Barret M Sniper Rifles Acceptable?

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Zeno
Posts: 3430
Joined: 2008-09-07 14:16

Re: Barret M Sniper Rifles Acceptable?

Post by Zeno »

Cheesygoodness wrote: What reason do you want the weapon ingame? Give some facts / reasons why it should be added to the game for realism sake and for practicality's sake.

as you said: "disable enemy vehicles"

it can take out light vehicles at 1km without having the trouble to rearm as the lat/hat and it doesnt leave a huge cloud of smoke.

and you say that "Its also much farther range then you can engage in PR"

both the norwegian maps are 4km with viewdistances of: mine 1,8km and wicca 1,6km so that shouldnt be a problem ;-)
Image
[R-DEV]Ninja2dan: Not having a spotter is like masturbating with a cheese grater...mildly amusing at first, but generally painful and bloody in the end.

Thornehaw: If all this have been evidently true, Battlefield is a much scarier and dirtier than ever imagined. Not a conspiracy, but a possibility. If it is true, then trusting another is quite worrisome.
SkaterCrush
Posts: 1173
Joined: 2009-04-13 19:07

Re: Barret M Sniper Rifles Acceptable?

Post by SkaterCrush »

4km SQUARE. Big difference. And you reminded me of the view distance which is something like 800m on most maps? That isn't even the range of an M24, so why do you need something that can shoot even farther than the view distance when the sniper you already have can shoot farther than what you can see?
Image
Image
Image
Zeno
Posts: 3430
Joined: 2008-09-07 14:16

Re: Barret M Sniper Rifles Acceptable?

Post by Zeno »

because it can disable light vehicles and its used IRL.
Image
[R-DEV]Ninja2dan: Not having a spotter is like masturbating with a cheese grater...mildly amusing at first, but generally painful and bloody in the end.

Thornehaw: If all this have been evidently true, Battlefield is a much scarier and dirtier than ever imagined. Not a conspiracy, but a possibility. If it is true, then trusting another is quite worrisome.
SkaterCrush
Posts: 1173
Joined: 2009-04-13 19:07

Re: Barret M Sniper Rifles Acceptable?

Post by SkaterCrush »

Yeah but it cannot be coded to actually disable them, therefore it is useless.
Image
Image
Image
Zeno
Posts: 3430
Joined: 2008-09-07 14:16

Re: Barret M Sniper Rifles Acceptable?

Post by Zeno »

it can damage it so much that it starts to burn = they have to bail = disabled
Image
[R-DEV]Ninja2dan: Not having a spotter is like masturbating with a cheese grater...mildly amusing at first, but generally painful and bloody in the end.

Thornehaw: If all this have been evidently true, Battlefield is a much scarier and dirtier than ever imagined. Not a conspiracy, but a possibility. If it is true, then trusting another is quite worrisome.
Hitman.2.5
Posts: 1086
Joined: 2008-03-21 20:54

Re: Barret M Sniper Rifles Acceptable?

Post by Hitman.2.5 »

Nimise wrote:Still whats the point. As I said earlier snipers are already 1 shot kill
You shot any one in the head recently with anything smaller than a 50 round? because if you have they may have been revived because it is only the 50 or bigger that can kill to the head IIRC.
Derpist
SkaterCrush
Posts: 1173
Joined: 2009-04-13 19:07

Re: Barret M Sniper Rifles Acceptable?

Post by SkaterCrush »

Zeno wrote:it can damage it so much that it starts to burn = they have to bail = disabled
So then you can two shot a humvee? Its not a LAT dude, its a sniper
Image
Image
Image
Jazz
Posts: 128
Joined: 2009-04-19 17:45

Re: Barret M Sniper Rifles Acceptable?

Post by Jazz »

I only think the gun should be implemented if it comes with akimbo uzis.
Cheesygoodness
Posts: 226
Joined: 2007-05-03 23:06

Re: Barret M Sniper Rifles Acceptable?

Post by Cheesygoodness »

Zeno wrote:it can damage it so much that it starts to burn = they have to bail = disabled

Disabling a vehicle and destroying it are two different things.

Blowing a tire off the rim is disabling a vehicle. Putting 4 rounds of .50 cal fire into the side and having it blow up is different.

Besides the .50 cal is already used on light vehicles yes? The M2 on the humvee? It takes more then 4 rounds to disable a vehicle as you put it. Its impossible to simulate the required accuracy to disable it without putting like a weak spot. That doesn't negate the fact a .50 caliber bullet to the tire would make a humvee explode.
Image
Proof that cheese love is better then any other.
[R-DEV]Cheeseman: "As tempting as the woman in Katarn’s avatar might be I'd still pick Cheese if I had to decide between either one. :( "
MonkeySoldier
Posts: 1200
Joined: 2008-08-10 21:03

Re: Barret M Sniper Rifles Acceptable?

Post by MonkeySoldier »

Jazz wrote:I only think the gun should be implemented if it comes with akimbo uzis.
*facepalm* You forgot the 25 killstreak nuke. :roll: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

But why on earth do we need a .50 cal sniper rifle? Snipers (don't like 'em in PR) are there to provide l4z0r support for CAS. (Even though it usually doesn't happen) They should be co-ordinating with other units, rather then also have the ability to take out other vehicles. They should be a link, not the killer. Why would snipers bother to co-ordinate at all, if they can take out ~50% of the vehicles themselves with this weapon? They won't, because they can all do it by themselves. It will only encourage lone-wolfing, and rushing/ tk'ing for the .50 cal sniper kit. I'd say no.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”