Future US Maps?
-
Outlawz7
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 17261
- Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59
Re: Future US Maps?
What defines 'US map' here? As far as I know, each one also has an opposing faction. You could consider Kashan Desert a US map, but it could also be a MEC map.

-
Peeta
- Posts: 1204
- Joined: 2008-11-28 02:05
Re: Future US Maps?
All maps should be converted into the USMC versus the US Army.
Really no need for any other factions, they are just wasting space.
Just a completely unbiased opinion from an American.

@outlaw: Any map with US on it, I would guess
Panem Today,
Panem Tomorrow,
Panem Forever.
Panem Tomorrow,
Panem Forever.
-
Drunkenup
- Posts: 786
- Joined: 2009-03-16 20:53
Re: Future US Maps?
I think its about time we increase the amount of asset heavy maps. Right now, we only have one Army map thats combined arms, and thats the only one that has Jets. Only 1 map with the Apache for the Army. Same with the USMC, theres only one map with a Cobra, and none with Jets at all. If not the Army, the USMC should at least get one more 4x4 Combined Arm's map. If its not the Cobra's I want to fly (I can, but they're so abused and useless on Muttrah) I'd at least would like to see some USMC jet support in the form of the Harrier or F/A-18.
-
=Romagnolo=
- Posts: 4765
- Joined: 2006-12-29 14:52
Re: Future US Maps?
WOW, what is that ?!
[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto:"Cheers, you're the man, Okita"
[R-DEV]Rhino:"I in fact got kicked from a server for tking."
Hitperson:"well done, treasure it forever."
[R-DEV]Adriaan:"Damned classy Roma, if I may say so."
[R-DEV]Chuc:"Pro man, pro." (yes, it was about me)
[R-MOD]BloodBane611:"Romagnolo, you definitely deserve a LOL award for that."
[R-DEV]Rhino:"I in fact got kicked from a server for tking."
Hitperson:"well done, treasure it forever."
[R-DEV]Adriaan:"Damned classy Roma, if I may say so."
[R-DEV]Chuc:"Pro man, pro." (yes, it was about me)
[R-MOD]BloodBane611:"Romagnolo, you definitely deserve a LOL award for that."
-
Zulnex
- Posts: 622
- Joined: 2009-03-23 22:12
-
USMCMIDN
- Posts: 981
- Joined: 2009-07-25 16:32
Re: Future US Maps?
Well c i joined the USMC at 17 and I love the corps and for some reason I just find it boring playing US Army (I have nothing against the army, and I know that we would never go into war with china so I don't really play PLA maps either (plz I dont want a discussion about if the US will go to war with China if you think different message me... Looking into the current operations in Afghanistan I was mainly focused on another USMC map vs Taliban in Afghanistan with armor, Cobras, UH attach and transport (Huey), LAV etc... I mean i do not think that would be an over kill because people have a hard enough time beating the Taliban on Archer as it is. What do you guys think? Maybe the mod after .9?
-
Silly_Savage
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: 2007-08-05 19:23
Re: Future US Maps?
To me, it looks like a 4km, Zatar Wetlands remake. That's a good thing in my opinion.=Romagnolo= wrote:WOW, what is that ?!
USMC vs. MEC.
"Jafar, show me a sniper rifle." - Silly_Savage 2013
-
OkitaMakoto
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 9368
- Joined: 2006-05-25 20:57
Re: Future US Maps?
3 pages for any signs of excitement? I think I'll keep quiet=Romagnolo= wrote:WOW, what is that ?!
-
Duckmeister
- Posts: 124
- Joined: 2007-09-25 21:44
Re: Future US Maps?
Guys, I think he means USMC maps, not US Army maps. To which I agree, we need more USMC maps, less US Army maps.
