Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
-
Hotrod525
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: 2006-12-10 13:28
Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
As said in title, i wonder if it could be possible to have the green beast on INS map with the CF ? Adding some Firepower to the CF 

-
Hunt3r
- Posts: 1573
- Joined: 2009-04-24 22:09
-
Hotrod525
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: 2006-12-10 13:28
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
Yeah for now, but i'm pretty sure there will be more map for C.F. =)Hunt3r wrote:...Op. Archer?

-
Spartan0189
- Posts: 1277
- Joined: 2008-07-11 21:22
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
Considering how it is a bit difficult to move around on Archer, why add a tank? I think the LAV-3 does a well enough of a job, Just my opinion

-
Hresvelgr
- Posts: 248
- Joined: 2008-04-30 15:16
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
Yeah, Leopard would be overkill. It's not even the type of map where bringing a tank would be plausible, not even even ground and open space like there is on Al Basrah and Fallujah. Besides, leave the insurgents a few maps at least where they don't get tank raped. 
"I'm not crazy, I'm the only one who's not crazy!"
-
Charliesierra-RCR
- Posts: 143
- Joined: 2009-11-21 20:57
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
Does Yamalia get it on AAS? i've only played a couple of times, and havent seen it
-
Rudd
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 21225
- Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
the Leo 2 is currently only featured on yamalia Vehicle warfare, but that is a kickass modeCharliesierra-RCR wrote:Does Yamalia get it on AAS? i've only played a couple of times, and havent seen it
-
Excavus
- Posts: 539
- Joined: 2009-04-10 19:21
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
Public servers don't play vehicle warfare.
-
Drunkenup
- Posts: 786
- Joined: 2009-03-16 20:53
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
Yes they do.... you just gotta look.....Excavus wrote:Public servers don't play vehicle warfare.
-
Hunt3r
- Posts: 1573
- Joined: 2009-04-24 22:09
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
The LAV-3 really needs revision, it's far too tippy, just hitting a bump on a road can tip you over.

-
Hotrod525
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: 2006-12-10 13:28
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
well we use it in A-Stan.. =\ and L2A6M-C is like under-used, only 1 map, in only 1 mod...

-
dtacs
- Posts: 5512
- Joined: 2008-12-07 23:30
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
The USAF use the AC130 gunship in the war on terror (well at least according to tons of vids on youtube) so by that logic it should also be in game.Hotrod525 wrote:well we use it in A-Stan.. =\ and L2A6M-C is like under-used, only 1 map, in only 1 mod...
Any tank on Archer is simply too big for the map, and most of the map is mountainous, the tank would only be able to follow the roads which would mean a quick death.
The LAVs are currently suffering from the same problem, the best thing they can usually do is go up the hill near the castle and shoot down into the town.
-
Dev1200
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: 2008-11-30 23:01
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
The gunship squadrons are part of the Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC), a component of United States Special Operations Command (SOCOM).dtacs wrote:The USAF use the AC130 gunship in the war on terror (well at least according to tons of vids on youtube) so by that logic it should also be in game.
Spec ops uses them. Not Regular Forces. PR is Regular Forces oriented.
Also, adding the Leopard to any map makes it unbalanced. 5 T90's vs 1 Leopard? Leopard wins. : D
But seriously, I would love to see it added to an AAS map.

-
Hunt3r
- Posts: 1573
- Joined: 2009-04-24 22:09
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
At least the Leopards don't flip...dtacs wrote:The USAF use the AC130 gunship in the war on terror (well at least according to tons of vids on youtube) so by that logic it should also be in game.
Any tank on Archer is simply too big for the map, and most of the map is mountainous, the tank would only be able to follow the roads which would mean a quick death.
The LAVs are currently suffering from the same problem, the best thing they can usually do is go up the hill near the castle and shoot down into the town.

-
Hotrod525
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: 2006-12-10 13:28
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
Dev1200 wrote:The gunship squadrons are part of the Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC), a component of United States Special Operations Command (SOCOM).
Spec ops uses them. Not Regular Forces. PR is Regular Forces oriented.
Also, adding the Leopard to any map makes it unbalanced. 5 T90's vs 1 Leopard? Leopard wins. : D
But seriously, I would love to see it added to an AAS map.
Well 5 T90 against 1 Leopard 2A6M... would be more 3 T90 destroyed and the Leopard shreded.

-
Drunkenup
- Posts: 786
- Joined: 2009-03-16 20:53
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
Its not like they're not used to support regular forces, in the Battle of Khafji, a AC-130 supported the 1st Marine division through the night, until it was shot down. In all it destroyed more than 10 Iraqi armored vehicles. I could see it in the future.... but in very large maps, and in very little numbers.Dev1200 wrote:The gunship squadrons are part of the Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC), a component of United States Special Operations Command (SOCOM).
Spec ops uses them. Not Regular Forces. PR is Regular Forces oriented.
Also, adding the Leopard to any map makes it unbalanced. 5 T90's vs 1 Leopard? Leopard wins. : D
But seriously, I would love to see it added to an AAS map.
-
Tannhauser
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: 2007-11-22 03:06
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
I'd say T-72's.Hotrod525 wrote:Well 5 T90 against 1 Leopard 2A6M... would be more 3 T90 destroyed and the Leopard shreded.
T-90 / T-80U aren't origamis stacked alluminium foils from what I recall
«Hollywood jackasses who insist on spending seriously huge amounts of money to make films that even my cat won't watch. And he'll happily sit in the bathroom and watch me shit.»
- [R-DEV]Masaq
- [R-DEV]Masaq
-
Hotrod525
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: 2006-12-10 13:28
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
anyway we are going off topic, i still think we should have L2A6M-C on CF INS Map.Tannhauser wrote:I'd say T-72's.
T-90 / T-80U aren't origamis stacked alluminium foils from what I recall![]()

-
Charliesierra-RCR
- Posts: 143
- Joined: 2009-11-21 20:57
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
If no Leo2, how about a CV90?
-
dtacs
- Posts: 5512
- Joined: 2008-12-07 23:30
Re: Leopard 2A6M-C on INS map for CF.
Isn't the Canadian army currently testing them? Wikipedia says they only have one in use and its not confirmed.Charliesierra-RCR wrote:If no Leo2, how about a CV90?

