[Vehicle] BTR60PB

Making or wanting help making your own asset? Check in here
Post Reply
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: [vehicle]BTR60PB

Post by samogon100500 »

162eRI wrote:I second that. Best way is to do the exact same camo (texture) than the MEC BMP camo.
Image

Image

on BMP - copy of yemen camo.

My source - Image

MEC - it's coalition right?Thats why they can be get different camo for vehicles.In russian army - mostly vehicles got different camo for example.Iranian army uses very good painted BTRs only for parades like mostly countries in world.

Iranian BTR in very different camo thats you post for example,but anyway - at parade:
Image
General army unit must be looks like this,but little better
Image


All work going to be final.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Last edited by samogon100500 on 2011-02-22 12:33, edited 3 times in total.
Image
Bellator
Posts: 511
Joined: 2009-07-13 13:52

Re: [vehicle]BTR60PB

Post by Bellator »

MEC - it's coalition right?Thats why they can be get different camo for vehicles
Standard camo looks better because every other conventional faction has a standardized camo in game. MEC also has standardized uniforms, standardized weapons and so forth... a non-standard camo on one vehicle alone would look awfully out of place.
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: [vehicle]BTR60PB

Post by samogon100500 »

Image

Main color little changed.Also - about camo.
Here is both Iranian BTRs,but he got diffirent camo.
Image
Image
Image
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: [vehicle]BTR60PB

Post by samogon100500 »

Bellator wrote:Standard camo looks better because every other conventional faction has a standardized camo in game. MEC also has standardized uniforms, standardized weapons and so forth... a non-standard camo on one vehicle alone would look awfully out of place.
You sure thats MEC to got to much standardizied camo on their vehicles?
Image
All 4 vehicles got same colors,but diffirent camo.
Image
Nebsif
Posts: 1512
Joined: 2009-08-22 07:57

Re: [vehicle]BTR60PB

Post by Nebsif »

uuu good camo on ur BTR60.. me likes it moar than the old one :P
Spush
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4359
Joined: 2007-02-19 02:08

Re: [vehicle]BTR60PB

Post by Spush »

samogon100500 wrote:Image
Image
I like this camo for the MEC BTR and maybe for the future of MEC. It looks more like what you would see in a middle eastern military.

Just try to make some parts of the camo a little more orange.
Nebsif
Posts: 1512
Joined: 2009-08-22 07:57

Re: [vehicle]BTR60PB

Post by Nebsif »

Will u guys chillax and let him work, every single one of u has a diff opinion about how teh camo should look.. :S
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: [vehicle]BTR60PB

Post by samogon100500 »

Nebsif wrote:Will u guys chillax and let him work, every single one of u has a diff opinion about how teh camo should look.. :S
Im my opinion - for desert better last camo.To much orange camo - would makes APC for parrots like this:
Image
but not for soldiers IMO.

APC must be stealth in high distance if it's possible.Also - looks like camo on photo using only for parades.I think last one would be better that others.Also - Russian community will see thats APCs more rusty(~50 years it's very very old),you - got another opinion - they must be painted thats they already "baked" from the factory.

Also geometry LOD0 would be final for APC version.
So here is 3 diffirent versions - APC,Modernized APC and ACV.
Image
Image
Image
Image

APC got KPVT 14.5x115mm and PKT 7.62x54R,Modernized version use Prototype cannon for BTR-80A(For this one - they standart),they got PKT 7.62x54R,30x165mm cannon and 30x29mm AG-17 grenade launcher.ACV unarmed and will be use as static.
Last edited by samogon100500 on 2011-02-22 20:34, edited 2 times in total.
Image
J.F.Leusch69
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2988
Joined: 2008-04-23 16:37

Re: [vehicle]BTR60PB

Post by J.F.Leusch69 »

take a closer look at the BTR60 with BTR80A turret:
YouTube - Modernised BTR-60 & BRDM-2 shooting
exhaustpipes, some rails and other details are either missing on your model or modelled wrong
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: [vehicle]BTR60PB

Post by samogon100500 »

'[R-DEV wrote:J.F.Leusch69;1552939']take a closer look at the BTR60 with BTR80A turret:
YouTube - Modernised BTR-60 & BRDM-2 shooting
exhaustpipes, some rails and other details are either missing on your model or modelled wrong
It's PR cannon from BTR-80A,and i think they could be use at this one,no sense to make new model.Difference between that - added AG-17.Also am still work with upgrade kit.

