slower gameplay or faster?

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
maarit
Posts: 1145
Joined: 2008-02-04 17:21

slower gameplay or faster?

Post by maarit »

so...
after playing 0.9 what you guys feel about it?
is gameplay enough too slow or too fast to you?

i prefer even more slower gameplay.

my ideal gameplay is just that maybe 10 minutes or more is just quiet but then begans fighting,maybe 10 minutes,,,and the again silence.

so...should pr go even more slower gameplay or faster,or is it fine what is now?
darklord63
Posts: 389
Joined: 2008-12-07 20:18

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by darklord63 »

Personally, I think it's fine, I mean it's not really changing. The thing that really determines your playing experience is you squad's ability to use teamwork, and because of all the new players from .9 who are coming in, I'm only rarely getting good games.
Semper Fudge
In game alias- LEUTShinySides
-Prowler-
Posts: 169
Joined: 2010-03-10 15:06

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by -Prowler- »

I like it now.

I don't think making it faster would be more beneficial...
Image
"Teamwork is essential; it gives the enemy other people to shoot at."
Arnoldio
Posts: 4210
Joined: 2008-07-22 15:04

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by Arnoldio »

Its as fast as you make it :D

But you know the magical combination of W+Shift (or 2xW) drives many people faster, further... deadier?
Image


Orgies beat masturbation hands down. - Staker
GrimSoldier
Posts: 169
Joined: 2009-01-09 21:59

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by GrimSoldier »

Seems slower imo cause of the rally change. Makes it in some ways less exciting but oh well.
In Game Name - Gr1mSoldier
ReadMenace
Posts: 2567
Joined: 2007-01-16 20:05

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by ReadMenace »

Slower the better -- it would be neat if we could have a game where an ambush actually caught someone by surprise. ;)

-REad
boilerrat
Posts: 1482
Joined: 2009-09-02 07:47

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by boilerrat »

I wish gameplay was more like this:



But in all seriousness, it is fine as is.

Nothing is more satisfying than waiting 30 minutes watching your IEDs when a LAV-25 rolls over 10 artillery IEDs spread over a area.

Then later find out you got a tank at the same time.
Image
Phantom2
Posts: 195
Joined: 2009-04-04 01:27

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by Phantom2 »

I like the gameplay as it is. Sometimes it's just fun to go by a choke point and throw an rkg-3 at the unsuspected HMMWV/Stryker to scare it a bit. If the gameplay got any slower with the non-fun rounds, I'd be killing myself.
RHYS4190
Posts: 959
Joined: 2007-08-30 10:27

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by RHYS4190 »

I think PR to unfriendly towards people to have a job, most of the game these days are simply walking through un contested territory, there are no real established front lines, so fighting is usually very dis organised, you spend most of your time waiting for some thing to happen or walking looking for the enemy.

I think Pr should be fast passed and organised yet tactical, front lines should be encouraged, bigg fire fights should be common and very gritty and down out. often resulting in one team having to give grounld and then regroup.

some of you might not have a problem waiting half an hour for a fight that over in a few shots, but most people simply don’t have the time for that.
L4gi
Posts: 2101
Joined: 2008-09-19 21:41

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by L4gi »

The speed of gameplay is fine, although I'd like it a bit faster. Usually the gameplay speed on a server is set by the players. Others have a faster pace, others go slower.
Hunt3r
Posts: 1573
Joined: 2009-04-24 22:09

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by Hunt3r »

There really needs to be more focused fighting if it's for infantry, but for vehicle warfare, it would really make sense to have bigger ones.
Image
Iceberg
Posts: 63
Joined: 2010-04-01 13:23

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by Iceberg »

I think the gameplay is fine as it is
General Dragosh
Posts: 1282
Joined: 2005-12-04 17:35

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by General Dragosh »

Yep, the gameplay is fine as it is =P
[img][/img]Newly ordered sig !


Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by Rudd »

I really like the pace ingame, especially when you get an infantry squad buddied to a vehicle

I like that you can move fast and flank, but also go slow and careful.
Image
gazzthompson
Posts: 8012
Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by gazzthompson »

Rudd posted what i was going to say, so ill just expand.

I think the pace of the mod is pretty much great right now, you can take it slow and be rewarded for it but also with some teamwork with APCs/Helis etc you can skip across the battlefield pretty fast.
Redamare
Posts: 1897
Joined: 2007-10-30 21:09

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by Redamare »

i would say its JUST right ... its not too fast or too slow its right on the money lol it still encourages all ofthe basic pr functions such as teamwork and fair balance
AnimalMother.
Posts: 2476
Joined: 2007-02-25 15:38

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by AnimalMother. »

i've enjoyed the game pace of 0.9 alot more compared to previous versions


echoing gazz and rudd, you can tactically advance anticipating enemy contact, it may not happen but such is war and it builds up the tension for when you make contact. Alternatively you can request transport and blitz your way to death or glory.

my favourite battlefield role of transport pilot has it's own mix of slow and fast pace. can be sat idling for a while then when we cap a flag alot of squads need moving.

With certain people on the server you can will get a good balance of slow and fast paced gameplay.

hell it could be 0.8 where a firefight took ages as you either sprayed bullets wildly or waited half a century to get an accurate shot off
ex |TG-31st|
AnimalMotherUK - YouTube

vistamaster01: "I just dont get people with girl usernames/pics/sigs lol,
for example I thought AnimalMother was a girl :o ops:"

Arte et Marte
the_ganman
Posts: 151
Joined: 2009-07-27 21:00

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by the_ganman »

boilerrat wrote:I wish gameplay was more like this:



But in all seriousness, it is fine as is.

Nothing is more satisfying than waiting 30 minutes watching your IEDs when a LAV-25 rolls over 10 artillery IEDs spread over a area.

Then later find out you got a tank at the same time.


HAHAHA he said the maps are so big :P :? : :? : :? : :? : :? :
Iceberg
Posts: 63
Joined: 2010-04-01 13:23

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by Iceberg »

There should be more infantry based levels imo
stealth420
Posts: 256
Joined: 2009-09-29 19:59

Re: slower gameplay or faster?

Post by stealth420 »

Make all vehicle times, Including Air vehicles , 5 minutes and you got faster gameplay.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”