The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Wh33lman
Posts: 667
Joined: 2008-07-16 23:30

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by Wh33lman »

i think we need to seperate the "historical" maps in PR(Fallujah, Al Basrah, Karballa, Ramiel) from the fictional maps(Muttrah, Beruit, Gaza)

now in terms of factions on different maps, Wanda Shan is an oddball. previously my view of PR was like BF2142, EU vs PAC, West vs East. i always thought that Russia and China were of a Russia-China-MEC alliance. Beruit is also kinda of an oddity too. the only thing i had to go off of was 2 words for CoD4, "Remember Beruit" Captain Price's warning to whats-his-face. it occurs to me now that Russia is actually labeled as BLUFOR on Beruit.

now for this French v IDF map, that makes no sense. Israel is in good with the US, and the US is part of NATO. so why is NATO fighting the Israelis?

with the GB vs Milita maps, i thought GB was only a placeholder for the Russians.

im not trying to blow holes in your carefully developed fiction. its clear you spent alot of time with this and im not trying to say "your wrong". just my view on the "PR War".
Nax
Posts: 31
Joined: 2009-12-23 03:05

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by Nax »

Wh33lman wrote:i think we need to seperate the "historical" maps in PR(Fallujah, Al Basrah, Karballa, Ramiel) from the fictional maps(Muttrah, Beruit, Gaza)

now in terms of factions on different maps, Wanda Shan is an oddball. previously my view of PR was like BF2142, EU vs PAC, West vs East. i always thought that Russia and China were of a Russia-China-MEC alliance. Beruit is also kinda of an oddity too. the only thing i had to go off of was 2 words for CoD4, "Remember Beruit" Captain Price's warning to whats-his-face. it occurs to me now that Russia is actually labeled as BLUFOR on Beruit.

now for this French v IDF map, that makes no sense. Israel is in good with the US, and the US is part of NATO. so why is NATO fighting the Israelis?

with the GB vs Milita maps, i thought GB was only a placeholder for the Russians.

im not trying to blow holes in your carefully developed fiction. its clear you spent alot of time with this and im not trying to say "your wrong". just my view on the "PR War".
Well in my "timeline", I was planning on setting up the stage for Israel's political isolation. In this case, the MEC would form on the basis of restoring the Middle East to antebellum conditions, with other factors like the resource crisis and increased western influence also factoring into its creation. I thusly figured it inevitable that, following the IDF's capture of Lebanon and Gaza, a Coalition of neighboring nations would invade. NATO forces would quickly have to chose sides, and though the US has strong ties with Israel in the real world, in my alternate universe IDF hasn't been making many friends, especially after the violence in the region. I figured that, due to economic encouragement from OPEC and political encouragement from the major "players" in the Middle East (Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc), NATO forces may inevitably break ties with the uncontrollable Israel. Perhaps the UN condemned Israel's actions, with a UN containment force being sent to "oversee" the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Syria and Lebanon. Nevertheless, although our situation is stable in the real world, the world of Project Reality seems to be a series of worst-case scenarios for any of it to be remotely plausible.
Doc.Pock
Posts: 2899
Joined: 2010-08-23 14:53

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by Doc.Pock »

muttrah aint no sci-fi [you can quote this :) ]
General Dragosh
Posts: 1282
Joined: 2005-12-04 17:35

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by General Dragosh »

Im here to say and request that you take Croatia out of BLUFOR and place it as neutral, and make serbia possibly green, for obvious reasons =D

Any explanation anyone wants i am willing to give =P

And make a Legend on the World Map as well
[img][/img]Newly ordered sig !


SavageLycan
Posts: 14
Joined: 2009-01-23 19:30

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by SavageLycan »

Wh33lman wrote:i think we need to seperate the "historical" maps in PR(Fallujah, Al Basrah, Karballa, Ramiel) from the fictional maps(Muttrah, Beruit, Gaza)

now in terms of factions on different maps, Wanda Shan is an oddball. previously my view of PR was like BF2142, EU vs PAC, West vs East. i always thought that Russia and China were of a Russia-China-MEC alliance. Beruit is also kinda of an oddity too. the only thing i had to go off of was 2 words for CoD4, "Remember Beruit" Captain Price's warning to whats-his-face. it occurs to me now that Russia is actually labeled as BLUFOR on Beruit.

now for this French v IDF map, that makes no sense. Israel is in good with the US, and the US is part of NATO. so why is NATO fighting the Israelis?

with the GB vs Milita maps, i thought GB was only a placeholder for the Russians.

im not trying to blow holes in your carefully developed fiction. its clear you spent alot of time with this and im not trying to say "your wrong". just my view on the "PR War".
Nah man, I get what you're saying 100%. I actually really like the Beirut map, which sorta made sense in the Russia-MEC alliance. But the France vs. Israel map really throws a wrench in things. Not trying to belittle the work of people in any fashion, but, really? C'mon. Didn't it start out as being France vs. MEC anyway?
FelipeFR
Posts: 146
Joined: 2009-08-13 01:11

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by FelipeFR »

