Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Locked
stealth420
Posts: 256
Joined: 2009-09-29 19:59

Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by stealth420 »

Just sitting back remembering when operation archer was better with the U.S. fighting the taliban, then the Canadian Government answered my prayers and is currently pulling out of afganistan.



I got an interesting idea that has to do with the real life realism comparison of the game. Since Canada is pulling out of operations in afganistan, can the U.S. faction move back in on Operation Archer? If they do come back, i am proposing an asset arrangement that will make the map better and still keep the balance between teams. But still be similar in some ways as the old school version of the map before canada moved in.


For the U.S. Moving back in.

2 Transport Hueys
1 Cobra
1 Bradley APC ( Will not flip on terrain like Canadas APCs)
1 LAV-25 APC
1 Crows HMV
4 Regular HMVs
2 Transport Trucks
2 Logi trucks


As you can see the cobra on this map would take a very skilled pilot to not get shot down by constant threat of 50 cal fire. I would take up the challenge and put together different strategys.


For the Taliban

+ 2 ZPU / Quad Cannon AAA ( One Near Airport, Other near Taliban main)
+ 2 Technicals 50 cal

The Taliban will still recieve the same amount of assets plus these 2 changes.


Post what you think
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Rudd »

1 Cobra
definately not gonna happen.
1 Bradley APC
how many bradleys are there in Afghanistan...
Image
stealth420
Posts: 256
Joined: 2009-09-29 19:59

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by stealth420 »

We have CAS in Project reality and they use it in reality every day, give the players the air support they neeeeed!
Titan
Posts: 294
Joined: 2008-09-13 15:55

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Titan »

[R-DEV]Rudd wrote:definately not gonna happen.



how many bradleys are there in Afghanistan...
and how many are operated by Marines... :wink:

Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have done
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Rudd »

stealth420 wrote:We have CAS in Project reality and they use it in reality every day, give the players the air support they neeeeed!
IRL the USMC etc try to arrange engagements so that they cannot lose, and even losing one man is a big deal

Ingame, we need to give the Taliban a 50% chance of winning if both teams have equal skill
Image
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Viper5 »

[R-DEV]Rudd wrote:definately not gonna happen.



how many bradleys are there in Afghanistan...
Considering maps like Basrah are still UK v. INS, I doubt this will happen.

And then even were the CF replaced, I'd think it'd be the Army rather than the USMC, as the USMC is mainly w/ TF Leatherneck in Helmand while it appears the Army has control of Kandahar on east from what I got on the ISAF website.
Last edited by Viper5 on 2011-07-09 00:46, edited 1 time in total.
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Rhino »

Viper5 wrote:Considering maps like Basrah are still UK v. INS, I doubt this will happen.
Indeed, many of PR's maps are now historical to a sense, such as Basrah and Fallujah.

This map would be no different and would not justify us removing the Canadians off the map, although this wouldn't mean we couldn't put the US on as well as the Canadians as they both use the same voices and just have each force on different layers.
Image
Stealthgato
Posts: 2676
Joined: 2010-10-22 02:42

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Stealthgato »

Would be interesting to have an insurgency map with a heavy CAS asset present.
Peeta
Posts: 1204
Joined: 2008-11-28 02:05

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Peeta »

Stealthgato wrote:Would be interesting to have an insurgency map with a heavy CAS asset present.
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f316-2 ... n-wip.html
ledo1222
Posts: 689
Joined: 2009-03-16 01:39

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by ledo1222 »

Remove a faction from the map, okay USA u can have all the maps too. Remeber that this game inset political realistic, like the MEC Arnt real.
-The Mods cant Silence me!
-Its all a Conspiracy all OF IT!
-Boys get the duck tape ready..... Umm.....

Been palying PR:ARMA2 since 0.1v beta
Image
USMC scout sniper
Posts: 487
Joined: 2010-01-03 04:21

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by USMC scout sniper »

Armored APC's, trucks, small arms, vs small arms AA and technicals? Sounds like a massacre to me.
HELL HAVE NO FURY LIKE ME WITH A M249 SAW PIP!
ledo1222
Posts: 689
Joined: 2009-03-16 01:39

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by ledo1222 »

USMC scout sniper wrote:Armored APC's, trucks, small arms, vs small arms AA and technicals? Sounds like a massacre to me.
And the Taliban and INS always win.
-The Mods cant Silence me!
-Its all a Conspiracy all OF IT!
-Boys get the duck tape ready..... Umm.....

