blackhawk physics

Psyrus
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3841
Joined: 2006-06-19 17:10

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by Psyrus »

yes thats all very interesting and i see your points but wow its hard to tell what someone is saying when they use absolutely no grammar and hardly and proper punctuation at all its like one long mind-destroying sentence that makes me want to claw my eyes out, Futher more Terrible when you dont seem to have any logical flow to the post so all your points are just kind jumbled into one neurofudging mess which obviously makes it very hard to dissect what your trying to say like a pickle, oh and i had a nice day thanks for telling me now on to your point about the 4 hour circling it just doesnt get any better than the chinok right that things like endless circles all day, And abotu the landing gear i find its best to do a rolling landing that way your chopper doesnt take any real damage the only problem is small or tight areas but if you are gona drop peole there you should just hover and let them out but i guess since you cant even land without stalling you probably cant hover either
now ty for reading my post which is like your post and i hope you have a good night
saXoni
Posts: 4180
Joined: 2010-10-17 21:20

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by saXoni »

Flying around in a circle comes down to the pilot's skills. Landing comes down to the pilot's skills. The Chinook is even worse when it comes to the view, but it's still fine. You just need to change your way of flying a bit, which is fine as all choppers are different.

Why would you want to kill armor with a Blackhawk? There are other types of vehicles and weapons that can be used for that. It can kill infantry perfectly fine.
=HCM= Shwedor
Posts: 432
Joined: 2009-09-04 22:17

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by =HCM= Shwedor »

7.62mm miniguns killing a BMP? You should lay off the drugs man, bad for your health. And its not a flight sim, you don't get working control panels...
shwedor
ExeTick
Posts: 855
Joined: 2011-01-13 22:50

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by ExeTick »

I loled. miniguns killing a bmp? its only 7.62. you need a 12.7mm(50cal) ammo to be able to kill MEC btr/MTLB.

they should do more damage to taliban cars thats the only thing.

flying mechanics to blackhawk in PR is good. only you who need to learn how it works.
Pvt.LHeureux
Posts: 4796
Joined: 2009-04-03 15:45

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by Pvt.LHeureux »

Is this why people always teamkill this guy for fun? :razz:
Image

Chuva_RD : You want to remove bugged thing but dont tell how to fill formed void.
Stealthgato
Posts: 2676
Joined: 2010-10-22 02:42

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by Stealthgato »

ExeTick wrote:you need a 12.7mm(50cal) ammo to be able to kill MEC MTLB
Nope. MTLBs can be killed even with MP5s (yes I've done it).
chrisweb89
Posts: 972
Joined: 2008-06-16 05:08

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by chrisweb89 »

I will agree the flying physics for the BH are weird. Its a chopper that I love sometimes, and hate other times, same with its landings, its very different compared to the handling of the rest of PR choppers. It doesn't really need fixing or anything though, the most annoying part for me is when you turn the BH, it likes to stay in that turn (if you turn hard and when going quickly).

Then saying that the 7.62 miniguns should kill armour ruins your post.
Steeps
Posts: 1994
Joined: 2011-08-15 15:58

Post by Steeps »

Psyrus wrote:yes thats all very interesting and i see your points but wow its hard to tell what someone is saying when they use absolutely no grammar and hardly and proper punctuation at all its like one long mind-destroying sentence that makes me want to claw my eyes out, Futher more Terrible when you dont seem to have any logical flow to the post so all your points are just kind jumbled into one neurofudging mess which obviously makes it very hard to dissect what your trying to say like a pickle, oh and i had a nice day thanks for telling me now on to your point about the 4 hour circling it just doesnt get any better than the chinok right that things like endless circles all day, And abotu the landing gear i find its best to do a rolling landing that way your chopper doesnt take any real damage the only problem is small or tight areas but if you are gona drop peole there you should just hover and let them out but i guess since you cant even land without stalling you probably cant hover either
now ty for reading my post which is like your post and i hope you have a good night
Great way to bash on someone when your own grammar needs some help...



But on topic; OP the Blackhawk is fine how it is. I've just about never had problems with flying it. And honestly, the miniguns are OP for a transport helicopter. They outgun any OPFOR transport chopper every day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Image


Image
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by Rhino »

Steeps5 wrote:Great way to bash on someone when your own grammar needs some help...
If you read the last line of his post you will see that he did that on purpose to show CHM how hard it is to read, but I can see why you missed it :p
Image
maniac1031
Posts: 257
Joined: 2010-03-16 20:12

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by maniac1031 »

You still don't need to bash on the guy because he doesn't have perfect grammar he may not be fluent in English.
chrisweb89
Posts: 972
Joined: 2008-06-16 05:08

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by chrisweb89 »

The 50 cal on the Cows are decent, I've had some fun running cow cas in the first 10 minutes on vadso and other maps, yay for explosive rounds!
Hunt3r
Posts: 1573
Joined: 2009-04-24 22:09

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by Hunt3r »

Blackhawks are fine. Maybe the wheels need some suspension so you can land at something harder than .1 m/s impact velocity, but the minigun is really only good against unarmored vehicles and people, and no one should be doing barrel rolls anyways.
Image
ExNusquam
Posts: 89
Joined: 2011-06-10 19:02

