uhh, actvision also does it but WORSE. COD? SAME GAME. the gameplay hasn't changed since Modern Warfare. And GH? Dead. Why? Oversaturation. these publishers need to realize that we(mainly smart PC gamers not little kiddie console "gamers") want innovation and some VARIETY in games. Thats why I love PR. you can do SO many things, and EVERY game is different(unless you play the same maps over and over)USNCaseySmith wrote:If it is true then I have to ask, WHY EA??!?!Your looking at the company that puts out many of the same games year after year and claims the monumental changes when in reality its a washed up version of the last year, yes Im talking to you Madden and Need for Speed -_-
No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
-
Maverick
- Posts: 920
- Joined: 2008-06-22 06:56
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?


-
xseeyax
- Posts: 228
- Joined: 2007-03-14 20:15
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
You are also talking about the company that brought one of the biggest shooters of all time that is still being played these many years later and the basis of PR. Also the company that is making what is going to be a legendary game that can and WILL beat out ANY other shooter on the market. Yes EA may make some bad choices but they still put out great games every once in a while. If this is true I'm glad that it's with a company that will take these guys somewhere.USNCaseySmith wrote:If it is true then I have to ask, WHY EA??!?!Your looking at the company that puts out many of the same games year after year and claims the monumental changes when in reality its a washed up version of the last year, yes Im talking to you Madden and Need for Speed -_-
If you believe in Jesus Christ , have accepted him as your lord and savior, and are 100% proud of it, put this in your sig .
-
Pudgeinabf2
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 2011-02-28 03:13
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
You're also talking about the company responsible for:xseeyax wrote:You are also talking about the company that brought one of the biggest shooters of all time that is still being played these many years later and the basis of PR. Also the company that is making what is going to be a legendary game that can and WILL beat out ANY other shooter on the market. Yes EA may make some bad choices but they still put out great games every once in a while. If this is true I'm glad that it's with a company that will take these guys somewhere.
Deadspace 2's horrible marketing campaign
Dante's Inferno (everything)
Bad Company 1&2&expansion (ok this fail is mostly down too DICE codifying bf2)
Dragon Age 2
Crysis 2 (for existing)
EA isn't responsible for alot except throwing money at developers and setting the direction for the game (IE make me a fast paced explosive shooter rivaling CODX). And marketing....god i hate their marketing campaigns.
But in the end if any game fails, its ultimately the developers fault, from what I've seen and played of PR (about 60hrs now), they should be fine. Just if some corporate bigwig is telling you to add anything (like a child murder scene or something) for "shock value" or some other reason...don't for gods sake do it, stick up to them, remind them why they hired you, and release the game when its ready the way you want it.
And presuming you stick to the same naming scheme (taliban, real battlefields etc.), stick to your guns when some dumbass reporter comes gunning for you, don't back down like....oh dear EA and medal of honour did....We know you're not dishonouring soldiers, you know it, don't let another reporter brand us with idiotic labels.
EDIT
Just case in point of EA pushing games out before they're ready. Crysis 2, the PC forums exploded with rage (most of it pointless), but the truth was the game wasn't ready to be released. First impressions are forever, a buggy first day is incomprehensibly worse than a 2 month delay. Hell people have been waiting years for diablo3, spit, polish and beta's from a faithful community help create an awesome game.
Also I love PR:BF2, I wish I'd found it years ago. (Ironically the only good thing I got out of bc2 was buying bf2 out of sheer disgust, and from there found PR.)
Last edited by Pudgeinabf2 on 2011-04-01 10:19, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Crysis 2
Reason: Crysis 2
-
Nebsif
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: 2009-08-22 07:57
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
Add crysis 2 to the above list, its an abomination for pc.
-
karambaitos
- Posts: 3788
- Joined: 2008-08-02 14:14
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
and red alert 3 , C&C, medal of honor 2010 ect.Nebsif wrote:Add crysis 2 to the above list, its an abomination for pc.
There is only one unforgivable lie That is the lie that says, This is the end, you are the conqueror, you have achieved it and now all that remains is to build walls higher and shelter behind them. Now, the lie says, the world is safe.? The Great Khan.
40k is deep like that.
40k is deep like that.
-
Spush
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 4359
- Joined: 2007-02-19 02:08
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
They may have ruined C&C series but don't bring C&C Generals into this!
-
Herbiie
- Posts: 2022
- Joined: 2009-08-24 11:21
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
But wait....[R-DEV]Gaz wrote:Lastly, a LOT of people have already assumed this is a joke. We got bored of joking on April 1st 2 years ago.
This could be a joke o.O
-
Koolaid-maker
- Posts: 29
- Joined: 2009-11-04 18:54
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
I still don't quite believe it
??:
Even though I'm still scared as hell
Even though I'm still scared as hell
-
Element-X_IV
- Posts: 134
- Joined: 2009-07-05 00:24
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
Bah! April fools day, why!?!?!?
Now there's chaos around the PR Forums trying to figure out whats true and what isn't.
So if it is coming to an end.
What about the Community factions and other stuff people have made for the mod which have not yet finished? Dump it in the trash?
Now there's chaos around the PR Forums trying to figure out whats true and what isn't.
So if it is coming to an end.
What about the Community factions and other stuff people have made for the mod which have not yet finished? Dump it in the trash?
-
NyteMyre
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: 2008-08-31 10:10
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?

