The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post your feedback on the current Project Reality release (including SinglePlayer).
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Rudd »

ComradeHX wrote:Good for him(yay free kills).

Bad for his team.


This is a team game; not caw of dooty.
if he has a rifleman or two/crate nearby, then its fine lol.
Image
ComradeHX
Posts: 3294
Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by ComradeHX »

Rudd wrote:if he has a rifleman or two/crate nearby, then its fine lol.
If the destroyed humvee has a tank following it/near it, then it is not so fine.

HAT does have a pretty long reload time and deploy time.

Every shot wasted = lots of time for tank to kill the guy with HAT kit and proceed to roll over the rest of his team for a long time.

As far as realism goes; only really bored/stupid U.S. soldier would use heavy AT for massive overkill(those are free in PR but quite expensive in real life).

I am sure by now everyone realized the importance of HAT kit(especially when there is only one on the team) and how much wasting a shot can cost the team.
Navo
Posts: 1389
Joined: 2011-05-22 14:34

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Navo »

Jesus Christ for the love of all that's holy, why can't you understand that he meant that most can't hit a Humvee sized target at 350 3 times in a row. It was an example of the relative ineffectiveness of the German and Russian HAT kits. He didn't mean that he would use a HAT to engage a Humvee.

asdasdasdasdasdasd

*edit*

Also, your signature is god damn annoying
ComradeHX
Posts: 3294
Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by ComradeHX »

Navo wrote:Jesus Christ for the love of all that's holy, why can't you understand that he meant that most can't hit a Humvee sized target at 350 3 times in a row. It was an example of the relative ineffectiveness of the German and Russian HAT kits. He didn't mean that he would use a HAT to engage a Humvee.

asdasdasdasdasdasd

*edit*

Also, your signature is god damn annoying
Signature is made for that reason. And yours is more annoying(that orange).

And my point is that HAT IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE USED FOR SHOOTING SMALL TARGETS AT THAT DISTANCE ANYWAY(unless in your little world humvee is actually bigger than MBT). It is like saying sniper rifle cannot do full-auto and has huge movement penalty on deviation so it is pointless because it is less effective in CQB...

It is supposed to be effective(and it is) at its intended role and less effective in others; otherwise everyone should get this weapon because it is best at doing everything. If you ever looked at Soviet anti-tank defensive formation; RPG-7 is the LAST line(SPG-9 is in front of it, and ATGM/tank cannon even further) of defense against vehicles.
They are perfectly fine at the distance they are supposed to work at.

The real problem is the model of Russian AT, not effectiveness; it should have been something like RPG-29.
RPG-7 is equivalent of LAT at best; thus it was compensated with having two rounds instead of only one.

I am not going to mention Germans because I do not know as much about ze Germans.
Last edited by ComradeHX on 2012-04-24 22:06, edited 10 times in total.
Spec
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 8439
Joined: 2007-09-01 22:42

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Spec »

Seriously guys, if you want to continue this discussion, do it via PM. The points of both of you have been noted by the forum community. Removing the last few posts due to them being off-topic fighting.
Image
--- currently reduced activity ---
Thanks to [R-MOD]IINoddyII for the signature!
_____________________________
Propriety is an adequate basis for behavior towards strangers, honesty is the only respectful way to treat friends.
Hokunin
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 606
Joined: 2009-11-02 09:23

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Hokunin »

How about employing portable variant of "Metis M" ATGW for Russian Faction?
Last edited by Hokunin on 2012-08-27 05:33, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Souls Of Mischief
Posts: 2391
Joined: 2008-05-04 00:44

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Souls Of Mischief »

Nevermind.
Last edited by Souls Of Mischief on 2012-08-27 15:38, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Misread
Stealthgato
Posts: 2676
Joined: 2010-10-22 02:42

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Stealthgato »

He means replacing the tandem warhead RPG with the Metis, not the TOW. That's one hell of a change, and it is possible, FH2 has the portable deployable mgs and Alpha Project made a Mk.19 that works the same.
Souls Of Mischief
Posts: 2391
Joined: 2008-05-04 00:44

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Souls Of Mischief »