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by ExNusquam »

CrazyHotMilf wrote:look if you compare the UH-60 to the UH-1 there is no big difrence but in the game you feel that 1 BH have the weight of 3-4 hueys , and you can say what ever u want about the miniguns the helicopter still shit , the only vannila vehichle that i really love its the LAV-25 , you gonna have to make a new model for BH cause u cant even land on the front wheels , and if you do the heli gets injurd like some kind of a light AT hited him, and if you ever played kokan u know you have to fly in circles over the cash to make the bh effective and not just wasting ammo.
Look if you compare the UH-60 to the UH-1 there is no big difference but in the game you feel that 1 BH has the weight of 3-4 Hueys , and you can say what ever you want about the miniguns, the helicopter is still shit , the only vanilla vehicle that I really love is the LAV-25 , you're gonna have to make a new model for BH cause you can't even land on the front wheels , and if you do the heli gets injured like some kind of a light AT hit it, and if you have ever played Kokan you know you have to fly in circles over the cache to make the BH effective and not just wasting ammo.
BTW THIS IS NOT GRAMMER CLASS SO IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH MY SPELLING U CAN JUST GTFO
BTW THIS IS NOT GRAMMAR CLASS SO IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH MY SPELLING YOU CAN JUST GTFO
chinok is the best chopper ingame (flying like a huey , trasnpoting 8 man + 2 crates , easy to land )
The Chinook is the best chopper in game (flying like a Huey , transporting 8 man + 2 crates , easy to land )


Also, I think you would benefit from a few periods.

TL;DR: Don't ever imply that proper grammar isn't important.
IINoddyII
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2268
Joined: 2008-02-06 03:12

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by IINoddyII »

The last word on grammar in this thread.
Language
Posts should be in English only. Non-English posts may be removed. If a message is unreadable due to spelling and / or grammar, it may be removed. We don't ask you to be a 'Spelling Bee' champion, or an English Major, only that you post messages that are legible.
.

So in the future, rather than being a bit of a snob, I've included a few more appropriate options;

1) ignore the post and move on with your life.
2) report the post so a moderator can take action (clean it up or remove it)
3) take the time to decipher it and a) send a PM to the OP with your suggested rewording, or b) respond normally.
samogon100500
Posts: 1134
Joined: 2009-10-22 12:58

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by samogon100500 »

Well,chopper physics... a bit imbalance to real world.
For exampe - CH-47 Chinook and UH-1Y Venom.
Their speed much more that rest of chopper,while IRL they are not so fast.And specially for Venom - Carry supplies and passangers looking unrealistic.They may carry only around 3000Kg of flying weight,1100 of them - fuel.Too much for light chopper to me.
The bad examples - Mi-8,BH and Z-8(Vanilla choppers.) their speed extremely slow(If compare to IRL it will be around 100km/h),but in fact they may flight with almost same speed as Chinook,and even faster.
Mi-8(The Mil Plant website,warning - russian language :razz: )
UH-60(Eng.Wiki)

Guns for transport choppers in not nessesary.Most stupid fu..s shooting for no reason,that make pilot angry.
Minigun is useful,50 cal MGs on Mi-8 and Z-8 - not.
ExNusquam wrote:Look if you compare the UH-60 to the UH-1 there is no big difference blah blah blah


The best trolling ever I seen :-P
You make me smile. :razz:

Stealthgato wrote:Nope. MTLBs can be killed even with MP5s (yes I've done it).


6 man squad may desroy it using rifles.1-1,5 mags enogh.
Image
DenvH
Posts: 208
Joined: 2008-01-01 09:17

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by DenvH »

I've never flown a blackhawk or anything really irl, but as far as I know they do touch down with their rear wheel first.. Look up any video of one landing and you'll see it for yourself.

I know that in-game it can be difficult to land it, but with a bit of practice you can pretty much land it wherever you want. The difficulty is in keeping it balanced. The blackhawk is the only transport chopper with a single rear wheel in PR, that's most likely why it's the hardest for you to land..

As far is flying it goes, it's no different from any other chopper. It has it's own style if you like, and maybe it's the hardest to fly, maybe not. If that is realistic, I can't tell you. And maybe it needs a little change, maybe they already changed the physics for it in PR1.0, I don't know. But until then you can only learn to control it and find out it's not that bad at all.

----

I agree on the Mi-8 feeling/being slow. Overall, I think the speed amongst choppers should be balanced a bit as they roughly fly at the same speeds irl. Second, I guess all choppers could do with a little more speed again. Back in 0.5 they flew like rockets, I don't know how realistic that was though.. But then again, in the scale of PR, you may not want them to fly that fast for game-play reasons.
karambaitos
Posts: 3788
Joined: 2008-08-02 14:14

Re: blackhawk physics

Post by karambaitos »

well realistically, if they go over 350mph their blades should kinda disintegrate
There is only one unforgivable lie That is the lie that says, This is the end, you are the conqueror, you have achieved it and now all that remains is to build walls higher and shelter behind them. Now, the lie says, the world is safe.? The Great Khan.

40k is deep like that.
Post Reply

Return to “Vehicles”