[New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Locked

Which default video setting best matches your settings for PR?

High
557
71%
Medium
129
16%
Low
100
13%
 
Total votes: 786

B0ng_McPuffin
Posts: 28
Joined: 2011-07-22 22:00

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by B0ng_McPuffin »

PFunk wrote:Its been my experience that even dropping my settings has done little to change the lag problems I've sporadically experienced.

Settings all high here and have been for the last 3 years.

Intl E8400 OC'd to 3.3 Ghz
EVGA Nvidia 8800 GT Superclocked edition
4 gigs Mushkin Ram
ASUS P5K-E
^ This. Its not a graphics card problem on the consumer end, its an optimization either on the development end, or possibly its an unforeseen server-side problem that no one has caught yet. Either way, even dropping all settings down to the bare bones on low, I still get what I believe is occlusion induced lag, theres simply too many polygons being processed and the occlusion settings probably aren't tweaked right. If I'm in an alley way, surrounded by buildings, my card shouldn't be rendering and keeping track of buildings and vehicles that I cannot see on the next block over.

I believe WurmOnline is the place I learned about this, they had an option to enable/disable "occlusion culling". I think in one of the patches to that game during its Alpha phase was to fix the sporadic skipping/frame drop when you looked into a huge forest or heavily populated area by lowering the circle around you that your card rendered based on line-of-sight.

What I noticed in that game is that when I stepped into a mineshaft or a building and I couldn't see the surrounding environment, my frame-rates dramatically increased.

Also, I believe it has the ability to work on the Field of View function as well, as in, anything outside of a certain cone of vision (it extends past your monitor, like overscan on a TV) isn't rendered either, so if you're looking north in the middle of the city, the city behind you isn't rendered/kept track of in video-memory client-side to free up resources for rendering the scene you are actually looking at.

Sorry if that makes no sense, it was a loooooooong time ago that I Alpha-tested that game and I'm sure I messed some of the details up, but Occlusion Culling is definitely the right term.

EDIT: Forgot to relate this to my PR:BF2 experience. It seems like the entire map is rendered and loaded into memory at once and everything is static more or less, and no matter where you are in a map, say like Fallujah, if you look towards the city part of the map with all the buildings from ANYWHERE on the map, it seems to slow your frame-rate down, even if you're well outside the "foggy" view-distance limiter, which doesn't actually stop the polygons from being rendered and loaded into my video memory.

Maybe bring the occlusion diameter down the the view-distance diameter, so basically if you can't see it, it doesn't exist (as far as visual rendering goes) and then additionally, when you transition from out-doors to in-doors your occlusion diameter should drop as well, unless you're like on the roof or looking out a window at the city or something.
Last edited by B0ng_McPuffin on 2011-10-10 00:01, edited 1 time in total.
Pruskis
Posts: 39
Joined: 2011-04-10 01:36

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by Pruskis »

PFunk wrote:Its been my experience that even dropping my settings has done little to change the lag problems I've sporadically experienced.

Settings all high here and have been for the last 3 years.

Intl E8400 OC'd to 3.3 Ghz
EVGA Nvidia 8800 GT Superclocked edition
4 gigs Mushkin Ram
ASUS P5K-E
for what stupid reason i am unable to max out having

q6600
9800gtx
4gigs
Asus P5K??

Getting Asus Xonar DX in near future and need to get rid of current mobo, cause of buggy chip it can take up to 50 minutes to boot up pc :(
YankeeSamurai
Posts: 63
Joined: 2011-10-08 09:02

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by YankeeSamurai »

All high, but no AAing. I don't know what my FPS is, but it's definitely sufficient for effective play.

Oh, and I play on a mac. Bootcamp ftw
Problem?
fabioxxxx
Posts: 180
Joined: 2009-07-02 01:12

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by fabioxxxx »

Low 67 12.18%

12.18% people need to get a job, or start selling crack to get a new pc.
Kwalc297
Posts: 178
Joined: 2011-05-02 01:15

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by Kwalc297 »

All maxed 1920 x 1080 8XAA

i5-2500K @3.30
Radeon 6950 2GB stock
Asus P8P67 PRO
8GB ram 2x4

Always above 65 FPS. Only dips below 85 on maps like fallujah, burning sands and im forgetting one or two i think.
Archosaurus
Posts: 258
Joined: 2011-10-09 11:32

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by Archosaurus »

High, I seem to stutter like hell on lower settings.
SterrUwe321
Posts: 80
Joined: 2011-06-28 10:14

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by SterrUwe321 »

1280*1024
All High
Except AA < only 4x

Playing on an older xp system
3.2gb ram
gts 450
2*2.4 cpu

gameplay is allways okay around 50-70fps but in falluja (and all these other fps killer maps) i experience often 20-30fps when i look in special directions (like the middle of the map)
Steeps
Posts: 1994
Joined: 2011-08-15 15:58

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by Steeps »

Highest all around. Don't know my FPS, but it never stutters.