Stealthgato wrote:He means replacing the tandem warhead RPG with the Metis, not the TOW. That's one hell of a change, and it is possible, FH2 has the portable deployable mgs and Alpha Project made a Mk.19 that works the same.
Oh lord... I didn't notice the word "portable". Thats what I get for jumping on the PC straight after waking up.
izoiva
Posts: 613
Joined: 2012-02-16 12:17

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by izoiva »

Metis allows to shoot from the shoulder.
http://warfare.ru/db/catid/261/linkid/1663/

"The system allows delivery of fire in the prone position from organized and deployed sites, firing from the standing foxhole position as well from the shoulder, and carrying the ATGM system in packs, with pack No. 1 containing the launcher and missile in the firing attitude and pack No. 2 accommodating two Metis-M missiles."

Image
ShockUnitBlack
Posts: 2100
Joined: 2010-01-27 20:59

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by ShockUnitBlack »

RPG-29. 'Nuf said.
Scared_420
Posts: 403
Joined: 2009-06-25 07:15

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Scared_420 »

I will sum up this whole thread in one sentence that has been known since it was introduced.

Sight on Russian HAT is broken, please fix it.
Pvt.LHeureux
Posts: 4796
Joined: 2009-04-03 15:45

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Pvt.LHeureux »

I prefer to use the LAT, RPG-26 for the win, always been my favorite! :D
Image

Chuva_RD : You want to remove bugged thing but dont tell how to fill formed void.
godfather_596
Posts: 359
Joined: 2012-02-11 19:48

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by godfather_596 »

Metis M if we want a change RPG 29 is also cool (or maybe left click for metis M right click for RPG 29 or normal RPG-7 WITH scope) but if no changes are planned post a nice little guide on how to use the markings cuz the markings if properly used in tandem with a squad leader marker will lead to the damn thing being overpowered.

P.S about the humvee thing and not hitting with HAT you never know what the situation demands living to find more ammo is sometimes better than dying and saving it. If an apc happened to appear behind the humvee out of the blue after you fired HAT well shit happens, you either would've gotten killed by humvee and not killed any1 or by apc and killed humvee
karambaitos
Posts: 3788
Joined: 2008-08-02 14:14

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by karambaitos »

godfather_596 wrote:Metis M if we want a change RPG 29 is also cool (or maybe left click for metis M right click for RPG 29 or normal RPG-7 WITH scope) but if no changes are planned post a nice little guide on how to use the markings cuz the markings if properly used in tandem with a squad leader marker will lead to the damn thing being overpowered.
how will it become OP, since you have to be 100m from the target, and beyond that the SL marker works in increments of 50m, itll still be worse than any guided HAT
There is only one unforgivable lie That is the lie that says, This is the end, you are the conqueror, you have achieved it and now all that remains is to build walls higher and shelter behind them. Now, the lie says, the world is safe.? The Great Khan.

40k is deep like that.
Valleyforge3946
Posts: 210
Joined: 2009-12-09 18:53

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Valleyforge3946 »

ShockUnitBlack wrote:RPG-29. 'Nuf said.
This is supposed to be the Russian LAT? As to the weapons effectiveness.. i heard some poor chaps in the chally 2 got hurt as it actually penned the front.
SiŁeńŤĤŨňŤeŘ
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Rudd »

29 is the HAT, 26 is the LAT
Image
Swiftbluedragon
Posts: 8
Joined: 2009-12-01 22:38

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by Swiftbluedragon »

am i the only one that right clicks the russian lat? lets me get my training in without using a huge asset people rely on. since it gives the rpg with a scope
ComradeHX
Posts: 3294
Joined: 2009-06-23 17:58

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by ComradeHX »

Swiftbluedragon wrote:am i the only one that right clicks the russian lat? lets me get my training in without using a huge asset people rely on. since it gives the rpg with a scope
Just you.

Since RPG-7 has accuracy nerfed, scope does not really help.
=HCM= Shwedor
Posts: 432
Joined: 2009-09-04 22:17

Re: The russian HAT and LAT kits

Post by =HCM= Shwedor »

I right click the HAT to get the scopeless version when playing as Russia, on the rare occasion I take a HAT over simply building a TOW emplacement and a firebase. The scope is such a low power that it offers no advantage over iron sights really ingame and the iron sights make it easier to track/engage moving targets.
shwedor
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Feedback”