April Fools

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Navo
Posts: 1389
Joined: 2011-05-22 14:34

Re: April Fools

Post by Navo »

LieutenantNessie wrote:I ain't bored of it at all, great game, DEFINITELY better than PR. And now the battlrecorder/spectator mode coming the prizes from tournaments are gonna get bigger, so looking forward to that too.

I just wish PR with frostbite 2 though ;__; so much potential
I dont see how you can compare PR and BF3.

You should have said that you have more fun playing BF3 then PR.
LieutenantNessie
Posts: 1314
Joined: 2011-06-15 12:08

Re: April Fools

Post by LieutenantNessie »

Navo wrote:I dont see how you can compare PR and BF3.

You should have said that you have more fun playing BF3 then PR.
Well ofcourse I should've ^^.
realitymod.com drives me to drink.
SHADowPLAY2K9
Posts: 7
Joined: 2012-03-23 20:12

Re: April Fools

Post by SHADowPLAY2K9 »

LieutenantNessie wrote:I ain't bored of it at all, great game, DEFINITELY better than PR. And now the battlrecorder/spectator mode coming the prizes from tournaments are gonna get bigger, so looking forward to that too.
Do you have a link confirming battlerecorder ?
UTurista
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 985
Joined: 2011-06-14 14:13

Re: April Fools

Post by UTurista »

[R-MOD]IINoddyII wrote:PR: Zombies would be cool

(...)
does anybody know how unreliable those things are when used in a horizontal decapitating motion... Never mind the fact you'd have to stop and sharpen the blade every 20 zombies based on my experience.
(...)
(...)based on my experience(...)
:shock: :shock: What kid of experience? 911? anyone? :shock: :shock:

(...)
I just wish PR with frostbite 2 though
(...)
so much potential
Not even the DICE team took the most of the frosbite 2...

And in PR the Frosbite 2 engine would only be good to improve looks, because destruction 2.0 already is present and PR, in Karbala the little village NW of the city can be "fully" destruct by tanks, if I'm not mistaken.

and its not that good (for insurgency gameplay)
Image


Dont question the wikipedia! Just because it reports different things on different languages does not make it unreliable source!
LieutenantNessie
Posts: 1314
Joined: 2011-06-15 12:08

Re: April Fools

Post by LieutenantNessie »

SHADowPLAY2K9 wrote:Do you have a link confirming battlerecorder ?
Not battlerecorder but definitely spectatormode, if you log onto battlelog you'll see a shield and there's an option called "View match"

+There is "Finished matches" So i think you can watch the replay from a match which is kind of like the battlerecorder
realitymod.com drives me to drink.
40mmrain
Posts: 1271
Joined: 2011-08-17 05:23

Re: April Fools

Post by 40mmrain »

In upside-downland, maybe
Finners
Posts: 48
Joined: 2011-05-10 01:23

Re: April Fools

Post by Finners »

And in England :)
Image
Redamare
Posts: 1897
Joined: 2007-10-30 21:09

Re: April Fools

Post by Redamare »

for this years april fools were ACTUALLY going to release the update with Project reality Vietnam ^_^ Hush dont tell any one
DesmoLocke
Posts: 1770
Joined: 2008-11-28 19:47

Re: April Fools

Post by DesmoLocke »

I just have my fingers crossed that the April 6th release date for PR:Vietnam is accurate and not another bad joke. But I've been around this forum long enough to not get my hopes up around April 1st.
Image

Image

PR player since 0.5 (Feb 2007)

HMARS
Posts: 125
Joined: 2009-12-15 20:18

Re: April Fools

Post by HMARS »

What would really be bad is if the joke is that the original Vietnam announcement actually was a joke, and it doesn't actually exist.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”