1920x1080 23" Monitor
Core i5-2500k at 4.5GHz (on air)
PNY GTX 460 OC SLI
8GB RAM
Last edited by Steeps on 2011-10-15 21:20, edited 1 time in total.
Image


Image
Phenom 955
Posts: 41
Joined: 2011-08-04 13:56

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by Phenom 955 »

Max settings @ 1920x1080, 8xAA.

AMD Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.4 GHz
Gigabyte 560 Ti @ 1000 MHz
4 GB DDR3 1333 MHz

Running above 65 FPS for everything except Fullujah, etc. I normally get around 35-55 on demanding maps.
Lajning
Posts: 46
Joined: 2009-08-09 19:06

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by Lajning »

Max settings @ 1920x1080, 2xAA

Amd Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.4 GHz
8 GB DDR3 1600MHz G-skill ripjaw x.
Club 3d HD4870 512mb.
Win 7 64 bit.

Just did a testrun today for an hour. FPS was around 40 at the lowest on Korengal Valley.
I'll probably remove AA and lower light and shadows a bit. But the game runs pretty good.
Compared to 35 ish fps as most with my old single core amd 3500+ on all low.
Wicca
Posts: 7336
Joined: 2008-01-05 14:53

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by Wicca »

All high now. Used to be all low. BUT I AM SAVED
Xact Wicca is The Joker. That is all.
dtacs
Posts: 5512
Joined: 2008-12-07 23:30

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by dtacs »

All high other than shadows, makes it easier to see people especially on maps like Kozelsk.
Lajning
Posts: 46
Joined: 2009-08-09 19:06

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by Lajning »

Guys, please. Specify your computer and what resolution you're running. This is a info-thread. Not a "I got bigger internetpenis than you" -thread.

It's a great thread to see what kind of fps can be expected with a certain computer setup at a given resolution/quality setting.
6Skrillex6
Posts: 47
Joined: 2011-11-12 10:07

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by 6Skrillex6 »

OS: Windows 7 Home Premium
GFX Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
RAM: 10 gigabytes, of which two cards are of 4 gigs each and one of 2 gigs.
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU 550 @ 3.20GHz (4CPUs)
Monitor: Running all games with the option at 1920x1080

All game options on PR at High with 8x Anti-Aliasing

My average FPS is about 90 so this is a fairly cheap set-up I highly recommend!
Cassius
Posts: 3958
Joined: 2008-04-14 17:37

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by Cassius »

All high now. You can do that nowdays after pimping yourself out a weekend.
|TG|cap_Kilgore
Image
A.Finest
Posts: 776
Joined: 2011-06-07 12:27

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by A.Finest »

All settings on high & x8 Anti-Aliasing ;)
UTurista
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 985
Joined: 2011-06-14 14:13

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by UTurista »

[All max settings]

(laptop)
CPU: i3
GPU: Radeon 5730 (2GB VRAM) [1360x768]
RAM: 4GB
HDD: 500GB
Avg, FPS: 20-30

(desktop)
CPU: i5
GPU: Radeon 6950 (1GB VRAM) [1600x900]
RAM: 8GB
SDD: 60GB
Avg, FPS: 100
Image


Dont question the wikipedia! Just because it reports different things on different languages does not make it unreliable source!
osmolusmu
Posts: 12
Joined: 2011-10-30 16:57

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by osmolusmu »

FINALLY got my new PC (laptop, had a thread about it few weeks ago) and PR runs great, everything on max and AAx8
CPU: Intel i7-2670QM at 2.2GHz with 4 cores
GPU: nVidia GeForce GT550M with 2Gb of memory
RAM: 6Gb of DDR-3 at 1333MHz
HDD: 500Gb
And just love it :D
EDIT:
Dont know about the FPS yet, I have not tested it but not a single lagg and runs smooth like h*ll!
Doc.Pock
Posts: 2899
Joined: 2010-08-23 14:53

Re: [New for 2011!] Which level of graphics settings do you play?

Post by Doc.Pock »

OS: Windows 7 Home Premium
GFX Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
RAM: 6 gigabytes, of which two cards are of 2 gigs each and one of 2 gigs.
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 750 @ 4.06GHz (4CPUs)
Monitor: Running all games with the option at 1920x1080

All game options on PR at High with 8x Anti-Aliasing

My average FPS is 100 but mumble overlay showed 210 fps on kashan yesterday :D
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”