[Map] Geirangerfjord (4km) [WIP]
-
Amok@ndy
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 5144
- Joined: 2008-11-27 22:13
Re: [MAP]Geirangerfjord[4km]
have a look @ mine ^^
in my sig theres the link to Jormdarreh Range (4km) {its really big}
in my sig theres the link to Jormdarreh Range (4km) {its really big}

-
H.sta
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: 2006-12-07 12:40
Re: [MAP]Geirangerfjord[4km]
Don't worry KP, there are two large desert maps beeing made[R-MOD]KP wrote:I still want to see a big Afghan map.![]()
The Karez Offensiveb y Wicca:
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f354-c ... m-wip.html
And Meymaneh by $pyker (no thread for this)
Last edited by H.sta on 2010-03-10 20:48, edited 1 time in total.
-
Zeno
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: 2008-09-07 14:16
Re: [MAP]Geirangerfjord[4km]
lol its 4km? so just the same size...Amok@ndy wrote:{its really big}
[R-DEV]Ninja2dan: Not having a spotter is like masturbating with a cheese grater...mildly amusing at first, but generally painful and bloody in the end.
Thornehaw: If all this have been evidently true, Battlefield is a much scarier and dirtier than ever imagined. Not a conspiracy, but a possibility. If it is true, then trusting another is quite worrisome.
Thornehaw: If all this have been evidently true, Battlefield is a much scarier and dirtier than ever imagined. Not a conspiracy, but a possibility. If it is true, then trusting another is quite worrisome.
-
Amok@ndy
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 5144
- Joined: 2008-11-27 22:13
Re: [MAP]Geirangerfjord[4km]
check my xfire screens
there you see how big it feels 
me watching derGammla driving the pickup down the hill

me watching derGammla driving the pickup down the hill


-
Zeno
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: 2008-09-07 14:16
Re: [MAP]Geirangerfjord[4km]
you should see the size of the tanks compared to the mountains in cold responseAmok@ndy wrote:check my xfire screensthere you see how big it feels
me watching derGammla driving the pickup down the hill![]()
they look so small
[R-DEV]Ninja2dan: Not having a spotter is like masturbating with a cheese grater...mildly amusing at first, but generally painful and bloody in the end.
Thornehaw: If all this have been evidently true, Battlefield is a much scarier and dirtier than ever imagined. Not a conspiracy, but a possibility. If it is true, then trusting another is quite worrisome.
Thornehaw: If all this have been evidently true, Battlefield is a much scarier and dirtier than ever imagined. Not a conspiracy, but a possibility. If it is true, then trusting another is quite worrisome.
-
H.sta
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: 2006-12-07 12:40
-
hx.bjoffe
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: 2007-02-26 15:05
Re: [MAP] Geirangerfjord [4km]
Ontopic.
Is there any military presence in Geirangerfjord?
Does it hold strategic importance?
I don't know much about it. And not that it matters much. But i wonder, have you chosen the location for a reason, other than national romantics?
Is there any military presence in Geirangerfjord?
Does it hold strategic importance?
I don't know much about it. And not that it matters much. But i wonder, have you chosen the location for a reason, other than national romantics?
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: 2008-02-18 21:40
Re: [MAP] Geirangerfjord [4km]
Does it really matter?hx.bjoffe wrote:Ontopic.
Is there any military presence in Geirangerfjord?
Does it hold strategic importance?
I don't know much about it. And not that it matters much. But i wonder, have you chosen the location for a reason, other than national romantics?
Main Alias |TG-6th|Googol
-
Sniper77shot
- Posts: 509
- Joined: 2009-12-24 04:46
Re: [MAP] Geirangerfjord [4km]
I answered 2 of the questions for you.hx.bjoffe wrote:Ontopic.
Is there any military presence in Geirangerfjord? No
Does it hold strategic importance? Yes, a port
I don't know much about it. And not that it matters much. But i wonder, have you chosen the location for a reason, other than national romantics?

-
Zeno
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: 2008-09-07 14:16
Re: [MAP] Geirangerfjord [4km]
the scenario is that russian navy forces are landing forces in western norway to flank around the main battlefront that is currently in middle parts of norway.hx.bjoffe wrote:Ontopic.
Is there any military presence in Geirangerfjord?
Does it hold strategic importance?
I don't know much about it. And not that it matters much. But i wonder, have you chosen the location for a reason, other than national romantics?
the landing are part of a major offensive to brak out of the standoff that has occured.
the plan is for navy units to land and link up with main russian forces inland.
one of the landingzones was geirangerfjord, thats the reason im making the map.
[R-DEV]Ninja2dan: Not having a spotter is like masturbating with a cheese grater...mildly amusing at first, but generally painful and bloody in the end.
Thornehaw: If all this have been evidently true, Battlefield is a much scarier and dirtier than ever imagined. Not a conspiracy, but a possibility. If it is true, then trusting another is quite worrisome.
Thornehaw: If all this have been evidently true, Battlefield is a much scarier and dirtier than ever imagined. Not a conspiracy, but a possibility. If it is true, then trusting another is quite worrisome.
-
robbie3211
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 2009-08-02 12:17
Re: [MAP] Geirangerfjord [4km]
I'm interested, let's see where this goes 
-
Amok@ndy
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 5144
- Joined: 2008-11-27 22:13
Re: [MAP] Geirangerfjord [4km]
you see zeno its not worth it using real names for maps ... the guys just flame ... you remember the highlight thread of Beirut ?Zeno wrote:the scenario is that russian navy forces are landing forces in western norway to flank around the main battlefront that is currently in middle parts of norway.
the landing are part of a major offensive to brak out of the standoff that has occured.
the plan is for navy units to land and link up with main russian forces inland.
one of the landingzones was geirangerfjord, thats the reason im making the map.
i have learned to never use a realname for a map even if you use the realterrain data

-
Zeno
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: 2008-09-07 14:16
Re: [MAP] Geirangerfjord [4km]
hehe i realy dont careAmok@ndy wrote:you see zeno its not worth it using real names for maps ... the guys just flame ... you remember the highlight thread of Beirut ?
i have learned to never use a realname for a map even if you use the realterrain data![]()
i have better things to do than discussing nonsense
[R-DEV]Ninja2dan: Not having a spotter is like masturbating with a cheese grater...mildly amusing at first, but generally painful and bloody in the end.
Thornehaw: If all this have been evidently true, Battlefield is a much scarier and dirtier than ever imagined. Not a conspiracy, but a possibility. If it is true, then trusting another is quite worrisome.
Thornehaw: If all this have been evidently true, Battlefield is a much scarier and dirtier than ever imagined. Not a conspiracy, but a possibility. If it is true, then trusting another is quite worrisome.