I don't forget it,just it's still no optimize :D
Image
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: [vehicle]BTR60PB

Post by samogon100500 »

LODs for APC and ACV done.
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/3953/59891406.jpg
APC
Lod0 - 8862tris
Lod1 - 6227tris
Lod2 - 2645tris
Lod3 - 319tris
ACV
Lod0 - 9012tris
Lod1 - 5845tris
Lod2 - 2324tris
Lod3 - 285tris

Bad news - Cannon for BTR-60PBM a little different thats BTR-80A cannon.I must make new cannon =(
Image
motherdear
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2637
Joined: 2007-03-20 14:09

Re: [Vehicle] BTR60PB

Post by motherdear »

to high tri counts... or add another lod in between.
Image

[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto: "Talking squad level tactics in bed is actually a little known aphrodisiac"
[R-CON]Pantera : "maybe you might learn that we are not super intelligent beings chained in UKF's basement being forced to work on this".
J.F.Leusch69
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2988
Joined: 2008-04-23 16:37

Re: [Vehicle] BTR60PB

Post by J.F.Leusch69 »

pciture is quite small.

ACV should at least have the antenna rails at lod1 too.
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: [Vehicle] BTR60PB

Post by Rhino »

final lod needs to be under 100tris...
Image
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: [Vehicle] BTR60PB

Post by samogon100500 »

[R-DEV]J.F.Leusch69 wrote:pciture is quite small.

ACV should at least have the antenna rails at lod1 too.
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:final lod needs to be under 100tris...
OK going do that.
[R-DEV]motherdear wrote:to high tri counts... or add another lod in between.
To high where?Between (Lod0 to Lod1) or (Lod1 to lod2)?
Last edited by samogon100500 on 2011-02-24 15:46, edited 1 time in total.
Image
DankE_SPB
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3678
Joined: 2008-09-30 22:29

Re: [Vehicle] BTR60PB

Post by DankE_SPB »

samogon100500 wrote:It's PR cannon from BTR-80A,and i think they could be use at this one,no sense to make new model.Difference between that - added AG-17.Also am still work with upgrade kit.
Bad news - Cannon for BTR-60PBM a little different thats BTR-80A cannon.I must make new cannon =(
Just leave the turret from the 6MB turret from BTR-80A with 2A72 and PKT. There is a shitload of turrets on the same base and for now usual turret with KPVT and 6MB is more than enough, leave it as it is.
Image
[R-DEV]Z-trooper: you damn russian bear spy ;P - WWJND?
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: [Vehicle] BTR60PB

Post by samogon100500 »

Am start work with it at same time with BTR,but BTR got highest priority.Also - here is second project,based on BTR fragments.

Image
Image
Image
162eRI wrote:Cool the upgrade BTR 60 with a with BTR80A turret! I love it ^^

So, which ACV version are you going to make? I thought they all got a weird turret on top?
http://en.valka.cz/files/btr60pu-3_602.gif

Good luck
Good,all what needed to me,also - problem to put it at my texture,ACV should be use 2 textures(Body and wheel),at wheel I got some space,but it's not to much.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Image
motherdear
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2637
Joined: 2007-03-20 14:09

Re: [Vehicle] BTR60PB

Post by motherdear »

DO NOT SPREAD OUT OVER SO MANY PROJECTS AT A TIME. YOU ARE ALREADY HALF ASSING YOUR MODELS.... PISSES ME OFF TBH
Image

[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto: "Talking squad level tactics in bed is actually a little known aphrodisiac"
[R-CON]Pantera : "maybe you might learn that we are not super intelligent beings chained in UKF's basement being forced to work on this".
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: [Vehicle] BTR60PB

Post by samogon100500 »

[R-DEV]motherdear wrote:DO NOT SPREAD OUT OVER SO MANY PROJECTS AT A TIME. YOU ARE ALREADY HALF ASSING YOUR MODELS.... PISSES ME OFF TBH
Calm down - this is one project because 60% details from BTR-60 :razz:
Ok lets stay on topic - antenna was terrible =(
If make full copy - it's makes around 1000-2000tris,what not so good.
Image
Image
Last edited by samogon100500 on 2011-02-26 16:48, edited 2 times in total.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Community Modding”