A realistic mine..
I mean, am I the only one that doesn't find the current mine and system for it VERY unrealistic.
You:
''I'm gonna trow a mine down this road where everyone can easily see it''
*Takes a mine from his back*
*Arms the mine and trows it on the ground*
*Mine slides down a bit and finally stops moving*
----------------------------------------------------------
Enemy:
*Drives around in a techie*
*Sees a huge mine on the road that just looks like someone exedently dropped it*
Everyone starts screaming: ''MINE!''
You say: ''Ofcourse I see that''
*turns around and drives around the mine*
----------------------------------------------------------
Only people you kill with those mines are retards...
Conventional Army Mine Increase
-
MikeDude
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 2007-10-25 12:07
-
ytman
- Posts: 634
- Joined: 2010-04-22 17:32
Re: Conventional Army Mine Increase
Yes, placing only one mine is stupid. We are talking about mine fields here.mikeyboyz wrote:A realistic mine..
I mean, am I the only one that doesn't find the current mine and system for it VERY unrealistic.
You:
''I'm gonna trow a mine down this road where everyone can easily see it''
*Takes a mine from his back*
*Arms the mine and trows it on the ground*
*Mine slides down a bit and finally stops moving*
----------------------------------------------------------
Enemy:
*Drives around in a techie*
*Sees a huge mine on the road that just looks like someone exedently dropped it*
Everyone starts screaming: ''MINE!''
You say: ''Ofcourse I see that''
*turns around and drives around the mine*
----------------------------------------------------------
Only people you kill with those mines are retards...
Also everyone else agrees that the current method is unrealistic, and their might be changes coming sometime. But the reason I suggested this idea is due to its utter simplicity and ease of implementation.


