It isn't. Maybe only when you ignore a certain part of the Supporting Members, who are Supporting Members for special privileges on the Tactical Gamer server alone, is it different.Shovel wrote:The TG kicking is different.
On Tactical Gamer, you're allowed to play whether you're a Supporting Member or not. The only way you can play as long as you wish, however, is by paying Tactical Gamer, otherwise you will be inevitably removed for a Supporting Member.
From what I can see, =]H[= doesn't engage in making profits off their server by practice or policy. It was a single admin acting of his own will, who I assume was punished in some way or will be. Tactical Gamer, on the other hand, actively engages in making a profit off their server, though I doubt they do so on purpose.Profiting privately from BF2 is illegal and against EA EULA
To be fair, the Supporting Membership doesn't exist to make a profit. Providing Supporting Members special privileges on your server, however, is wrong, because some people who desire those special privileges will become a Supporting Member simply to obtain those privileges. In this way, Tactical Gamer is making a profit off their server from people who would have withheld their money if there were no special privileges offered on their server to Supporting Members.
Pay money = receive server privileges
When people pay money (become a Supporting Member) simply to receive these, how isn't Tactical Gamer making a profit off their Project Reality: Battlefield 2 server?


