Should there be MORE supression effect?
-
Mora
- Posts: 2933
- Joined: 2007-08-21 12:37
Re: should there be MORE supression effect?
I think a suppression effect like in crysis is a good way to go. Especially the suppression when a grenade goes off. The entire screen gets blurred and there is some sand on the screen or mud. Also when the grenade goes off the screen will be darken for half a second or something.
-
Megagoth1702
- Posts: 510
- Joined: 2009-01-31 20:19
-
doop-de-doo
- Posts: 827
- Joined: 2009-02-27 12:50
Re: Should there be MORE supression effect?
The suppression effect is possibly simulating the real-life fear of getting shot. Being a simulation, many people still try to shoot the enemy through the suppression effect (even though it's obvious that the enemy has the advantage).
I don't think it needs to be raised to the point that you can't see your own escape route.
I don't think it needs to be raised to the point that you can't see your own escape route.
-
Tymathee
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 2008-06-27 15:40
Re: Should there be MORE supression effect?
I think it does its job, it makes you jolt a little bit, especially the snap of the bullet.
-
goguapsy
- Posts: 3688
- Joined: 2009-06-06 19:12
Re: Should there be MORE supression effect?
Yeah the "sensitive" area ie. the distance you must be from the bullet impact so you get the suppression effect should be increased IMO.
-
elerik
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 2010-10-07 06:13
Re: Should there be MORE supression effect?
But one think coud be added. When you bleeding you see red around smaller circle and your view is worst.
But is it possible make something similar for surrpress ?
In reall, when bullets are close your reflex automatically closing eyes. So you donts see so good.
So around could be gray or black for some second. And you could have tunel effect with actually surrpress effect.
Bad sight, tunel view, smaller perifer view. You could hear your heart beat and breath, sound sounds deeper and you hear just closer sounds for moment. Next effect is on your hands. You can yank with your weapon, so you firing absolutly away.
I think some of this things could be add to surrpress effect
May be if bullets are away it could be like now, and if thay will be very close this effect could change to some.
But is it possible make something similar for surrpress ?
In reall, when bullets are close your reflex automatically closing eyes. So you donts see so good.
So around could be gray or black for some second. And you could have tunel effect with actually surrpress effect.
Bad sight, tunel view, smaller perifer view. You could hear your heart beat and breath, sound sounds deeper and you hear just closer sounds for moment. Next effect is on your hands. You can yank with your weapon, so you firing absolutly away.
I think some of this things could be add to surrpress effect
May be if bullets are away it could be like now, and if thay will be very close this effect could change to some.
-
mxlinus
- Posts: 45
- Joined: 2010-11-08 19:23
Re: Should there be MORE supression effect?
The supression effect is fine just the way it is. Also granade explosion effects should be kept the same. Give the R-DEVs a rest in this case =)
-
Zerostar11
- Posts: 433
- Joined: 2008-12-10 18:43
Re: Should there be MORE supression effect?
Its fine. stop whining.
-
goguapsy
- Posts: 3688
- Joined: 2009-06-06 19:12
Re: Should there be MORE supression effect?
The "tunnel vision" is already in-gameelerik wrote:But one think coud be added. When you bleeding you see red around smaller circle and your view is worst.
But is it possible make something similar for surrpress ?
In reall, when bullets are close your reflex automatically closing eyes. So you donts see so good.
So around could be gray or black for some second. And you could have tunel effect with actually surrpress effect.
Bad sight, tunel view, smaller perifer view. You could hear your heart beat and breath, sound sounds deeper and you hear just closer sounds for moment. Next effect is on your hands. You can yank with your weapon, so you firing absolutly away.
I think some of this things could be add to surrpress effect
May be if bullets are away it could be like now, and if thay will be very close this effect could change to some.
But the other weapon effects are hardcoded I believe. And I think that the chaotic sound of bullets hitting and grenades going off are better than the heartbeat. I can imagine the scene you are picturing, and I gotta say, I think it would be more "pacific" if you could only hear few things, know what I'm saying?
...Zerostar11 wrote: whining.
-
joshua07
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 2009-01-16 22:06
Re: Should there be MORE supression effect?
No more. It's just about right. Add more, and its too much.
-
SGT.Ice
- Posts: 985
- Joined: 2010-01-28 02:47
Re: Should there be MORE supression effect?
Adding more would be serious overkill so drop the topic.

-
Puslox
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 2010-08-31 23:46
Re: Should there be MORE supression effect?
Is it me, or have we secretly been downloading a update? Because whenever I'm healed, I see my vision a little bit blurry when I turn around quickly, but that effect goes away quickly. The same after someone supresses me.
Oh, and what I didn't hear before, EVER: factions using their correct language. How didn't I know any of this when playing PR before?
Oh, and what I didn't hear before, EVER: factions using their correct language. How didn't I know any of this when playing PR before?



