Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Post by **Rhino** » 2013-01-17 18:11

Close...ish?

Frank Jeager · Post by **Frank Jeager** » 2013-01-17 18:11

QualityHD wrote:PR is 0.98 now, so will they be a 0.99 before 1.0 releases?

Fixed .

Phoenixo_Idaho · Post by **Phoenixo_Idaho** » 2013-01-17 18:14

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:I also believe Dr Rank has too

I personally haven't gotten to that stage yet

Outlawz is the worst thou, he rage deletes his work

Please don't let him deletes rage the 1.0 client file !

ExNusquam · Post by **ExNusquam** » 2013-01-18 01:01

Out of sheer random curiosity, will we ever see the US Army re-textured to multi-cam?

Rabbit · Post by **Rabbit** » 2013-01-18 02:56

ExNusquam wrote:Out of sheer random curiosity, will we ever see the US Army re-textured to multi-cam?

Seems a little pointless as it's only for Afghanistan maps.

Post by **Spush** » 2013-01-18 04:22

gx wrote:Seems a little pointless as it's only for Afghanistan maps.

Exactly, when the US Army decides to go change the camouflage officially, then yeah, we'll probably change them.

ComradeHX · Post by **ComradeHX** » 2013-01-18 06:18

What about RusFed?

Do they get digital Flora because it became officially widely(ish) issued already?

Any need for new kit geometry incorporating 6sh112 system? (may be a good reason for me to learn 3d modeling)
I have actual 6sh112 in digital flora for making accurate measurements.

Post by **M42 Zwilling** » 2013-01-18 19:28

Did anything ever come of this?

ShaunOTEast · Post by **ShaunOTEast** » 2013-01-18 19:52

Will the Canadian Forces get the Griffon helicopter in 1.0?

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

ShockUnitBlack · Post by **ShockUnitBlack** » 2013-01-18 19:56

Not a dev, but probably.

Also, I noticed you guys have got a new contributor who I take it specializes in... making really badass explosions?

Post by **Outlawz7** » 2013-01-18 20:06

[quote=""'[R-DEV"]Rhino;1855232']
Outlawz is the worst thou, he rage deletes his work

[/quote]

Technically that isn't hardware. I'm so in the market for file recovery software, though.

[quote="Phoenixo_Idaho""]Please don't let him deletes rage the 1.0 client file !

[/quote]

You can't delete PR 1.0, it's like Skynet.

ShockUnitBlack · Post by **ShockUnitBlack** » 2013-01-18 20:07

Outlawz7 wrote:You can't delete PR 1.0, it's like Skynet.

Sweet Mother! Somebody call John Connor before we lose all our spare time!

Oh wait

PricelineNegotiator · Post by **PricelineNegotiator** » 2013-01-18 23:48

Outlawz7 wrote:Technically that isn't hardware. I'm so in the market for file recovery software, though.

You can't delete PR 1.0, it's like Skynet.

On March 16, 2013, Project Reality became self aware.

mockingbird0901 · Post by **mockingbird0901** » 2013-01-18 23:56

M42 Zwilling wrote:Did anything ever come of this?

That would be sweet

Tit4Tat · Post by **Tit4Tat** » 2013-01-19 01:02

Did you (DEV's) at some point realized the potential of PR and its unique features to completely change your mindset from a hobby to a viable business opportunity?

Post by **Arab** » 2013-01-19 04:26

Outlawz7 wrote:Technically that isn't hardware. I'm so in the market for file recovery software, though.

You can't delete PR 1.0, it's like Skynet.

So it's hosted via Cloud Service as we speak? *Ninja Glare*

Don't answer that question.

Post by **AfterDune** » 2013-01-19 10:49

There are 3 letters, though 1 is a Psalm and can be found in the Church on Bloody Gulch. That's not really special. The other 2 are more for 'fun' and are only on Overlord.

I see you've found the letter to Catherine

.

There is another one

. It's directed at whoever reads it.

Phoenixo_Idaho · Post by **Phoenixo_Idaho** » 2013-01-19 11:18

PricelineNegotiator wrote:On March 16, 2013, Project Reality became self aware.

If machines uses current ballistic deviation, we won't even have to find a John Connor to win the war against "Realistic machines".

I hope 1.0 will send to the past PR 2 or 3 to allow his future slaves to play with before Judgment Day !

Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)

Re: Ask the [Dev]s a (?)