MT-LBs
-
J.F.Leusch69
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 2988
- Joined: 2008-04-23 16:37
Re: MT-LBs
Last edited by J.F.Leusch69 on 2010-10-17 22:36, edited 1 time in total.
-
scharf
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 2009-04-07 07:52
Re: MT-LBs
well the AA one says Crew 3 so technically you could have 1 passenger
-
HeXeY
- Posts: 1160
- Joined: 2008-06-28 18:03
Re: MT-LBs
And most tanks have a crew of 4 in real life, but the commander have been removed/combined with the driver, as is the case with APCs and other armoured vehicles in PRscharf wrote:well the AA one says Crew 3 so technically you could have 1 passenger

-
Reco Monkey
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 2010-11-05 12:03
Re: MT-LBs
9P149 (ATGM) - Crew of 2 - Commander/Gunner + Driver
SA-13 Gopher (AA) - Crew of 3 - Commander + Gunner + Driver
SA-13 Gopher (AA) - Crew of 3 - Commander + Gunner + Driver
-
Jaymz
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 9138
- Joined: 2006-04-29 10:03
Re: MT-LBs
Except pretty much every modern Russian or Chinese MBT out there which have 3.HeXeY wrote:And most tanks have a crew of 4 in real life
"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
-
samogon100500
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58
Re: MT-LBs
Inside - 2 and 3 crew members.Reco Monkey wrote:9P149 (ATGM) - Crew of 2 - Commander/Gunner + Driver
SA-13 Gopher (AA) - Crew of 3 - Commander + Gunner + Driver
But infantry can be ride outside.But i don't think it so good idea - if they shoot,infantry on the top gonna die.
Last edited by samogon100500 on 2010-11-10 12:14, edited 1 time in total.

-
Chuc
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 7016
- Joined: 2007-02-11 03:14
-
samogon100500
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58
Re: MT-LBs
No i don't think so,bad idea seat on this vehicle,when they firin'[R-DEV]Chuc wrote:That'd be interesting..
RusArmy ride on BTRs,BMPs(In WW2 on Tanks =) ),but i don't think so good idea ride on AA/AT vehicle.

-
Reco Monkey
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 2010-11-05 12:03
Re: MT-LBs
I see what you did there[R-DEV]Chuc wrote:That'd be interesting..


