Lack of INF squads?

[Republic_Commando]

Too many cool vehicles in the game that everyone wants to use.

[H.Maverick]

yeah i think it is a bit boring because i don't see much inf anymore everyting is tank, apc, trans helicopter, attack helicopter, jet, mortar, and logi, one inf squad and that is a sniper that locks his/her squad every time

[alvina]

Indeeeeed. The suckiest part with PR now. Played Karbal today, 32vs32, when I looked on the map, I could count one full squad and 4 other blue spots on the map, no clue where the rest is. It's quite intresting because sometimes a full server feels like 10vs10 and sometimes it feels like 100vs100, I prefer the 100vs100 feeling. My personal suggestion is that it's to many viechles on the maps. And the maps is not balanced. On Kashan, you can bet on a BH, JET, CAS, MORTAR, SNIPER, APC, TANK and one INF squad. And I starting to se a pattern. In most games it's the noobs wanting all the Good stuff, in PR there's these lazy old veteran ******** who just wan'ts the easy, quick comfortable stuff wich makes them feel like god, as Jets, tanks and apcs. I dont see any reason at all why US in karbala needs 1 tank, CAS, STRYKER, CROW Hmve and original Hmve. FORCE THE OLD ONES INTO BATTLE AGAIN!

[HMARS]

To some degree it's just become about the limitations of the technology... If we could get a giant 128v128 game and maybe reduce the asset ratio a bit, then there'd be plenty of infantry squads simply because there wouldn't be enough assets to go around, and there'd be lots of players who couldn't get or didn't want the specialty assets. Since we're limited to 32v32 at the moment, the problem becomes much more acute... you can't, for instance, give a map half of a chopper to keep the asset ratio down.

[H.Maverick]

yeah is that possible like 100vs100 players or is that impossible? cuz as "alvina" says it's sometimes feel like its 100vs100 and 10vs10 it's soo boring