What American Vehicle...

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Griffon2-6
Posts: 2487
Joined: 2006-05-26 04:21

Post by Griffon2-6 »

A GMC Sierra wouldn't be bad as a civilian vehicle.
Eddie Baker
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00

Post by Eddie Baker »

TheDarkOverlord wrote:The only vehicle that should be replaced is the Light Jeep, which could be replaced with the M151 for the US, Land Rover for British, BJ2020SJ for the PLA and UAZ-469B for the MEC.
The US does not use the M151 Jeep anymore, it was replaced by the HMMWV. Similar types of vehicle that are in service include the Ranger Special Operations Vehicle, USMC Interim Fast Attack Vehicle (Mercedes G type, short wheelbase) and some units still have Chenowth LSVs floating around.

We do eventually want to include mortars and mortar carriers, though.
zerocoolness
Posts: 48
Joined: 2006-09-27 19:06

Post by zerocoolness »

i wanna see the super stallion.....

it would be nice to have a HUGE chopper that deploys from the carrier to bring in more marines...

it would be slow. but tough. and have 3 mini guns.


they had this for desert conflict. where us attacks a oil platform.
Without the trick of the eyes, we are blind.
Hawk_345
Posts: 617
Joined: 2006-06-12 22:27

Post by Hawk_345 »

The super stalion would be ncie but really right now in Bf2 engine any 1 vehical can only suport 8 guys at the msot i think, u may be able to cram some guys in by making them not stand but they may just fall out because of the colison mesh or something like that.
Image
zerocoolness
Posts: 48
Joined: 2006-09-27 19:06

Post by zerocoolness »

Hawk_345 wrote:The super stalion would be ncie but really right now in Bf2 engine any 1 vehical can only suport 8 guys at the msot i think, u may be able to cram some guys in by making them not stand but they may just fall out because of the colison mesh or something like that.

thats fine.... i still want my super stalion.....

ooo. wat would be VERy cool is to have a grappling hook. (like in bf vietnam) so the super stalion can pick up jeeps. (and only jeeps)
Without the trick of the eyes, we are blind.
Thunder
Posts: 2061
Joined: 2006-05-30 17:56

Post by Thunder »

ghost buster truck
Image
trogdor1289
Posts: 5201
Joined: 2006-03-26 04:04

Post by trogdor1289 »

I want a super omg that is l33t vehicle that only R-guys get to drive.
Thunder
Posts: 2061
Joined: 2006-05-30 17:56

Post by Thunder »

the admins should get a back to the future deloren. and a hover boardpack.

OOOOOOORRRRRRRRR
a rambo knife and a bow and arrows (maybe exposive arrows to take out armor)

now thats a good idea
Image
Hawk_345
Posts: 617
Joined: 2006-06-12 22:27

Post by Hawk_345 »

zerocoolness wrote:thats fine.... i still want my super stalion.....

ooo. wat would be VERy cool is to have a grappling hook. (like in bf vietnam) so the super stalion can pick up jeeps. (and only jeeps)
Airlifting is not possible in the VBF2 engine, acording to the devs over at EOD mod. Its not the same as Bfv so alot of stuff is not possible for their vietnam mod.
Image
zerocoolness
Posts: 48
Joined: 2006-09-27 19:06

Post by zerocoolness »

Hawk_345 wrote:Airlifting is not possible in the VBF2 engine, acording to the devs over at EOD mod. Its not the same as Bfv so alot of stuff is not possible for their vietnam mod.

NOOOO airlifting was so fun.... boo hooo... wahhhhaaaaa. (crying)

butttt MoMMMM. i wannna airlift....
Without the trick of the eyes, we are blind.
duckhunt
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3314
Joined: 2005-08-28 18:20

Post by duckhunt »

zerocoolness wrote:NOOOO airlifting was so fun.... boo hooo... wahhhhaaaaa. (crying)

butttt MoMMMM. i wannna airlift....
lol airlifting the tank, flying around the NVA area while the tank fires off shells, then getting bored and dropping the n00b into the sea/ onto a flag from high up.

Or boat bombs.

