrote:It would require an all new model for the carrier. Also "Admiral Kuznetsov", russias only carrier, is an aircraft carrier, not an amfibous assault carrier like the USS Essex.
As jbgeezer had said Russia only has one aircraft carrier
Jigsaw
Posts: 4498
Joined: 2008-09-15 02:31

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by Jigsaw »

As previously stated the 25 post limit for the suggestion forum is there for a very very good reason.

In addition, things that would need to happen in order for this to become a reality:
  • Someone would need to make a Russian carrier model. Since (as stated) Russia only have 1 aircraft carrier, this would also be unrealistic in every sense.
  • Someone would have to model, texture, code and export a Hind that is suitable for use in PR.
  • Someone would have to move Chechnya (afaik only God has this kind of mapping skill) so that it is not entirely land-locked.
IMHO Kozelsk is a rather brilliantly constructed map as it is, despite being hindered slightly by the AASv3 gamemode which occasionally does not show the map in the glory that it can achieve. I do however agree that air assets would be lovely and would provide an excellent alternative to the heavy armour layer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CKjNcSUNt8
"I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end... "
Tim270
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 5166
Joined: 2009-02-28 20:05

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by Tim270 »

I fail to see how Kozelsk would be good for air assets in anyway, how are you going to clear a forest with choppers? only a few LZ's also. Its a great map as it is.
Image
Bob_Marley
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7745
Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by Bob_Marley »

Moved to the suggestion forum for being a suggestion.

Locked for being totally impractical and unrealistic.
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Image
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
epoch
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4091
Joined: 2007-04-07 14:16

Re: Kozelsk could use a russian carrier

Post by epoch »

Jigsaw wrote:
  • Someone would have to move Chechnya (afaik only God has this kind of mapping skill) so that it is not entirely land-locked.

I LOL'd at that.

Kozelsk is a great map. It's a pity people leave a server when it comes on, but those that are left, and those that subsequently join, clearly appreciate it for what it is.


[R-MOD]Cp: epoch if I wasn't dancing right now I'd shoot you.
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”