L85

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Technoelite
Posts: 632
Joined: 2007-06-19 16:37

Re: L85

Post by Technoelite »

and for some reason also it is the better idea if u wanna go automatic with the iron sights as it much more controlable especally on CQB maps
Image
Image
BogusBoo
Posts: 197
Joined: 2009-10-20 15:15

Re: L85

Post by BogusBoo »

But do keep in mind the realistic need for scopes, i mean so what if its easier to shoot with the irons? its more of a challenge and you feel like one of those soldiers in the frontline, thats the reason why most people play PR. if you want fun, run, and gun accurate ironsights with no realism i would say go play BF2.....sorry if im a bit um...enthusiastic? or pushy? :-D
Colonel, Founder and Proud Leader of the Crossfire Gaming Coalition.
Arnoldio
Posts: 4210
Joined: 2008-07-22 15:04

Re: L85

Post by Arnoldio »

The ironsight version ingame is better IMO. I always use it, its somewhat extremely accurate in CQB aswell on longer distances. I have more control of the weapon and can put quick and accurate suppressing fire, as with SUSAT its harder because your screen is moving everywhere and its hard to go full auto.

For long ranges, i use my other squad member with me, cannot wait for 0.9 marksmans, thats gonna help much more than now :D
Image


Orgies beat masturbation hands down. - Staker
Nebsif
Posts: 1512
Joined: 2009-08-22 07:57

Re: L85

Post by Nebsif »

I never go for the Iron sight L85, as it owns in CQB even with SUSAT, and I have it on full auto most of the time, it owns Iron sights G3 on Asad Khal in CQB so eazy. The L85 is my favorite wep btw, luuuuuuuv it!!!!1
rampo
Posts: 2914
Joined: 2009-02-10 12:48

Re: L85

Post by rampo »

Nebsif wrote:I never go for the Iron sight L85, as it owns in CQB even with SUSAT, and I have it on full auto most of the time, it owns Iron sights G3 on Asad Khal in CQB so eazy. The L85 is my favorite wep btw, luuuuuuuv it!!!!1
Nothing own's ironsight G3 :wink:
Image
Herbiie
Posts: 2022
Joined: 2009-08-24 11:21

Re: L85

Post by Herbiie »

gazzthompson wrote:Image

the new sa80a2 in action
That's an L85A2 RAC, the carbine version developed for the Royal Armoured Corps for them to carry in their tanks. Most troops don't use foregrips.

P.S I do know they are Royal Marines - but it's mostly used by the Royal Armoured Corps.
abbadon101
Posts: 87
Joined: 2008-12-30 13:17

Re: L85

Post by abbadon101 »

From what I understand (having spoken to several Infantry officer currently serving) the L85A2 is getting new optics (ACOG) and some have been fitted with the railed forgrip, the frogrip is a replacement as needed program (as the rifles need replacement/repair) rather than the ACOG which was issued to most combat arm units in deployment.
Bob_Marley
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7745
Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39

Re: L85

Post by Bob_Marley »

The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Image
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
Herbiie
Posts: 2022
Joined: 2009-08-24 11:21

Re: L85

Post by Herbiie »

No I am talking about the RAC Carbine. As a member of the Royal Armoured Corps methinks me knows.

It si slightly (SLIGHTLY) shorter than a standard L85A2 so therefore is a carbine - and also has rails on. it's called an L85 A2 RAC, originally designed for the Royal Armoured Corps it's now being distributed to some other poor buggers.
Element66
Posts: 130
Joined: 2008-08-25 18:44

Re: L85

Post by Element66 »

Herbiie wrote:No I am talking about the RAC Carbine. As a member of the Royal Armoured Corps methinks me knows.
did you even look at the links gazz provided?
Image
Smegburt_funkledink
Posts: 4080
Joined: 2007-11-29 00:29

Re: L85

Post by Smegburt_funkledink »

Herbiie wrote:No I am talking about the RAC Carbine. As a member of the Royal Armoured Corps methinks me knows.
We all know what the L22A1 carbine is and the differences between that and the SA80a2, Mr Thompson has posted sources to back that up (kinda) that I can also perform with a quick google search to find it but I can't seem to find this 'RAC Carbine' you're on about. I can't see any info about any variants called the 'RAC Carbine' in the SA80 family.