Been palying PR:ARMA2 since 0.1v beta
Image
Gaz
Posts: 9032
Joined: 2004-09-23 10:19

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Gaz »

stealth420 wrote:Just sitting back remembering when operation archer was better with the U.S. fighting the taliban, then the Canadian Government answered my prayers and is currently pulling out of afganistan.



I got an interesting idea that has to do with the real life realism comparison of the game. Since Canada is pulling out of operations in afganistan, can the U.S. faction move back in on Operation Archer? If they do come back, i am proposing an asset arrangement that will make the map better and still keep the balance between teams. But still be similar in some ways as the old school version of the map before canada moved in.


For the U.S. Moving back in.

2 Transport Hueys
1 Cobra
1 Bradley APC ( Will not flip on terrain like Canadas APCs)
1 LAV-25 APC
1 Crows HMV
4 Regular HMVs
2 Transport Trucks
2 Logi trucks


As you can see the cobra on this map would take a very skilled pilot to not get shot down by constant threat of 50 cal fire. I would take u the challenge and put together different strategys.


For the Taliban

+ 2 ZPU / Quad Cannon AAA ( One Near Airport, Other near Taliban main)
+ 2 Technicals 50 cal

The Taliban will still recieve the same amount of assets plus these 2 changes.


Post what you think
It's very kind that you have just offered to make us a brand new CAN vs TAL map to reinforce your point. I'm already looking forward to your progress updates in the community modding forums. Or did I miss the point? Maybe you missed mine :)
Image
"By profession I am a soldier, and take pride in that fact. But I am prouder, infinitely prouder, to be a father". - Gen Douglas MacAurthur.
-Proud wearer of motorcycle helmets since 1998.
Dev1200
Posts: 1708
Joined: 2008-11-30 23:01

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Dev1200 »

stealth420 wrote:an interesting idea
real life realism
can the U.S. faction move back in on Operation Archer?
i am proposing an asset arrangement that will make the map better
I would take up the challenge and put together different strategys.
Post what you think
I think this is in the wrong area ;)


The best way to add something into the game (Such as factions, maps, vehicles, weapons) is to make them yourself with real life (realism) references to current (or very near future) specifics.

You can post your work in the proper section somewhere around here.


Unless there is a crucial need for a fix for a faction, it won't be changed unless confirmation from MA's and 9001 references to back it up.
Image
Psyrus
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3841
Joined: 2006-06-19 17:10

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Psyrus »

You know, I had this strange feeling I recalled the OP's name when I read this thread. So I had a gander at his post history and then stumbled upon this and it all made sense:

https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f18-pr ... -ah64.html

Basically, another veiled attempt to get an attack chopper into an insurgency map :roll:
Durkie
Posts: 264
Joined: 2009-01-12 08:10

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Durkie »

If you want heavy cas on insurgency maps you should have to wait for the 4 km insurgency maps I gues
"Goddam it, you'll never get the Purple Heart hiding in a foxhole! Follow me!"
Captain Henry P. Jim Crowe
Tarranauha200
Posts: 1166
Joined: 2010-08-28 20:57

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Tarranauha200 »

Insurgency mod should be renamed as "Poor US Army that cant afford CAS versus Insurgents guarding random weapon boxes".

Give blufor CAS. It would be interesting if you would have to constantly fear being shelled from above as insurgent.

Ok, ok Im asset whore and I think kashan is one of the best maps along with maps like Iron eagle, Burning sands(When its fixed), Silent eagle, Yamalia...
Dunehunter
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 12110
Joined: 2006-12-17 14:42

Re: Canada Pulls Out/OP.Archer ???

Post by Dunehunter »

If it talks like a suggestion, walks like a suggestion and smells like a suggestion...it's probably a suggestion.

Locked.

[R-MOD]Jigsaw] I am drunk. I decided to come home early because I can''t realy seea nyithng. I hthknk i madea bad choicce. :|
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”