LAV3 RWS for CF "light APC class"

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
anglomanii
Posts: 701
Joined: 2008-12-20 10:38

Re: LAV3 RWS for CF "light APC class"

Post by anglomanii »

whats the differences between the Canadian LAV3 RWS (light APC?) and the Australian ASLAV-PC, if i understand correctly isn't tonnie still working on the PC variant and it already has the RWS. and i thought the aussies got their lavs from the same place as the Canadians. we are even combining our work on the m113 upgrades as well.



<22:31:15> "Supahpingi": i was actually mastrubating ferosiosly to mike meyers pictures
Hotrod525
Posts: 2215
Joined: 2006-12-10 13:28

Re: LAV3 RWS for CF "light APC class"

Post by Hotrod525 »

anglomanii wrote:whats the differences between the Canadian LAV3 RWS (light APC?) and the Australian ASLAV-PC, if i understand correctly isn't tonnie still working on the PC variant and it already has the RWS. and i thought the aussies got their lavs from the same place as the Canadians. we are even combining our work on the m113 upgrades as well.
ASLAV-PC is a LAV25, and the LAVIII RWS is much more similar to STRYKER, wich is entirely different from LAV25 :P
Image
dtacs
Posts: 5512
Joined: 2008-12-07 23:30

Re: LAV3 RWS for CF "light APC class"

Post by dtacs »

anglomanii wrote:whats the differences between the Canadian LAV3 RWS (light APC?) and the Australian ASLAV-PC, if i understand correctly isn't tonnie still working on the PC variant and it already has the RWS. and i thought the aussies got their lavs from the same place as the Canadians. we are even combining our work on the m113 upgrades as well.
Different hulls, both based off the Swiss one though.

Image

The ASLAV PC has a significantly smaller front with the drivers hole being lower down, the PC also has an increased cargo space with a raised rear and can carry more troops, don't think the PC model could be used for the RWS.

Image
Kim Jong ill
Posts: 166
Joined: 2009-06-07 09:36

Re: LAV3 RWS for CF "light APC class"

Post by Kim Jong ill »

Hitman.2.5 wrote:Will the M113A3 be as bad as the IDF's one? blows up with one RPG to the side where it looks like it has 6 inches of steel :p
M113s aren't even made of steel and the armour is at most 1.5 inches and as little as .47 inches thick.
Charliesierra-RCR
Posts: 143
Joined: 2009-11-21 20:57

Re: LAV3 RWS for CF "light APC class"

Post by Charliesierra-RCR »

Hotrod is 100% correct in everything he's saying, believe me, im seeing it... the TLAVs have the slat armor cages, longer hulls... the LAV3's RWS are being used... so dont argue with Hotrod, he's 100% correct
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”