Project Reality 0.9 - Performance Reporting Template

[Dorkweed]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 64bit
* CPU : AMD Phenom II x4 3.21 GHz
* Graphics Card : Nvidia Geforce 8800gt
* Amount of RAM : 4GB
* Sound Card : Intergrated


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1600x1200

* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : Off
* Texture Filtering : High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Not significant, but I could notice it wasn't performing as high as it was in .87


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
9


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Lashkar Valley


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
I always notice it near/in the poppy/corn fields


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
All of them, have yet to play any of the new AAS maps, only insurgency. will update as I play them.

[bloodthirsty_viking]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows Xp Media center edition version 2002 Service Pack 3
* CPU : pentuum (R) D cpu 3.00GHz
* Graphics Card :RADEON X300 128MB HyperMemory
* Amount of RAM :3.75 GB
* Sound Card : all i know is that it is sigmatel


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :800X600

* Terrain :MEd
* Effects :low
* Geometry :low
* Texture :med
* Lighting :low
* Dynamic Shadows :low
* Dynamic Light :low
* Anti-Aliasing :low
* Texture Filtering :low



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes, i used to get arround 30-60 fps in intense battles, now just walking i get 5-10


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

5- I have not been able to really play acept one or to map...

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Dragon-fly averaged 5 fps... (really the only UNPLAYABLE MAP i have tried)
i had about 15 at the train depo, >5 for the feild in the north...


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Above


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
I had some preformance issues, but by far, it was the least on beirut averaged 20fps
Iron ridge was.. ok....slow, but ok...playable-avereaged 17 or so fps
Archer was the other map i played... i averaged about... 21 FPS..

[Snares]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 64 bit, fully patched
* CPU : Q6600 OC'd to 3.2
* Graphics Card : Radeon HD3870
* Amount of RAM : 4 GB, DDR2 800 5-5-5-12
* Sound Card : X-Fi XtremeMusic
* All drivers are updated; using Daniel K's X-Fi Support Pack 2.0 for X-Fi, and Catalyst 10.1 for HD3870.

BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1680x1050

* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : 8X
* Texture Filtering : High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

8

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Dragon Fly, Fallujah West, Operation Archer, Beruit

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Dragon Fly has issues with hard faults (the game has to access the page file, which gives you the random FPS spikes, usually). My commit charge is extremely high, sometimes around 5-6 GB. Usually, I suffer the most FPS drops when in the city.

Archer has problems with low FPS, usually around to the west of the main village.

Fallujah has low FPS when in the south part of the map, on the main highway, and it sometimes has issues when at the north insurgent main.

Beirut has random FPS spikes when flying a helicopter towards the city. One moment everything is fine, the other moment, your screen is frozen for five seconds.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Oddly, there are almost no performance issues with Gaza Beach.

Pretty much all of the AAS maps work great, except for Silent Eagle and Beirut.

No big problems with any of the Insurgency maps that I have tested except for those listed. Lashkar Valley does have some low FPS spots, such as traveling on the main road through the village on a bike (going that fast takes a lot of rendering power), but nothing major.

[Punkbuster]

Jaymz;1257227']System Specifications

• Operating System : Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bits
• CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.00 GHz
• Graphics Card : Palit GeForce 9800GT Super+ 1GB of GDDR3
• Amount of RAM : 2GB of DDR2 memory @ 400 MHz
• Sound Card : Realtek HD Audio (Built in)

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1680 x 1050

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : Medium
• Texture : Medium
• Lighting : Medium
• Dynamic Shadows : Medium
• Dynamic Light : Medium
• Anti-Aliasing : x0
• Texture Filtering : Medium

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

No



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
when I had Windows XP... I would have given it 10/10 I was getting 110-120 FPS with no lag at all nor crashes...
but now on Windows 7 I start with 80 FPS and in like an hour it become 10-40FPS so I give it 7/10

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
__________________________________________________________________________

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
__________________________________________________________________________

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

__________________________________________________________________________

[Pariel]

System Specifications

Operating System : Windows 7 (64 bit)
CPU : Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz
Graphics Card : Nvidia 8600M GT
Amount of RAM : 4 GB
Sound Card : Onboard

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : 1440 x 900

Terrain : Medium
Effects : Medium
Geometry : Medium
Texture : Medium
Lighting : Medium
Dynamic Shadows : Medium
Dynamic Light : Medium
Anti-Aliasing : Off
Texture Filtering : Medium



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes. In 0.87 my graphics were set as below, getting approximately 30 FPS.

Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 2x
Texture Filtering : High

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

Before turning down the graphics: 4
On current graphics settings: 8

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Lashkar Valley
Dragon Fly

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Lashkar Valley - Stuttering (had previously played Gaza Beach on the same server with no issue), not due to frame rate (which was staying in the 30's).

Dragon Fly - unplayable frame rates (3-6 FPS) in the city, mainly single digits. Absolutely fine over the the rest of the map though.

Had no issues playing Yamalia with graphics turned down (around 30 FPS).

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Gaza Beach -- was playing on 0.87 setting with no difficulty

[Pvt.SmittY15]

System Specifications

Operating System : Windows XP 64 Bit
CPU : AMD Athlon 3400+
Graphics Card : ATI Radeon 4850 HD 1 GB
Amount of RAM : 3 GB
Sound Card : I don't Know

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : 1440x900
Terrain : Meduim
Effects : Meduim
Geometry : Meduim
Texture : Meduim
Lighting : Meduim
Dynamic Shadows : Meduim
Dynamic Light : Meduim
Anti-Aliasing : Off
Texture Filtering : Meduim

This use to be all on High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes, I use to do a good 80 fps a map and now I do 15-30.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
6

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Fallujha,Gaza,Luskhar Valley (All the New Maps, Except for Fallujha)

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Fallujha- While looking towards the city I drop to a solid 10 fps, while looking in the opposite direction I get 80 fps.
Gaza- Mostly while Inside the city. The out skirts I get a good 30 or so.
Luskar Valley- Just like Fallujha looking towards the center of the map or right when leaving the British Main.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Silent Eagle, Kashan Desert, Battle for Quinling, Muttrah, Dragon Fly (All the old maps and some new ones)

[martov]

System Specifications

* Operating System : windows XP 32 bits
* CPU : athlon 4800 x2
* Graphics Card : ATI xfx hd 4850
* Amount of RAM : 2gb
* Sound Card : omboard, realtek


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1024x768

* Terrain : high
* Effects : high
* Geometry :high
* Texture :high
* Lighting :high
* Dynamic Shadows :high
* Dynamic Light :high
* Anti-Aliasing 4
* Texture Filtering 8



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
only on new maps

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
7

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Gaza (BAD FPS) , Lashkar Valley (not so bad, just when you look to the center of the map)

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Gaza- Mostly while Inside the city
Luskar Valley- looking towards the center of the map.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

[Nimble]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7 Professional 64bit
* CPU : Intel E8400 @ 3.0ghz
* Graphics Card : Nvidia 9800GT
* Amount of RAM : 4GB DDR2
* Sound Card : Onboard Realtek.


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1600x1024

* Terrain : Medium
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : Medium
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : Off
* Texture Filtering : High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
5.92


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Dragon Fly, Fallujah and Beirut, Gaza Beach.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

In Dragon Fly the performance issues are noticable map wide, this is true with Fallujah aswell. The performance issues with Dragon Fly have been made somewhat more bearable with the lowering of Textures and Terrain to medium, aswell as disabling AA. Fallujah continues to deliver very low frame rates, often dropping below 10.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Of those I have played in PR .9, none beyond those listed above seem to give me any issues.

[BRZoio]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows XP home Edition 32 bits
* CPU : Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor E6400 (2M Cache, 2.13 GHz, 1066 MHz FSB)
* Graphics Card : Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT 512Mb
* Amount of RAM : 4Gb 667Mhz
* Sound Card : Onboard Realtek HD Audio 5.1


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1152x864 - 75Hz

* Terrain : Medium
* Effects : Medium
* Geometry : Medium
* Texture : Medium
* Lighting : Medium
* Dynamic Shadows : Medium
* Dynamic Light :Medium
* Anti-Aliasing : 2x
* Texture Filtering : Medium

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes, with the settings above at 0.874 my frame rate was ~50fps ... now with those at 0.9 I usually get ~20-25fps

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

2

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

All of them

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

In the city, near buildings and areas with grass and trees

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

N/A


_______________________________________________________________________

[Zehtuka]

System Specifications
Operating System : Windows 7
CPU : AMD Phenom II x3 720BE
Graphics Card : GTX 275
Amount of RAM : 4GB
Sound Card : x

BF2 Graphics Settings
Resolution : 1920x1080
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : Medium
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 8x
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
yes

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
7

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Yamalia, Fallujah West, Lashkar Valley, Gaza Beach

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Looking at the center of the map kills my FPS by a lot, Using any zoom on Yamalia results in a slideshow.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Beirut, some small FPS drops but overall solid performance.

