BetterDeadThanRed wrote:
1) Hex core processors: Are they worth it? Do they help when playing games?
yes. a) you can do more things at the same time better (as in running multiple applications). They also help a single application if it is written to use more than one core. should be standard soon. They help with games when this prerequisite is met (coded for use of multiple cores).
BetterDeadThanRed wrote:
2) SSD drives - Are all the cool kids booting their OS from them now? Does it really make a difference? Is it worth the price?
You have to decide urself if it's worth the price but they make a hell of a difference regarding overall system performance. anything that involves reading from a HDD will be significantly faster especially when many smaller and or fragmented files are used. Especially during things like startup, starting applications or loading in games. Also: No defragging anymore

. For Arma 2 for example a SSD makes a significant difference since the game constantly reads from the HDD.
BetterDeadThanRed wrote:
3) Sound cards - Is the quality that noticeable over on board? What about when using high quality headphones? Does it take a load off of the CPU?
1) yes
2) good soundcard and crappy headphones give crappy sound. crappy soundcard and good headphones give crappy sound also.
nowadays onboard chips aren't all that bad in my opinion.
3) depends on the game
BetterDeadThanRed wrote:
4) Memory - more MHz is good I'm assuming, but is it that much of a difference to warrant less GB for more MHz? (cost wise) Do extra GBs stop mattering after a certain point?
1) Faster is always better
2) More is not always better, if you already have >= 4GB or so go for the quicker RAM.
3) More or less. Depends on what you do. For gaming you should be set with 8GB under almost all circumstances.
BetterDeadThanRed wrote:
5) Price - Is a $800 processor really worth the price difference of a $250 processor?
Usually not
BetterDeadThanRed wrote:
6) Price 2.0 - If I invest 2k into a computer, will it be twice as kickass as putting 1k into a computer, or will the difference be almost negligible? (Going by my economics knowledge, I'm assuming there is a place where putting more money into a computer won't give you a great return on investment, but at what point do things stop being practical?)
It will not be twice as kickass. the "production function" is not linear in price but with decreasing returns to scale. A PC that costs 2k will be less than twice as kickass probably.
BetterDeadThanRed wrote:
7) Operating systems - What the hell is the difference between Windows 7 home/ultimate/pro/galactic-overlord edition? Does it matter and is it worth the price?
I really dunno. I'd go for professional if it's anything like XP
BetterDeadThanRed wrote:

Bluray? Is there any conceivable use for these things in the near future?
there are already uses. I personally wouldn't buy a BluRay writer (I think that's where ur heading with this question) yet.