[Weapon] MG3

EnermaX · Post by **EnermaX** » 2009-11-02 18:32

Simply awesome

Salmonella · Post by **Salmonella** » 2009-11-02 20:10

pretty impressive, but, what textures size/polycount are you using? it seems 9Kpolys with 4096tex, a little bit too much

MaxSalvatore · Post by **MaxSalvatore** » 2009-11-02 22:16

What will be the system requirements of 0.9?

Post by **Amok@ndy** » 2009-11-02 22:29

the same like bf2 lol

Spaz · Post by **Spaz** » 2009-11-02 22:36

Amok@ndy wrote:the same like bf2 lol

Actually a little higher.

Post by **Amok@ndy** » 2009-11-02 22:43

sure some more room on the hd lol

Post by **Spec** » 2009-11-02 22:53

No, it's really much higher. BF2 runs without a problem on my PC, PR is a pain at the moment.

General Dragosh · Post by **General Dragosh** » 2009-11-03 06:42

Oh my god O.O

Maxfragg · Post by **Maxfragg** » 2009-11-03 06:42

guys, PR is the reason to upgrade

Bringerof_D · Post by **Bringerof_D** » 2009-11-03 06:53

Maxfragg wrote:guys, PR is the reason to upgrade

lol yeah, it was the same deal for me, the moment i realized i couldnt play when 0.8 came out i immediately went to my "source" and picked up a new Geforce 9800 gt for $80 can.

Post by **Kaijleor** » 2009-11-03 17:09

Salmonella wrote:pretty impressive, but, what textures size/polycount are you using? it seems 9Kpolys with 4096tex, a little bit too much

Tricount is below 6k and the texture is 2048x2.

Post by **motherdear** » 2009-11-03 17:47

a 2048x2 texture jesus christ, i assume that that is a normal and a diffuse, and then that you have a spec next to that ?

MMad · Post by **MMad** » 2009-11-03 18:05

Looks insanely good.

Looking forward to laying down some suppressing fire with it.

Post by **Kaijleor** » 2009-11-04 07:33

[R-CON]motherdear wrote:a 2048x2 texture jesus christ, i assume that that is a normal and a diffuse, and then that you have a spec next to that ?

2 textures, diffuse and normal, specular is the alpha channel in diffuse and opacity is the alpha channel in the normal texture.

Post by **motherdear** » 2009-11-04 08:09

affirmative

always good to know that stuff since i haven't had much time working with textures yet, but 2048 is huge lol, but i guess that since it's 1 player it's fine

Expendable Grunt · Post by **Expendable Grunt** » 2009-11-04 14:36

I feel dumb because I don't know about texturing

M.

Mad-Mike · Post by **Mad-Mike** » 2009-11-04 22:02

nice work, good job

Bellator · Post by **Bellator** » 2009-11-04 23:52

Although its very pretty, and I can't wait to use it, I very much like the current MEC LMG, and with a scope it would have been perfect. Its sad to let it go. If the current LMG is discarded and is replaced with the apparently less CQC effective MG3, I think the MEC will lose a solid CQC weapon (which they lack). It'll hamper my preferred way fighting with the MEC LMG. Although frankly I scarcely use the LMG, but still.

My suggestion is that the current LMG would become the optics version, while the MG3 would be reserved as the ironsights LMG for the MEC. It would give some diversity to their weaponry, i suppose. MEC is after all a multinational force of somekind, perhaps a little haphazardly formed (so they might not have 100% uniformity), and IIRC, even the US military has more than one LMG type.

Dev1200 · Post by **Dev1200** » 2009-11-05 03:35

what factions will use the MG3? Possibly insurgents?

[Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3

Re: [Weapon] MG3