The L22 is used by armoured crews of which the RAC will be part of, are you sure this 'RAC Carbine' isn't the same thing? In which case this:

Image

Isn't an L22.

I'm no expert, I'm just seeking clarification...

EDIT: Ok, somehow you've ninja added to your post with more explanation but I still can't find info about it.
[R-Div]Robbi "There's nothing more skanky than eating out of a tub of hummus with a screwdriver."
[R-DEV]Matrox "CHINAAAAAAA!!!"
Herbiie
Posts: 2022
Joined: 2009-08-24 11:21

Re: L85

Post by Herbiie »

Element66 wrote:did you even look at the links gazz provided?
Yes I did it showed piccys. Pictures of what is even called in the last 1 an RAC.

Originally Developed for does not mean used by ;)
superhunty123
Posts: 70
Joined: 2009-08-31 19:03

Re: L85

Post by superhunty123 »

Herbiie wrote:Yes I did it showed piccys. Pictures of what is even called in the last 1 an RAC.

Originally Developed for does not mean used by ;)
Gaz is right...
Gaz
Posts: 9032
Joined: 2004-09-23 10:19

Re: L85

Post by Gaz »

Herbiie wrote:No I am talking about the RAC Carbine. As a member of the Royal Armoured Corps methinks me knows.

It si slightly (SLIGHTLY) shorter than a standard L85A2 so therefore is a carbine - and also has rails on. it's called an L85 A2 RAC, originally designed for the Royal Armoured Corps it's now being distributed to some other poor buggers.
As an Infantry Support Plt Sgt and SAA Instructor with 16AA having done a few years myself, I'm telling you that you're wrong. That is the L85A2 with the new RIS (with foregrip come bipod) that replaces the previous green plastic front handgrip, along with the ACOG, currently deployed (since HERRICK 8 ) to all teeth arms units in theatre.

L22A1's barrel would end where the L85A2's new RIS system ends. There is no such weapon in any British Armoury that goes by the name, or indeed designation of ''L85A2 RAC".
Last edited by Gaz on 2009-10-30 20:29, edited 4 times in total.
Image
"By profession I am a soldier, and take pride in that fact. But I am prouder, infinitely prouder, to be a father". - Gen Douglas MacAurthur.
-Proud wearer of motorcycle helmets since 1998.
Robbi
Posts: 3564
Joined: 2008-07-05 14:53

Re: L85

Post by Robbi »

[R-DEV]Gaz wrote:As an Infantry Support Plt Sgt and SAA Instructor with 16AA having done a few years myself, I'm telling you that you're wrong. That is the L85A2 with the new RIS (with foregrip come bipod) that replaces the previous green plastic front handgrip, along with the ACOG, currently deployed (since HERRICK 8 ) to all teeth arms units in theatre.

L22A1's barrel would end where the L85A2's new RIS system ends. There is no such weapon in any British Armoury that goes by the name, or indeed designation of ''L85A2 RAC".
Say no more :roll:
Image
Image
CareBear
Posts: 4036
Joined: 2007-04-19 17:41

Re: L85

Post by CareBear »

RAWRRR!!
PEWPEWPEWPEWPEW
Image
BogusBoo
Posts: 197
Joined: 2009-10-20 15:15

Re: L85

Post by BogusBoo »

Um..this isnt an arguement about links, or some gun pics.....its about the devs putting scopes to replace the irons...so will you devs at least think about it?
Colonel, Founder and Proud Leader of the Crossfire Gaming Coalition.
Undies
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1112
Joined: 2006-12-01 15:20

Re: L85

Post by Undies »

Mate, sorry to say it but Gaz is absolutely correct, heres what you are talking about:

Image

Look at the difference in size, its much smaller than the one in the picture.
Image
Image
"The cavalry bring a bit of panache and flair to an otherwise dull affair"
Robbi
Posts: 3564
Joined: 2008-07-05 14:53

Re: L85

Post by Robbi »

BogusBoo wrote:Um..this isnt an arguement about links, or some gun pics.....its about the devs putting scopes to replace the irons...so will you devs at least think about it?
[R-DEV]Gaz wrote: We are looking into overhauling the L85A2s, however it's not within 0.9's scope.
Just read the thread and you shall have your answer ;)
Image
Image
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”