Jets

simeon5541 · Post by **simeon5541** » 2011-03-10 21:55

It is needed only few more maps with jets,
so we can practice for MP.

Doc.Pock · Post by **Doc.Pock** » 2011-03-11 22:28

merk has a jet training server up in kashan. :=)

saXoni · Post by **saXoni** » 2011-03-11 23:02

The Merk server is also running different maps, like Quinling and Silent Eagle.

ShockUnitBlack · Post by **ShockUnitBlack** » 2011-03-11 23:37

Never mind.

simeon5541 · Post by **simeon5541** » 2011-03-12 00:43

It is easier to blame bots if they crush planes

Doc.Pock · Post by **Doc.Pock** » 2011-03-12 08:57

planes spawn instanteniously on merk AFAIK

simeon5541 · Post by **simeon5541** » 2011-03-14 00:16

Doc.Pock wrote:planes spawn instanteniously on merk AFAIK

I am talking about singleplayer,not about training serves.

RealKail · Post by **RealKail** » 2011-03-15 16:12

simeon5541 wrote:I am talking about singleplayer,not about training serves.

Why does it even matter? It's a place to go and get all the practice you need since it's not treated as an actual deployment server. It's there to help you practice, which is what you wanted.

simeon5541 · Post by **simeon5541** » 2011-03-15 20:43

RealKail wrote:Why does it even matter? It's a place to go and get all the practice you need since it's not treated as an actual deployment server. It's there to help you practice, which is what you wanted.

OK I will say real reason because I think this would be good:
15 years in future I think there will be no one to play PR in MP,
so it would be good to have more SP air maps.
Example is that I still play Red Alert 2.

cheesus182 · Post by **cheesus182** » 2011-05-22 11:16

I do agree, there are way too few air maps on PR.
In SP as well as in MP.
Out of every 20 games I play I might get one game of a map with jets where I will probably not get to join/make the CAS squad which means I can?t fly.

simeon5541 · Post by **simeon5541** » 2011-05-23 22:23

cheesus182 wrote:I do agree, there are way too few air maps on PR.
In SP as well as in MP.
Out of every 20 games I play I might get one game of a map with jets where I will probably not get to join/make the CAS squad which means I can?t fly.

Finally someone share my view !!
Silent Eagle 64 or upcoming Black Gold would be great to play in SP !!

mangeface · Post by **mangeface** » 2011-07-06 17:08

simeon5541 wrote:OK I will say real reason because I think this would be good:
15 years in future I think there will be no one to play PR in MP,
so it would be good to have more SP air maps.
Example is that I still play Red Alert 2.

In 15 years, PR will have it's own stand alone games, so I'm not worried about anything.

Can I be the first to say that a jet is more worthless than an attack helo in PR? You have to wait for them to burn a hole in the sky to turn around for another attack run. They need a ridiculously long *** runway to land on. And they don't carry as much munitions as an attack helo. Plus, with attack helos you can guide your own missles without the use of a ground troop with a GTLD. Everyone needs to stop watching Top Gun and start watching Airwolf.

H.Maverick · Post by **H.Maverick** » 2011-07-06 18:27

darkside12 wrote:In 15 years, PR will have it's own stand alone games, so I'm not worried about anything.

Can I be the first to say that a jet is more worthless than an attack helo in PR? You have to wait for them to burn a hole in the sky to turn around for another attack run. They need a ridiculously long *** runway to land on. And they don't carry as much munitions as an attack helo. Plus, with attack helos you can guide your own missles without the use of a ground troop with a GTLD. Everyone needs to stop watching Top Gun and start watching Airwolf.

I do agree, BUT the A-10 can do massive damage and it get's to the location quicker than an attack helo, so it's good to have.

Phantom2 · Post by **Phantom2** » 2011-07-06 18:47

darkside12 wrote:In 15 years, PR will have it's own stand alone games, so I'm not worried about anything.

Can I be the first to say that a jet is more worthless than an attack helo in PR? You have to wait for them to burn a hole in the sky to turn around for another attack run. They need a ridiculously long *** runway to land on. And they don't carry as much munitions as an attack helo. Plus, with attack helos you can guide your own missles without the use of a ground troop with a GTLD. Everyone needs to stop watching Top Gun and start watching Airwolf.

That's because Battlefield engines really limit the effectiveness of jets. The fact you have to get to 1000 feet in order to use ordinance is really bad. Normally you'd have all these sensors at 25,000 feet in order to bomb them, you wouldn't even need the assistance of anything. And the fishbowl size maps prevent you from really using it's speed. Jets are practically useless, and they should probably be removed to be honest. The support they actually give seems to be little to none as they get shot down easily with the huge limitations.

Maverick · Post by **Maverick** » 2011-07-06 23:33

I really REALLY don't see the point of "training" flying a jet in coop. The damn bots are better than me and I know DAMN well how to fly! The bots have their aimbotting missiles, and the AA locks on and not more than a second later, BAM. Dead. Flying against bots is the worst thing about "training". Hell, even the bots take you out in 2 shots or even one because they always get a damn headshot in when your infantry. Training needs to be re-evaluated. The unofficial training back in I believe .85 or .8, had alot of jets to practice(and against other players, not bots) and if you mess up, meh, grab another one, that was just an 80 billion dollar aircraft but they'll give you another one

Jets

Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets

Re: Jets