Maybe it's a new model causing a memory leak?

[Viper[ESF]]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows 7
* CPU : C2D E6600 @ 3,4Ghz
* Graphics Card : Palit GTX260 Clocked
* Amount of RAM : 4Gig 1066
* Sound Card : XFI Xtreme Music


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1920x1080

* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High (bluescreens and crashes since 0.9, so now Medium)
* Lighting : Low
* Dynamic Shadows : Off
* Dynamic Light : Off
* Anti-Aliasing : 8x
* Texture Filtering : 16x



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes. Im getting bluescreens and crashes as well. Never did in PR before.



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
2 (often under 30fps. used to have ~100)


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Only played new maps yet and they had bad performance


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Detailed or 'overloaded' areas. E.g. Forests, City Centers, ...


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
N/A

[Kaurava]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows XP Pro
* CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo e6400
* Graphics Card : Nvidia Geforce 9600 GT (OC)
* Amount of RAM : 2Go DDR2 (Dual Channel)
* Sound Card : Onboard


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :1280x1024

* Terrain : High
* Effects : High
* Geometry : High
* Texture : High
* Lighting : High
* Dynamic Shadows : High
* Dynamic Light : High
* Anti-Aliasing : 8x
* Texture Filtering : High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes. The only map I had problems with before was Ramiel.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

5/10

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Gaza, Beirut, Fallujah, Ramiel (though it was already the case in 0.87) ...

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Whenever looking at the urban areas.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Most non-urban maps.

[hiberNative]

System Specifications

• Operating System : windows xp 32bit
• CPU : AMD X2 4600+ 2,4gz
• Graphics Card : ati hd 3850 512mb
• Amount of RAM : 2gb (4x512) ddr1
• Sound Card : creative x-fi xtrememusic

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1600x1200

• Terrain : medium
• Effects : medium
• Geometry : high
• Texture : high
• Lighting : medium
• Dynamic Shadows : low
• Dynamic Light : medium
• Anti-Aliasing : 4x
• Texture Filtering : low

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
yes, even though i haven't tried all maps yet.


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
5


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
fallujah, gaza, dragon fly


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
when facing the urban area of dragon fly, i get freezing like 3 seconds when turning 180º. the fps is ok but the constant freezing isn't.
@ fallujah i get 15 fps while facing the middle of the map. same thing with gaza (which is strange since gaza is rather small).


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
operation barracuda, karbala, yamalia, seige at ochamachira

[r3dspik3]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows XP
* CPU :Intel Core 2 Duo CPU E6550 @2,33Ghz
* Graphics Card :GeForce 9800 GT
* Amount of RAM :2,0 GB
* Sound Card :O nboard


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution :1280x1024

* Terrain :medium
* Effects :medium
* Geometry :medium
* Texture :medium
* Lighting :medium
* Dynamic Shadows ff
* Dynamic Light ff
* Anti-Aliasing :8x
* Texture Filtering :16x



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
2


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
New Maps and Operation Archer

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Detailed or 'overloaded' areas. E.g. Forests, City Centers, ...


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Operation Barracuda

[Ragni<RangersPL>]

System Specifications

• Operating System : Win XP Professional SP3
• CPU : Pentium D, 2.66 GHz
• Graphics Card : Nvidia GF6600 256 MB
• Amount of RAM : 2 GB
• Sound Card : integrated with motherboard (VIA "something")

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1024x768

• Terrain : Low
• Effects : Low
• Geometry : Low
• Texture : Low
• Lighting : Low
• Dynamic Shadows : Off
• Dynamic Light : Off
• Anti-Aliasing : Off
• Texture Filtering : Off

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?
Yes (but only on new maps, I haven't played old ones yet so I can't tell about them)


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
If 10 is the highest performance in 0.87 and 1 is a slide show in 0.9 then I would say about 6


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Gaza Beach wins the first place in my ranking, Silent Eagle and Beirut (light stutter from time to time), didn't played others yet.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Gaza Beach - City areas and North East part of the map on the shore (near the gas station) are the worst


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Iron Ridge and DragonFly was playable (but with small fps drop), also I've heard from my clanmates that couple of old maps works fine.

[DesmoLocke]

System Specifications

• Operating System : Windows Vista 64-bit
• CPU : Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.2 GHz
• Graphics Card : 2x 8800GT in SLI
• Amount of RAM : 6 GB DDR3 @ 1600 MHz
• Sound Card : Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1920x1200

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : Medium
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : 8x
• Texture Filtering : High
• View Distance : 100%

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes.

