I think most people play pr for kills in the endWicca wrote:Hackers are gay. They play PR for the kills. Thats like having sex to get babies 0.o
Playing PR without PB - observations
-
Zimmer
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: 2008-01-12 00:21
Re: Playing PR without PB - observations
People don't realize that autism doesn't mean they're "stupid". Just socially inept. Like rhino... > > or in a worst case scenario... Wicca. =)- Lithium fox


I found this sentence quite funny and since this is a war game forum I will put it here. No offense to the french just a good laugh.
"Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without an accordion. All you do is leave behind a lot of noisy baggage."
-
killonsight95
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: 2009-03-22 13:06
Re: Playing PR without PB - observations
How do i change that PB sleep seeting thing then?
-
KEIOS
- Posts: 522
- Joined: 2008-09-08 12:43
Re: Playing PR without PB - observations
open console and enter:killonsight95 wrote:How do i change that PB sleep seeting thing then?
pb_Sleep 500
then
pb_writecfg
-
Shovel
- Posts: 860
- Joined: 2010-08-26 14:23
Re: Playing PR without PB - observations
I don't think aimbots would be very effective in PR anyway. You would still have to wait for the deviation to settle.
Shovel009
-
CelticSon
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 2010-06-26 20:58
Re: Playing PR without PB - observations
i dont think so, its an easy thread to disable. but speed and wallhacks are far more anoying.TheBobJeff wrote:I don't think aimbots would be very effective in PR anyway. You would still have to wait for the deviation to settle.
by the way, i call them cheater. hackers are living in a completely other world and have absolutely nothing to do with punks who are invading games. Julian Assange had been a hacker in his young days for example.
-
PLODDITHANLEY
- Posts: 3608
- Joined: 2009-05-02 19:44
Re: Playing PR without PB - observations
The PB sleep setting is tricky:
Big delay 500 lots of info to be sent
Short delay 50/100 far less info
So try em both and let us know?
Big delay 500 lots of info to be sent
Short delay 50/100 far less info
So try em both and let us know?
-
PatrickLA_CA
- Posts: 2243
- Joined: 2009-07-14 09:31
Re: Playing PR without PB - observations
Hmm... I was lagging too today, and got kicked for Loosing Packets 9005 or 90005, is that PB issue?
In-game: Cobra-PR
-
SGT.Ice
- Posts: 985
- Joined: 2010-01-28 02:47
Re: Playing PR without PB - observations
PB has always caused an increase in latency. More most people it causes them to lag. With it off things are fine. Most games PB won't even stop hackers.
I usually go recon and like to spot enemies and watch people swarm them like a pack of rabid rats and eat them alive zimmer. But. That's just me.
I usually go recon and like to spot enemies and watch people swarm them like a pack of rabid rats and eat them alive zimmer. But. That's just me.

-
BenHamish
- Posts: 325
- Joined: 2010-10-17 11:59
Re: Playing PR without PB - observations
I'm going to try a tiny setting like 30.PLODDITHANLEY wrote:The PB sleep setting is tricky:
Big delay 500 lots of info to be sent
Short delay 50/100 far less info
So try em both and let us know?
The only reason to have 500 is to have 499 m/s of computer cycles available for PR (I.e. you have a CPU that can't multi-task).. But the trouble is as you mention it will computeit and then flood the connection to PB with all the data, presumably causing tiny lag spikes.
I'm going to have a fiddle with the minimum time allowed and see if lag is lessened.
-
WithoutPurpose
- Posts: 131
- Joined: 2010-11-26 19:29
Re: Playing PR without PB - observations
Seems like people mix up the terms hacker, cracker and cheater. Meh.. I will try out these "hacks" but just for fun on some COOP or local, but it doesn't look like you'll have much fun with them as you have t deviation etc..


