[New for 2010!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

[Lange]

High got a laptop with a Geforce GT230M and a i7 processor so no problem lol.

[Gossy*AUS*]

All high, 8XAA, and the FPS never drops below 80, average over 100, until a jdam goes off and I'm close to it. Then it drops to about 20

[Celestial1]

Previously ran on a custom built rig (AMD 6400+ Dual core 3.0 GHz? 8800GT 256Mb, 2Gb RAM, Windows XP) at medium/high mix (that darn gfx card killed it for me... I'll have to retrieve it from back home and slap a radeon 5xxxHD and some more RAM and windows 7 on it...)


Now playing on a Macbook Pro (only computer at my disposal), all high with a max fps of 100+. Currently amped up some of the settings through nvidia and I think I may have boned up a vsync setting so it doesn't seem to leave 60fps these days. Whatever, it all works and I know what it can do.

Haven't dropped to -25 (noticeable stuttering) fps, and never witnessed a drop below 50 fps as of yet.

Specs on the Macbook Pro:

Unibody 2009 model
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.8 GHz
4 GB 1067 Mhz DDR3 RAM
Nvidia 9600M GT 512Mb

[flyboy_fx]

running at an average of 90fps on high, shoving the detail up with teh nvidia control panel.

I have Nvidia and I know my computer can handle it but when on high I lag some

[Pirate]

PUMPED TO THE MAX

[JeffCole]

I'm generally on a high setting with only the textures on medium due to some memory errors and CTDs since 0.9

[Meza82]

all highest setting except for anti-aliasing (however you spell it) which is lowest

[Arnoldio]

High high high

[killonsight95]

Low now thanks to 0.9 : i can put it on medium to high but i can't fly

[Volodnikov]

All high with 8x AA, except I have dynamic shadows turned off. It improves performance and doesn't have that much of a visual impact on the game. Works out pretty nicely.

[XxxGrANdmA]

Can play on high except for textures on medium (CTD because of memory errors) Get good fps on some maps(kashan, silent eagle) but bad on others (fallujah, gaza) However, this will hopefully be fixed in a patch.

[mangeface]

I run on the high road, and don't seem to experience the problems with crashing like others have.

[shadyshifty]

i run it on medium getting 50-60 fps

[GrimSoldier]

High, Voted low last time finally got a new comp that can actually run games.

[karambaitos]

high dynamic lighting off I dont like it especially on small arms makes it unrealistic
i haz laptop xD

[Poi_Medic]

High AAx2 @ 1920 x 1080

[Shaihuluid]

not many "low" graphics settings

I see a potential dev power play in the makings. argh....

[QuinBones]

everything on low and 800x600, only way I can play without lag making it unplayable.

new computer arrived same time as .9 did so I can't compare it with .87

but my specs:
2GB (1GB x 2) 800MHz DDR2
AMD Athlon II X2 245 (65W) Dual-Core Socket AM3, 2.9GHz, 2MB L2 Cache
Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H Socket AM2+ AMD 785G + SB710 Chipset ATI Radeon HD 4200 Graphics
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (OEM)
and a 500gb HDD

[xtremeqban]

On low (still some "lag"), seems im never going to get a new comp for several more years.