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

7

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

Yamalia
Korengal Valley
Iron Ridge

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Especially on Yamalia. When looking across a large field while zoomed in, my fps will drop from 60 fps to 15-20 fps.

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

The rest included in 0.9. I think the performance drops may be due to the intensive use of the new static fields on the 4 km maps. But I'm not complaining. IT just gives me another reason to upgrade my two aging 8800GT's.

[xatu miller]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Windows vista home premium 64bit
* CPU : Intel I7 2.67
* Graphics Card :EVGA GTX 295
* Amount of RAM :6GB DDR3 Corsair dominator
* Sound Card : Supreme X-FI


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1600-1024 75hz refershrate

* Terrain :High
* Effects :High
* Geometry :High
* Texture :High
* Lighting :High
* Dynamic Shadows :High
* Dynamic Light :High
* Anti-Aliasing : 8x
* Texture Filtering :High



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

No. Although stutter seems to happen when driving some vehicles(not all the time but in same places on the map)

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
9



3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
None

4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
All



My PC rig is quite power full so i feel no difference in most cases.

[Celestial1]

System Specifications

• Operating System : Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit SP2
• CPU : Intel Core2 Duo CPU T9600 @ 2.80 GHz
• Graphics Card : NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
• Amount of RAM : 4 GB
• Sound Card : On-board sound, I believe.

BF2 Graphics Settings

• Resolution : 1440x900 60hz

• Terrain : High
• Effects : High
• Geometry : High
• Texture : High
• Lighting : High
• Dynamic Shadows : High
• Dynamic Light : High
• Anti-Aliasing : None
• Texture Filtering : High

1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9? I noticed a severe drop with my previous AA being 2x, but also due to the fact that PR had been stuck on VSync, which had never affected me in 0.87 previously, so I fiddled with the Nvidia panel again, and VSync was disabled somehow or another which kicked my frames back up above 60 and removed VSync's destructive framerate issue (where, if not running at 60, it would drop more severely than without...)



2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.
10. I've removed VSync and went down to 0x AA and am reaching steady 70-80fps in most areas, and rarely dropping below 60 in game areas.


3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.
Dragon Fly, Gaza Beach. Didn't play many other maps before I fixed the 2 issues I had.


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
Gaza looking into the city, Dragon Fly in the city and near forests.


5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.
Silent Eagle, Asad Khal and I would assume all 0.87 maps.

[Zoddom]

System Specifications

* Operating System : Win XP Pro SP 3
* CPU : Athlon 64 3200+
* Graphics Card : Radeon X800XL (256 mb)
* Amount of RAM : 2gb
* Sound Card : none, some onboard stuff


BF2 Graphics Settings

* Resolution : 1280x1024

* Terrain : mid
* Effects : mid
* Geometry : mid
* Texture : high
* Lighting : high
* Dynamic Shadows : low
* Dynamic Light : off
* Anti-Aliasing : 0
* Texture Filtering : high



1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yes, on new maps, i usually got <15 fps. on old, still around 30


2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

3

3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.


Beirut, Gaza, Iron Ridge, Silent Eagle, Muttrah


4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.

Beirut: in the city, Gaza: Everywhere, cause its so small, visual on the city and the NE outskirts, Iron Ridge: almost everywhere, Silent Eagle: everywhere, Muttrah: visual on city

5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Kashan, Quinling, i think all maps with a small amount of entities/statics

/// performance is greatly depending on the amount of players

[CC-Marley]

System Specifications

Operating System : Vista 64 Home
CPU : i7 920 @ 2.85
Graphics Card : ATI 4870x2
Amount of RAM : 6g
Sound Card : Creative SB Hendrix

BF2 Graphics Settings

Resolution : 1920x1080
Terrain : High
Effects : High
Geometry : High
Texture : High
Lighting : High
Dynamic Shadows : High
Dynamic Light : High
Anti-Aliasing : 8x
Texture Filtering : High


1. Have you noticed a significant performance decrease from 0.87 -> 0.9?

Yeah, Usually most maps were 90-100fps. Get drops into the 50's time to time on the same maps

2. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate your performance in 0.9.

Now a 7ish
3. Name three or more maps in 0.9 which result in the worst performance.

The new maps



4. From the maps mentioned above, state which specific areas/directions affect your performance the most.
City centers, dense woods.



5. Name any maps that you have no performance issues with.

Gaza Beach played well