Man I loved that game. PLayed it soooooooo much

come on charlie lay it on me!
Hawk_345
Posts: 617
Joined: 2006-06-12 22:27

Post by Hawk_345 »

zerocoolness wrote:NOOOO airlifting was so fun.... boo hooo... wahhhhaaaaa. (crying)

butttt MoMMMM. i wannna airlift....

yeah im sorry too, but its just not possible, so no airlifting for PRMM or EOD2, oh well, just have to do it the hard way again. Oh yeah, i want a Huey, but yall no that already.
Image
Top_Cat_AxJnAt
Posts: 3215
Joined: 2006-02-02 17:13

Post by Top_Cat_AxJnAt »

AAV and Armoured Humvee - gameplay reasons only.

And later a bradly, can make do with LAV for mo, althoughly either heavy adjucements need to be made on it, or we sit on realism for a fair few months.
Thunder
Posts: 2061
Joined: 2006-05-30 17:56

Post by Thunder »

more water bound transport is a must. or a uparmored humvee later on, other than that i dont see the marines needing any thing else. more chineese and MEC mobiles would spice things up.

but tbh the US team should be last side to have a refit. perhaps then focus on giving them unique branches further down the line. a marine/army split and throw in a stopgap to keep people happy for example a humvee refit with up-armored and tweaked handling splice a army ranger force focusing on a few night/jeep only maps.
Image
Bob_Marley
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7745
Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39

Post by Bob_Marley »

F16 with:

2 x AMRAAM missiles
2 x Durandal anit-runway bombs
6 x Maverick Missiles (laser guided, with laser designator for certain ground classes)
8 x Cluster bombs
1 x 30mm centre line cannon pod

= FTW!
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Image
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
Resjah
Posts: 812
Joined: 2005-08-24 02:33

Post by Resjah »

Bob_Marley wrote:F16 with:

2 x AMRAAM missiles
2 x Durandal anit-runway bombs
6 x Maverick Missiles (laser guided, with laser designator for certain ground classes)
8 x Cluster bombs
1 x 30mm centre line cannon pod

= FTW!
Couldn't agree more :mrgreen:

This was my 500th post :)
yay for me.
Last edited by Resjah on 2006-09-30 02:16, edited 1 time in total.
pvt.Taylor
Posts: 109
Joined: 2006-07-13 05:18

Post by pvt.Taylor »

I would like to see the bradly's IFV version replace the AA one, myself.

The mec/china also need more toys to mess around with, too.

While I also agree on the F-16, the mig can't compare to it. replace the mig with an SU-30, then you can put the F-16 ingame. China's aircraft is fine, but their transport helo needs to be changed, because it's almost idnetical to the MEC's. USMC should keep the bh for carrier maps, but change it for any other type.

well, thats my hope.
Top_Cat_AxJnAt
Posts: 3215
Joined: 2006-02-02 17:13

Post by Top_Cat_AxJnAt »

http://www.totalbf2.com/images.php?img= ... eeAAag.jpg

Is this illlagal becuase i thought adding to or changing DICE MOdels was forbiden and that is why PR has to re-models many vehicles rather than just make quicker changes to present ones.


Second thing:
http://www.battlefield2-news.de/
IF you scrol down abit, you will find a YouTube vid. Watch it AND LOOK for the part (about jsut over 1/3 through) a view from a vehicle, driving through a desert road BUT you cant seen any part of the actual vehicle - like in BF2v on aircraft where the camra is infront of the nose - NOTice at the top there is waht appears to be a moving compass or more preciely a bearing of somekind AND it changes and the guy turns.

Would such a feature for Vehicles be possible But with N, NW, W, SW ext.
DEVs and all know how usefull this would be in a 3 man VOIP tank.
Even for infantry such a feature would be usefull.

Thought i would post it becuase easy add new things IF other mods have tried and successfully added them before.

Another note to make is the part where with smoke and solders running through it - seems very thick, good. This screenshot is alos another example of how hardcor they have gone on the smoke: http://imageserver.gaming-networks.net/ ... 37add0.jpg Usefull to find out how laggy it is.

P>S cold not see any other place to put this. First part is on topic though.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”