Reason for Weapons Caches

FiveOh617 · Post by **FiveOh617** » 2010-12-11 16:54

If insurgents spawn with weapons, why do they need caches?

NyteMyre · Post by **NyteMyre** » 2010-12-11 16:58

cache
/k?ʃ/ [kash] noun, verb, cached, cach?ing.

–noun
1.
a hiding place, esp. one in the ground, for ammunition, food, treasures, etc.: She hid her jewelry in a little cache in the cellar.
2.
anything so hidden: The enemy never found our cache of food.
3.
Alaska and Northern Canada . a small shed elevated on poles above the reach of animals and used for storing food, equipment, etc.
–verb (used with object)
4.
to put in a cache; conceal; hide.

And as gameplay object

FiveOh617 · Post by **FiveOh617** » 2010-12-11 16:59

Your sense of humor is astounding.

mockingbird0901 · Post by **mockingbird0901** » 2010-12-11 16:59

Have you played ins?
They can reload from them, plus there are pick-up kits there

FiveOh617 · Post by **FiveOh617** » 2010-12-11 17:09

It was a joke.

Bellator · Post by **Bellator** » 2010-12-11 17:13

The caches represent places where the insurgents store and hide their weapons from the occupying armed forces. Sure, in game, the insurgents could spawn with weapons even if the caches were removed. But the point is that the weapons which the insurgents spawn with originate from one of these caches, because the insurgents have few sources of armaments and supplies outside their region. If the weapons are destroyed, the insurgents lose their tools of resisting the enemy, and that's why the blufor tries to destroy them.

Johncro · Post by **Johncro** » 2010-12-11 17:18

FiveOh617 wrote:It was a joke.

Sarcasm fails over the internet.

FiveOh617 · Post by **FiveOh617** » 2010-12-11 17:39

I think maybe its the language barrier.

karambaitos · Post by **karambaitos** » 2010-12-11 17:41

FiveOh617 wrote:I think maybe its the language barrier.

no sarcasm and writing DONT GO TOGETHER unless its really obvious.

and its not like the PR forum hasn't seen a fair share of questions like these

Wakain · Post by **Wakain** » 2010-12-11 17:46

karambaitos wrote:no sarcasm and writing DONT GO TOGETHER unless its really obvious.

and its not like the PR forum hasn't seen a fair share of questions like these

lol, too right

but let me get this straight, fiveoh, you've started a thread so you could make a joke?

FiveOh617 · Post by **FiveOh617** » 2010-12-11 18:00

Ugh. Europeans.

Post by **Spec** » 2010-12-11 18:01

The fact it is an own thread made sarcasm unlikely, since that would be taking the risk of a swift lock and possibly infraction.

A thread for a one-liner is just kinda... rare

gazzthompson · Post by **gazzthompson** » 2010-12-11 18:04

FiveOh617 wrote:Ugh. Europeans.

Ugh. Americans

goguapsy · Post by **goguapsy** » 2010-12-11 18:16

FiveOh617 wrote:It was a joke.

I got banned because of a joke.

It involved fast-ropes, so the end was pretty obvious.

Post by **Dunehunter** » 2010-12-11 18:26

Ugh, locked.

FiveOh617, joke threads go in off-topic. Next time, try to make it funny.

Reason for Weapons Caches

Reason for Weapons Caches

re: Reason for Weapons Caches

re: Reason for Weapons Caches

re: Reason for Weapons Caches

Re: Reason for Weapons Caches

Re: Reason for Weapons Caches

Re: Reason for Weapons Caches

Re: Reason for Weapons Caches

Re: Reason for Weapons Caches

Re: Reason for Weapons Caches

Re: Reason for Weapons Caches

Re: Reason for Weapons Caches

Re: Reason for Weapons Caches

Re: Reason for Weapons Caches

Re: Reason for Weapons Caches