-
USMCMIDN
- Posts: 981
- Joined: 2009-07-25 16:32
Re: Future US Maps?
yes as I said above I dont have anything against US Army its just I like playing the branch I joined up as lol and I hate PLA maps because it would never happen but MEC maps I could see happening in a way... So any future USMC maps vs Taliban?Duckmeister wrote:Guys, I think he means USMC maps, not US Army maps. To which I agree, we need more USMC maps, less US Army maps.
-
Kruder
- Posts: 803
- Joined: 2007-04-05 10:26
Re: Future US Maps?
Did u know that probably %90 of the players dont care if its US army or USMC?They are same.
-
mat552
- Posts: 1073
- Joined: 2007-05-18 23:05
Re: Future US Maps?
Never say neverUSMCMIDN wrote: I hate PLA maps because it would never happen
On topic, tbh who the factions are is less important than the maps themselves.
Players might be hardcoded, but that sure doesn't seem to stop anybody from trying.
The only winning move is not to play. Insurgency, that is.
The only winning move is not to play. Insurgency, that is.
-
burghUK
- Posts: 2376
- Joined: 2007-10-18 13:33
Re: Future US Maps?
US are spoiled. Brits need more maps back.
-
HughJass
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: 2007-10-14 03:55
Re: Future US Maps?
you see a fictional army fighting the USA instead of a real army fighting the USA.USMCMIDN wrote:yes as I said above I dont have anything against US Army its just I like playing the branch I joined up as lol and I hate PLA maps because it would never happen but MEC maps I could see happening in a way... So any future USMC maps vs Taliban?
...lol...
I think we just need less maps with rivers.
-
Rudd
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 21225
- Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32
Re: Future US Maps?
Every Team needs more mapscrAck_sh0t wrote:US are spoiled. Brits need more maps back.
I'm working hard to help the Brits though
-
Duckmeister
- Posts: 124
- Joined: 2007-09-25 21:44
Re: Future US Maps?
The US Army is not the same as the USMC, both in real life and in PR.Kruder wrote:Did u know that probably %90 of the players dont care if its US army or USMC?They are same.
-
mat552
- Posts: 1073
- Joined: 2007-05-18 23:05
Re: Future US Maps?
In PR the difference is barely noticeable. The M4 and M16 are presented as the same gun, to the point that I can't actually remember off the top of my head if they don't just both use the M4. The AT systems and armor are the same, the majority of air power provided is the same, the only intimidate difference is the transport helicopters, but most people don't pilot.Duckmeister wrote:The US Army is not the same as the USMC, both in real life and in PR.
Another difference I just recalled. On USMC maps you have the LAV, on US A maps you have the Stryker. But then again USMC maps are amphibious in nature, so there's no point for them to have a stryker anyway.
West Faluja is an oddball that defies me.
Last edited by mat552 on 2009-10-26 03:07, edited 1 time in total.
Players might be hardcoded, but that sure doesn't seem to stop anybody from trying.
The only winning move is not to play. Insurgency, that is.
The only winning move is not to play. Insurgency, that is.
-
SgtDil
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 2008-10-20 01:01
Re: Future US Maps?
Agreed. Brits realy need more mapscrAck_sh0t wrote:US are spoiled. Brits need more maps back.
-
USMCMIDN
- Posts: 981
- Joined: 2009-07-25 16:32
Re: Future US Maps?
if you look at their gear it resembles the same gear as Iranian soldiers use and carry. Look up Iranian military pics... Standard weapon is the G3. And its a middle Eastern setting.HughJass wrote:you see a fictional army fighting the USA instead of a real army fighting the USA.
...lol...
I think we just need less maps with rivers.
-
TheValkyre
- Posts: 23
- Joined: 2009-02-23 00:32
Re: Future US Maps?
I just want more maps with the US (preferably the USMC) against the Taliban. Korengal Valley is my absolute favorite map and would love to see more maps like the fighting going on in Afghanistan, and maybe putting the Brits in there too? The USMC and Brits are my favs. But i would also love to see alot more combined arms maps, I dont care what faction, everybody knows they love a good round on Kashan. 







