How about a Nuke??

[Infantry1242]

Maybe,if the Russians get enough kills in total they can launch a nuke all kill everyone?

Warned for stupid suggestion with no basis in reality or gameplay.

[Freelance_Commando]

Well considering there are a tonne of treaties condoning the use of nuclear arms, the limits of the BF2 engine AND the normal progression of PR gameplay, then no.

Just think of it this way:
If the russians had killed enough people, why kill all their soldiers and lose everything they have been fighting over for the entire game? Why not just do it at the start of the round and save themselves the time?

However if this were the rebels, and they had a nuclear weapon, and they were getting slaughtered...
Wait, no, that still doesn't make much sense either...

[Infantry1242]

Well considering there are a tonne of treaties condoning the use of nuclear arms, the limits of the BF2 engine AND the normal progression of PR gameplay, then no.

Just think of it this way:
If the russians had killed enough people, why kill all their soldiers and lose everything they have been fighting over for the entire game? Why not just do it at the start of the round and save themselves the time?

However if this were the rebels, and they had a nuclear weapon, and they were getting slaughtered...
Wait, no, that still doesn't make much sense either...

Russia could easily break that treaty,assuming this takes place 2012-2020 area,the treaty could have been weakened by China's nuclear base in Operation Barracuda,that means not ALL of the nukes that have been cut were dismembered,remember in the PR universe Russia is clubbing Canada,USA,and Israel and everyone else has been crushed or kept their mouths shut (so far).So you say that story wise,it's okay to let China and/or Russia to have nukes.

[Infantry1242]

This would add teamwork.

+1

Exactly

[dtacs]

This would add teamwork.

+1

Yep, but to be honest the team would have to have a certain amount of kills, harrier strikes and apache gunners not included.

[Freelance_Commando]

Russia could easily break that treaty,assuming this takes place 2012-2020 area,the treaty could have been weakened by China's nuclear base in Operation Barracuda,that means not ALL of the nukes that have been cut were dismembered,remember in the PR universe Russia is clubbing Canada,USA,and Israel and everyone else has been crushed or kept their mouths shut (so far).So you say that story wise,it's okay to let China and/or Russia to have nukes.

Well if that's a question, it doesn't matter if it's 'ok' for China and Russia to have nukes because that has no point in your initial suggestion. Simply using a nuclear weapon just because you 'killed so many people' is a stupid idea since you're fighting over territory, not just for the urge to blow everything up.

To be more precise, the 'nuclear base' in Opperation Barracuda is more of a missle silo/ bunker attached to a military base and airstrip, which goes for the Russians as well.
Just because there are treaties, doesn't mean there aren't still caches of nuclear arms which are still able to be used, but doing so on an active battlefield is still a stupid idea.

By the way, how are the commanders supposed to know how many 'kills' their side has?

[Eddiereyes909]

Locked. This is not MW2.