Just a quick question, and dont get me wrong i dont wanna arge about the G3A3, but how come a nation at war against a NATO nation ( lets say U.S. vs Arabian coalition ) could be equip by NATO made weapons ?
did HK G3A3 and MG3 is widely used in Anti-Western country ?
Once again dont get me wrong i dont wanna argue, i just wanna some explanation thank you =D
Question related to G3A3.
-
Tim270
- PR:BF2 Developer
- Posts: 5166
- Joined: 2009-02-28 20:05
Re: Question related to G3A3.
Could the MEC not have bought the rights to produce the weapons themselves?

-
Rudd
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 21225
- Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32
Re: Question related to G3A3.
Heckler & Koch G3 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
this is what Wiki says
this is what Wiki says
he G3 was and in some cases continues to be produced under license in: France (MAS), Greece (Hellenic Arms Industry), Iran (Defense Industries Organization), Mexico, Myanmar, Norway (Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk), Pakistan (Pakistan Ordnance Factories), Portugal (FBP), Saudi Arabia, Sweden (FFV), Thailand, Turkey (MKEK) and the United Kingdom (Royal Ordnance).[5]
-
Hotrod525
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: 2006-12-10 13:28
Re: Question related to G3A3.
AAAh ok now i understand'[R-CON wrote:Rudd;1229860']Heckler & Koch G3 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
this is what Wiki says


