reduction in scopes

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Nebsif
Posts: 1512
Joined: 2009-08-22 07:57

Re: reduction in scopes

Post by Nebsif »

PKM is already inaccurate ingame, but it makes u go black and white in 1 shot, and military advisors are saying that 5.56 LMGs are darn accurate IRL.
YouTube - ‫נגב קומנדו‬‎ - Negev LMG luls (couldnt embed)
Last edited by Nebsif on 2010-08-31 14:00, edited 1 time in total.
Cossack
Posts: 1689
Joined: 2009-06-17 09:25

Re: reduction in scopes

Post by Cossack »

The scoped weapons for rifleman class don't have any big advantage over iron sighted weapons. Only thing is you can see a little bit further, thats all. Yesterday I was playing Asad Khal and as HAMAS we owned the IDF in the battle with our iron sighted weapons. It doesn't matter if you have scope or not. Everything is up to your skill level. You can shoot from iron sighted M16 as good as you can with scoped M16.
Image
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: reduction in scopes

Post by samogon100500 »

Cossack112 wrote:The scoped weapons for rifleman class don't have any big advantage over iron sighted weapons. Only thing is you can see a little bit further, thats all. Yesterday I was playing Asad Khal and as HAMAS we owned the IDF in the battle with our iron sighted weapons. It doesn't matter if you have scope or not. Everything is up to your skill level. You can shoot from iron sighted M16 as good as you can with scoped M16.
Yes,you right,but this map is only CQB,and for IDF very bad idea take scoped weapon :D
On maps like Jabal,muttrah or fallugah where very long street and possible ownage by scoped rifles and MGs!
Nebsif wrote:PKM is already inaccurate ingame, but it makes u go black and white in 1 shot, and military advisors are saying that 5.56 LMGs are darn accurate IRL.
YouTube - ‫נגב קומנדו‬‎ - Negev LMG luls (couldnt embed)
Yes they more accurate that GMPGs,but not on high distance(More 400m)!And yes - am about bullets ballistic!

I wanna see positional warfare gameplay where we have frontline!IMO - Optics and MG with optics make more lone wolfs!If replace optical sights guys without sights must follow for guys with optics and cover them!reduction of scopes can be make medic on every squad,how this is not(Choose of majority - optics)!MG gunner makes automatically sniper rifle to fire machine to make suppress fire against enemies(Of course it's not easy that lie down on highest on map mountain and shoot on every movement)
P.s am not forget about scoped MG,they can be requested on crate it's good weapon for defense but not for attack!
So realism>teamplay or teamplay>realism - your choose!
Image
ComradeHX
Posts: 3294
Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58

Re: reduction in scopes

Post by ComradeHX »

[R-DEV]Rudd wrote:we should all bow to the expertise of our Russian MA Nosforatu

when it comes to China we are a little lacking in information.
I was just in China(the capital, for family and buying anime stuff) a month back.

Other than the guards at where I live, they all seem to have atleast handled the daylight optics (current PR scope for QBZ-95).

If any chinese gun should NOT have a scope, it would be the QBU-88... the scope mounts unsecurely to the rail and causes loss of zero in a few shots and other problems...

The bipods on QBU-88 snaps easily (aluminum...with huge lightening cuts...).
Cassius
Posts: 3958
Joined: 2008-04-14 17:37

Re: reduction in scopes

Post by Cassius »

Well I think the problem is more with players aboslutely having to get a kill on their first mag. At 200m a rifle is an accurate weapon. You should take cover. Id like to see people worry more about staying alive than getting kills.
|TG|cap_Kilgore
Image
Garmax
Posts: 288
Joined: 2008-06-13 00:52

Re: reduction in scopes

Post by Garmax »

i think this issue is going to be fixed with the new 3d scopes anyways
Bringerof_D
Posts: 2142
Joined: 2007-11-16 04:43

Re: reduction in scopes

Post by Bringerof_D »

cyberzomby wrote: And the Cover idea. I dont know man. Isnt there plenty of cover in maps to use for 6 vs 6 combats? Isnt it just the players who travel over open ground grouped up with no one covering them?
yes that is true but what i mean is, in a lot of areas where there should be plenty of visual cover, due to engine limitations, there isnt enough. I'm not talking about crossing a flat open plain, i'm talking about crawling in a thick and uneven mud pit. Or how in afghanistan entire plains can be full of grooves from weathering just deep enough for a guy to crawl through. in some places an insurgent can crawl within 50 meters of a VCP without anyone noticing them. with the current limitations camo and concealment techniques are almost completely useless unless you have a significantly sized object protruding from the ground which IRL you dont need.

in the example of the mud, instead of having an actual uneven surface, all we have is a texture that makes it look uneven. when theres someone on it, even if they are textured to mix in with it, ends up just lying on the flat surface and sticking out like a sore thumb
Information in the hands of a critical thinker is invaluable, information alone is simply dangerous.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”