THE TENSION!!! ITS KILLING MEEEEEE
-
sweedensniiperr
- Posts: 2784
- Joined: 2009-09-18 10:27
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
better of just sell the shit it's not making enough money. bored of it aswell.
-
rushn
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: 2010-01-01 02:51
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
what? i dont evensweedensniiperr wrote:better of just sell the shit it's not making enough money. bored of it aswell.
-
PatrickLA_CA
- Posts: 2243
- Joined: 2009-07-14 09:31
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
"Aprilililili" from Macedonia aswell... I ain't cancelling my Arma 2 Combined Operations order.'Limeni[BiH wrote:;1571751']its April fool joke or however you call it
as we say in bosnia: "aprlililililililili"
hjave a nice day!
In-game: Cobra-PR
-
USNCaseySmith
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 2011-03-10 00:12
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?
Yes this is true, but activision actually did little tiny things to make COD fun, and in the end, I do find COD just plain wicked fun. I can play Zombies for hours, on the otherhand, talking about NfS, it always just ends up being a regurgitated game claiming "The Most Realistic Driving" when its not, its arcadish and stupid, the only ones I really liked stopped at Most Wanted and Carbon. As far as Madden, well Madden is a whole nother beast, you see this is there trick. They take about four or five features out every 2 years or 3 years, then they add them in 5 years later with a different name and the same look, 5 features. Or it ends up being some inconsiquential feature, I mean Madden 12 is 'supposed' to have "Suprise Onside Kicks". Really? Thats their big feature this year?? Thats whats supposed to keep everyone playing, thank you, but Ill take my 60$ elsewhere EA. I mean they havent even gotten the animations to look great yet either, theyve had over 10 years and about 3 or 4 as the ONLY NFL franchise out there and they cant even get fluid and good animations (Balls passing through defenders hands, recievers having the ball go straight through them, weird tackles, etc. etc.)Maverick wrote:uhh, actvision also does it but WORSE. COD? SAME GAME. the gameplay hasn't changed since Modern Warfare. And GH? Dead. Why? Oversaturation. these publishers need to realize that we(mainly smart PC gamers not little kiddie console "gamers") want innovation and some VARIETY in games. Thats why I love PR. you can do SO many things, and EVERY game is different(unless you play the same maps over and over)
Exactly, although, out of all of those, Id have to say I found BF BC2 a fairly fun game, the same with the first BF BC, the first was definately not as CODish as some might think, it leaned more toward PR with squads and huge maps and such.Pudgeinabf2 wrote:You're also talking about the company responsible for:
Deadspace 2's horrible marketing campaign
Dante's Inferno (everything)
Bad Company 1&2&expansion (ok this fail is mostly down too DICE codifying bf2)
Dragon Age 2
Crysis 2 (for existing)
EA isn't responsible for alot except throwing money at developers and setting the direction for the game (IE make me a fast paced explosive shooter rivaling CODX). And marketing....god i hate their marketing campaigns.
But in the end if any game fails, its ultimately the developers fault, from what I've seen and played of PR (about 60hrs now), they should be fine. Just if some corporate bigwig is telling you to add anything (like a child murder scene or something) for "shock value" or some other reason...don't for gods sake do it, stick up to them, remind them why they hired you, and release the game when its ready the way you want it.
And presuming you stick to the same naming scheme (taliban, real battlefields etc.), stick to your guns when some dumbass reporter comes gunning for you, don't back down like....oh dear EA and medal of honour did....We know you're not dishonouring soldiers, you know it, don't let another reporter brand us with idiotic labels.
EDIT
Just case in point of EA pushing games out before they're ready. Crysis 2, the PC forums exploded with rage (most of it pointless), but the truth was the game wasn't ready to be released. First impressions are forever, a buggy first day is incomprehensibly worse than a 2 month delay. Hell people have been waiting years for diablo3, spit, polish and beta's from a faithful community help create an awesome game.
Also I love PR:BF2, I wish I'd found it years ago. (Ironically the only good thing I got out of bc2 was buying bf2 out of sheer disgust, and from there found PR.)
Again, save redalert 3 and onward, the generals series was pretty solid, plenty of mods out for it now. Backwards from Generals is RA2 which I believe is where EA took control, that was good too and backwards from that were fine games.karambaitos wrote:and red alert 3 , C&C, medal of honor 2010 ect.
-
Jigsaw
- Posts: 4498
- Joined: 2008-09-15 02:31
Re: No more BF:PR? Thoughts? Feelings?

Locking this, please discuss in the original thread.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CKjNcSUNt8
"I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end... "
"I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end... "