Haha, now I'm imagining an EndWar-like system being used in PR2. :D
Wh33lman
Posts: 667
Joined: 2008-07-16 23:30

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by Wh33lman »

i finally remembered to dig up this link while im on my desktop:

Project Reality v0.856 Maps - Google Maps

dont know if it helps or hurts your story.
BroCop
Posts: 4155
Joined: 2008-03-08 12:28

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by BroCop »

Oh why wont people just accept the fact that there is no story and that each battle is 100% fictious (well most of them)
Image
Doc.Pock
Posts: 2899
Joined: 2010-08-23 14:53

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by Doc.Pock »

cuz we need some excitement and there is nothin more excited than developing your ownstory in your nibd
lukeyu2005
Posts: 226
Joined: 2010-11-01 02:48

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by lukeyu2005 »

An idea for the backstory for wanda shan
In operation flashpoint dragon rising china mobilizes it's troops in Manchuria and russia responds.

YouTube - Operation Flashpoint Dragon Rising - Official Intro Cinematic

Maybe in wanda shan one of the so many border disputes got really big and russia invades and china fights back.
Either that or the U.S. operation on Skira fails and Russia thinks the only way to get Skira back is though a show of force and force the Chinese to the negotiating table (a bit like in the Yom Kippur war)
And Wanda Shan was that show of force
Ser Jergen
Posts: 68
Joined: 2009-02-21 05:10

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by Ser Jergen »

I definitely see this as helping out the PR team when they go for the fully fledged game and developing their own story
John-117
Posts: 1253
Joined: 2009-04-15 18:45

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by John-117 »

After seeing that I wanna see one in Britian or Antartica
Proud Member of [COLOR="Blue"][PR-HK][/COLOR]

thanks rampo93
LongHairedHuman
Posts: 110
Joined: 2010-11-23 16:03

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by LongHairedHuman »

I find this very intersting, and I think that can be used with some sort of new section in he game menu, a sort of "status" menu. In that menu you would see this map, and an explaination about the current status of fthe world, in PR.

That would add some depth in the game, as you would know that there goes on more in the world you fight, then just that battle. Possebly add dates to it, and an legend.

cheers,
- Human
Image
General Dragosh
Posts: 1282
Joined: 2005-12-04 17:35

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by General Dragosh »

Well i for some need a map,

well having a "story/backstory" is a must, its what makes a game better, not that the story just sets a linear path of the direction of the game itself but it just explains some things, to those of us with a curious mind and interests in stories,

So i do think that a World map of the military status is a good thing, well and everyone who doesent like it can just ignore it =P
[img][/img]Newly ordered sig !


Bob of Mage
Posts: 227
Joined: 2010-09-29 09:39

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by Bob of Mage »

Here's a neat idea, what if there is more than one conflict? Also not every war is just about killing all of the other side, sometimes small things like northern oil right could be fought over (big reason for Canada vs. Russia).

Like say the MEC is founded after (or before doesn't matter) the China-NATO war. Russia might have had a clash or two with China (great time to take a small bit of land) but never entered the fight for any side. The MEC for some reason starts fighting the UK, USA and the IDF (so far it isn't known if NATO is 100% in the fight). Russia might have a beef with some NATO members (northern oil and maybe something with the EU) and join forces with a friendly MEC so they can both get what they want. Remenber that the PR battles are most likely small wars or else nukes might be used.

Note: Russia was not on China's side in BF2, the EU attacked from Russia (read the mission text).
x-spades-x
Posts: 267
Joined: 2009-07-24 00:44

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by x-spades-x »

next will be an Axis & Allies: Project Reality Game.=D
Image

[PR]x-spades-x
Bob of Mage
Posts: 227
Joined: 2010-09-29 09:39

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by Bob of Mage »

x-spades-x wrote:next will be an Axis & Allies: Project Reality Game.=D
It would sell more widely than say PR underwear and maybe bring in more people.
lukeyu2005
Posts: 226
Joined: 2010-11-01 02:48

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by lukeyu2005 »

Maybe those nuclear disarmament plans Obama is talking about got so far that there were no longer any operational nukes in the world. Or they signed some kind of non armagendon treaty. So these PR wars can take place.

But seeing there isn't any war that directly involves Russia and america so technically this could just be a second cold war or something.
elerik
Posts: 43
Joined: 2010-10-07 06:13

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by elerik »

I hope not. Not more cold war crisys. That last one was pretty pretty close to start end of world. And this is still posible anyway. But not so open like before. I hope humans found their bains. Specialy that crazy guys in goverments. Thay are crazy like wild dogs. For example russia officialy confess that if thay will response thay can start nuke reaction in our atmosphere and destroy whole planet. We should not forget, this is our spacemothership and we are all in one desk. War should stay in virtual reality like PR (if humans want war) but at out we should find our soul, respect to life, respect to Earth, respect and tolerate to each other and finally start working on true things and not fight on nothing. Iam very sad from this :-(
Hom many of you understand :-( ????
Doc.Pock
Posts: 2899
Joined: 2010-08-23 14:53

Re: The Project Reality World: Hypothetical Map

Post by Doc.Pock »

i understand and agree with you
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”